Request to grant write access on Incubator Wiki to aditihilbert

2016-04-05 Thread aditi hilbert
Hi, Please grant me write access by adding my account to the ContributorsGroup. My Incubator wiki username is aditihilbert. I would like to submit the April board report by tomorrow and subsequent reports as well. thanks, aditi

[NOTICE] Community graduation vote for Apache Zeppelin

2016-04-05 Thread Alexander Bezzubov
Please note that a community graduation vote is in progress for Apache Zeppelin (incubating) [1]. Kind regards, Alex 1. https://s.apache.org/Fhl0

MX4J dependency in Geode

2016-04-05 Thread Anthony Baker
I'm working on clearing an issue [1] found during the review for Geode 1.0.0-incubating.M1 [2] (thanks Justin!). We have a bundled source dependency on an MX4J file [3]. The file in question has a license [4] that is similar but different to ASF v1.1 [5]. How should we deal with this license?

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2016" by SwapnilBawaskar

2016-04-05 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:02 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Swapnii, > > Please correct the edit conflicts. I took the liberty of reverting the changeset with conflicts, because it's easy if you know how but a pain to figure out if you don't. All that's necessary now is to

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2016" by SwapnilBawaskar

2016-04-05 Thread John D. Ament
Swapnii, Please correct the edit conflicts. John On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:36 PM Apache Wiki wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" > for change notification. > > The "April2016" page has been changed by

New IPMC Uma Gangumalla, Suneel Marthi

2016-04-05 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Greetings, The Incubator PMC has two new members. Suneel Marthi (smarthi) is the PMC Chair of Apache Mahout and an Apache Member. Uma Gangumalla (umamahesh) serves on the Apache Hadoop and Apache Bookkeeper PMCs and is an Apache Member. Welcome! Marvin Humphrey, on behalf of the Incubator PMC

Re: [VOTE] Graduate TinkerPop from Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread John D. Ament
+1 On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:11 AM Stephen Mallette wrote: > The Apache TinkerPop community has discussed graduation to a top level > project and achieved consensus: > > https://s.apache.org/PKhX > > Please vote on the resolution that follows to graduate Apache TinkerPop >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate TinkerPop from Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
+1 (mentor and ipmc) Hadrian On 04/05/2016 07:11 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: The Apache TinkerPop community has discussed graduation to a top level project and achieved consensus: https://s.apache.org/PKhX Please vote on the resolution that follows to graduate Apache TinkerPop from incubator

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2016

2016-04-05 Thread John D. Ament
That's fine. If you want to remove it go for it, otherwise I'll be editing the report page shortly and can remove you. John On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:13 AM Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Incubator, > > It seems that this request for a report is in error -- we already completed > our

[CANCELED] [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

2016-04-05 Thread James Sirota
On 4/5/16, 2:30 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: >[CANCELED] [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

2016-04-05 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
There are some tools that rely on specific formatting of vote subject lines, to cancel this vote the subject should read: [CANCELED] [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7 -Taylor > On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:23 PM, James Sirota wrote: > > THE VOTE IS CANCELLED > >

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

2016-04-05 Thread James Sirota
THE VOTE IS CANCELLED On 4/5/16, 2:21 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: >I also replied on dev@metron. Let's cancel this vote sort it out there. > >-Taylor > >> On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:15 PM, James Sirota wrote: >> >> So was the proper process to

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

2016-04-05 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
I also replied on dev@metron. Let's cancel this vote sort it out there. -Taylor > On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:15 PM, James Sirota wrote: > > So was the proper process to cancel the RC6 vote and point everyone to the > RC7 vote? As Casey mentioned, the only issue was that

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

2016-04-05 Thread James Sirota
So was the proper process to cancel the RC6 vote and point everyone to the RC7 vote? As Casey mentioned, the only issue was that the Snort dependency changed and we had to re-link. Otherwise they are identical. We could have gone ahead and put up a vote for RC6 on the general boards, but we

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

2016-04-05 Thread larry mccay
Have to admit that I as confused by that as well. I voted previously and didn't see a CANCEL - so I intended to dig through the emails to see what I missed bit haven't gotten around to it. On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Casey Stella wrote: > Regarding what changed between

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

2016-04-05 Thread Casey Stella
Regarding what changed between RC6 and RC7, it was just a PR to correct the snort URL issue, from teh changelog: METRON-92: Snort has moved their release artifacts, breaking deployment (dlyle65535 via cestella) closes apache/incubator-metron#65 On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

2016-04-05 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
James, I’m a bit confused. There’ve been a number of votes on the dev@ list, but only one that was closed with a RESULT (rc5). I voted on rc6, but it seems that rc was abandoned without ever being CANCELED. The labels/links in the message below don’t match (RC6 != RC7) — which I imagine is

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating released

2016-04-05 Thread Yuri Zelikov
The Apache Wave community is pleased to announce 0.4.0-incubating release. The source and binary release can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/wave/0.4.0-incubating/ Changes:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Craig Russell
+1 for graduation (binding) I don’t see any value in keeping Johnzon in incubation. The project seems to be ticking along, with several releases, frequent commits, and a low excitement but active community. Craig > On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate TinkerPop from Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Daniel Gruno
With both my mentor and IPMC hat on, +1 (binding)! With regards, Daniel. On 04/05/2016 01:11 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > The Apache TinkerPop community has discussed graduation to a top level > project and achieved consensus: > > https://s.apache.org/PKhX > > Please vote on the resolution

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
+1 from me. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 I'd like to further elaborate why we did not choose to graduate under Geronimo or TomEE. * TomEE: Johnzon is not only bound to a JavaEE container but could really be used separately, e.g. in CXF. It would be kind of weird if we need to do a Johnzon release in TomEE first, then build CXF to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Hendrik Dev
I agree with Justin, there is no real benefit (either for the podling nor for apache/incubator) when Johnzon stays in the Incubator. We have an active, friendly, diverse and responsive community, we had regular releases, we promote Johnzon [1] and Jira tickets are typically closed a few days

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate TinkerPop from the Apache Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Stephen Mallette
You are right - fixing that now - thanks On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Stephen, > > Would you mind updating your project status page? I suspect the latter 2015 > entries are actually 2016. > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tinkerpop.html >

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate TinkerPop from the Apache Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread John D. Ament
Stephen, Would you mind updating your project status page? I suspect the latter 2015 entries are actually 2016. http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tinkerpop.html John On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:37 PM Stephen Mallette wrote: > The TinkerPop community/mentors have had a

[VOTE] Graduate TinkerPop from Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Stephen Mallette
The Apache TinkerPop community has discussed graduation to a top level project and achieved consensus: https://s.apache.org/PKhX Please vote on the resolution that follows to graduate Apache TinkerPop from incubator to top level project. This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks,

[VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

2016-04-05 Thread James Sirota
This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7 Full list of changes in this release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES The tag/commit to be

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Mark Struberg
Good morning! Of course Johnzon could be bigger. And as said before: there are 3 active committers (not 2!) and an active PMC. Plus there are at least 2 further people who contributed patches and are on our watch-list. I also believe that we are a really friendly community :) That said I

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9-rc1

2016-04-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The only new files are build related cmake or yaml files. That's probably OK but given the statement in the LICENSE that all files without Apache headers are BSD licensed it probably would of made sense to add the headers to reduce any confusion. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

2016-04-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I agree the project doesn’t have a large visible active community but I’m also not sure what the point of having Johnzon staying in the incubator. They tick along nicely, they certainly don’t need the incubator to check their releases and they understand the Apache Way of doing things.

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2016

2016-04-05 Thread Todd Lipcon
Hi Incubator, It seems that this request for a report is in error -- we already completed our initial three months of monthly reporting and should now be reporting as part of group 2 (next report due in May). I missed updating the podlings.xml file after our most recent report. Shall I go ahead