On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
... The real question might be why this needs to be duplicated (I assume)
between LDAP and a file - any advice from infra?
It is not strictly duplicated. committee-info.txt contains
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...Chris proposes that this
committee recommend its own demise to the board, to be replaced, in
large part, by the board itself. Every board member who has been heard
from so far has been less than enthusiastic...
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
As far as I understand your comment, Ant, you mean to say that he problem
is that there is too much variation in opinion and approach. (Primarily, I
understand, in relation to releases.)
Hi Noah, i suggested that one of
Thanks for the clarification, Ant. Is the documentation ignored? Whenever I
look through it, it seems like the problem is that it is incomplete and
confusing. It's hardly a wonder people disagree. ;) (This is just a bit of
rhetoric. I hardly mean to imply the documentation is responsible for the
On Apr 1, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
As I see it, the primary attraction here is that we could end up with
*one* coherent body of documentation on policies and procedures,
available to project new and old.
For whatever it's worth, I'd like to participate in such an effort in
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the clarification, Ant. Is the documentation ignored? Whenever I
look through it, it seems like the problem is that it is incomplete and
confusing. It's hardly a wonder people disagree. ;) (This is just a bit of
On 3 April 2013 14:41, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the clarification, Ant. Is the documentation ignored?
Whenever I
look through it, it seems like the problem is that it is incomplete and
confusing.
Could you remove Kafka from the incubator report since it already graduated
to a top level project last Nov?
Thanks,
Jun
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, I just realized I had replied in private and this is a comment for
general@.
Hello,
the kafka project needs to clean up.
Steps are described here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#project-first-steps
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you remove Kafka from the incubator report since it already
Hello all,
after getting valuable comments about our release candidate 3 for S4 0.6.0,
we'd like to cut a new release candidate.
However, we are still not sure about how to address the comments we received,
and we cannot work on a new release candidate without understanding the proper
actions
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Matthieu Morel mmo...@apache.org wrote:
Hey there, just back from vacation, hopefully Sebb can weigh in but
here's my thinking:
We have 2 key questions, which I reproduce below:
1/ about the content of LICENSE and NOTICE, is the following correct?
- in the
On 3 April 2013 16:36, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
So how about having just historical info in the text file, and LDAP
for current info?
Isn't this the current rationale? I see the LDAP group answering the
question Does the person A belong to
Hi, Matthieu,
It sounds like you folks are trying hard to get this right -- kudos!
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Matthieu Morel mmo...@apache.org wrote:
1/ about the content of LICENSE and NOTICE, is the following correct?
- in the LICENSE file of the binary distribution, in addition to
13 matches
Mail list logo
