Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

+1 (binding) On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Balaji Ganesan > > wrote: > > > +1 Great to see the progress from the Ranger community. > > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:54 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

Pierre, Where can I download or "consume" a project community? I would like to have a local copy of it, right here. ;-) Communities are living things, people, and not an immutable release artifact. Incubation is not a release process, it is effectively an education program for inexperienced

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Thanks Joe - I've added you to the commiter list :) On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Joe Spisak wrote: > Awesome! Please sign me up as a committer - I've been working with Mu on > MXNet (Amazon) and would love to get more involved with project! > > GitHub ID: jspisak > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Thanks Markus - I've added you to the proposal :) On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Markus Weimer wrote: > On 2017-01-05 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling. >> > > Awesome! If you still need a mentor, feel free to sign me

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Awesome! Please sign me up as a committer - I've been working with Mu on MXNet (Amazon) and would love to get more involved with project! GitHub ID: jspisak Sent from Joe's iPhone On 2017-01-06 08:44 (-0800), Henri Yandell wrote: > Understood. I saw that Greg had recently approved another

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

Jochen, On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:56 PM Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > -1 > > Because I fail to see a problem with the current policy. > I'll point out this has already been canceled. I'd ask you to bring your questions to the related discuss thread.

Re: Write access to January report page

Added, happy editing! On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:16 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote: > Thanks Marvin, > > It appears my Incubator Wiki ID is already "MattRutkowski" (read-only > access) if this is the one we can add to the ACLs for: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MattRutkowski >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

+1 (binding) On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Balaji Ganesan wrote: > +1 Great to see the progress from the Ranger community. > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ramesh

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

-1 Because I fail to see a problem with the current policy. On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:22 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > I'm calling to vote on a proposed policy change. Current guide at [1] > indicates that maven artifacts should include incubator (or incubating) in

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

Nicolas, all, Despite your believes, you do release communities. Because the community is the incubating project. Only after the community meets the criteria of graduation a proposal is submitted, seconded by the IPMC and reviewed by the board. The community works the code during incubation until

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Awesome! Please sign me up as a committer - I've been working with Mu on MXNet (Amazon) and would love to get more involved with project! GitHub ID: jspisak Sent from Joe's iPhone - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Write access to January report page

Thanks Marvin, It appears my Incubator Wiki ID is already "MattRutkowski" (read-only access) if this is the one we can add to the ACLs for: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MattRutkowski Carlos is on vacation today and will ask him to send his ID hen he returns. Kind regards, Matt From:

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

On 06.01.2017 17:32, Wade Chandler wrote: [] It's not a big deal YET, but http://codehaus.org is not reachable anymore. yes, Ben told me he does not want to give the domain away right now. When the time comes, he will think about donating it to the ASF. when this will be I do not know

Re: Write access to January report page

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Matt Rutkowski wrote: > The OpenWhisk moderators would like to begin submitting status on behalf > of OpenWhisk, but have also found we do not have write access to the Wiki. > Previously, our mentor Felix Meschberger provided this for our >

Re: Write access to January report page

The OpenWhisk moderators would like to begin submitting status on behalf of OpenWhisk, but have also found we do not have write access to the Wiki. Previously, our mentor Felix Meschberger provided this for our first/initial report, but would like to help him to not be the sole persons

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

@wade it would be better to continue the discussion in the discuss vote, rather than this vote which has been cancelled. See https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/15550f5bf622ae3070b558505c8a0fd0ce3b23df3012d57de8b6d9f3@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E 2017-01-06 17:32 GMT+01:00 Wade Chandler

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

On 2017-01-05 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling. Awesome! If you still need a mentor, feel free to sign me up! Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Request to join IPMC

Hi, I'm an Apache member and am already helping the Hivemall project as a mentor. It is about time I join the IPMC :) Thanks, Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Understood. I saw that Greg had recently approved another podling to do this. Though, assuming approved, there will still need to be some infra headscratching on the 3,000 issues currently on the main dmlc/mxnet repo and how imports are best done :) The simplest would be to transfer the current

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:52 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > There seem to be some discrepancies in the proposal vs what they currently > have. That and some comments in line. > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:12 AM Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Hello Incubator, >

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

On Jan 4, 2017 4:46 AM, "Jochen Theodorou" wrote: On 04.01.2017 07:28, Mark Struberg wrote: [...] I'm a bit surprised that groovy still uses the org.codehaus groupId, but I > guess they have a deal with Ben (the former owner and thus (former?) > copyright holder of

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

On Jan 3, 2017 7:06 AM, "Guillaume Laforge" wrote: When you say "it denotes a lack of maturity which is exactly the purpose AFAIK", what do you mean my maturity? Maturity in terms of how well it follows Apache processes and principles? Or in terms of "the project is not ready

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

+1 On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Wade Chandler wrote: > On Jan 2, 2017 7:53 PM, "Pierre Smits" wrote: > > > +1 Drop the -incubator/-incubating expectation of maven projects > > It is not the code that is incubating. > > Whether a project of

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

-1 Ralph > On Jan 2, 2017, at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > I'm calling to vote on a proposed policy change. Current guide at [1] > indicates that maven artifacts should include incubator (or incubating) in > the version string of maven artifacts. Its

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Apache SystemML(incubating) is also a flexible, scalable machine learning system[4]. > Apache SystemML provides an optimal workplace for machine learning using big > data. It can be run on top of Apache Spark, where it automatically scales > your data, line by line, determining whether your

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Hi Henri, It's a great news! Looking forwarding to MXNet's coming to Apache Incubator :-) Two minor comments: > We currently use Github to maintain our source code, > https://github.com/MXNet In my understanding, the following url is correct one. https://github.com/dmlc/mxnet > ===

Re: [DISCUSS] publishing docker image for podling

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Taking off my Infrastructure hat from within that issue, and speaking to > > this from a Foundation policy standpoint ... I think this is