Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable > stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can handle as a follow > up JIRA (run it by legal first, as I'm honestly curious). I

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Incubating Quickstep 0.1.0 RC7

Thank you to everyone who voted on the dev vote of RC7. +1 John (binding) Julian (binding) Josh (binding) Jignesh Thank you for voting! -Marc Vote thread: *https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg59059.html

Re: [VOTE] Apache Quickstep (incubating) 0.1.0 RC7

I do not think we have been through the search like described in [1]. In regards to the quickstep technologies in the Notice file, I'm not sure of its legacy, maybe it was a former name that Jignesh or one of the more senior project members would know. Anywho, we have a Jira about the notice

Re: [VOTE] Apache Quickstep (incubating) 0.1.0 RC7

+1 release looks good. also, thank you for not treating the incubating as part of the version #! One side question - I notice in the NOTICE file you reference Quickstep Technologies. Have you been through your namesearch yet and if so was that name a problem? John On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:47

Re: [VOTE] Apache Quickstep (incubating) 0.1.0 RC7

At the time of the vote close, we only have 2 IPMC votes. Could we request the powers that be take a quick look? Cheers, Marc On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Forwarding my vote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mar 22, 2017, at 12:44 PM, Jignesh Patel

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:52 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > To be honest, I don't know, but I don't see it as a problem. > > I will admit upfront that I am a Hortonworks employee, so there is > potential for bias. But I always try to wear the right hat, even when my > position

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can handle as a follow up JIRA (run it by legal first, as I'm honestly curious). I suspect the ruling would be that the ASF header is OK to leave there since the tooling

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

To be honest, I don't know, but I don't see it as a problem. I will admit upfront that I am a Hortonworks employee, so there is potential for bias. But I always try to wear the right hat, even when my position may not please my employer. As a mentor (to this and other podlings), I try to

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

This is a list of 24 of which 12 are Hortonworks. Can we assume that the other 12 of which 6 are PPMC are unaffiliated? What percentage of the commits are coming from Hortonworks affiliated contributors? Thanks, Dave > On Mar 23, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Casey Stella wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

On 2/21/17 12:13 PM, Chip Senkbeil wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Toree (incubating) version 0.1.0. I have a question about checksums and really about the validation script in the release: etc/tools/verify-release. Should I be concerned about the below or

Re: Where to edit a podling's data for whimsey?

On 03/24/2017 11:18 PM, Stack wrote: > I am having trouble finding where to edit to fix a podling's whimsey view? > Pointers appreciated. > Thanks, > St.Ack > TL;DR: https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/ ;) With regards, Daniel

Re: Where to edit a podling's data for whimsey?

Stack wrote on 3/24/17 6:18 PM: > I am having trouble finding where to edit to fix a podling's whimsey view? > Pointers appreciated. > Thanks, > St.Ack Which specific data and/or which Whimsy URL do you need to update? Whimsy URLs that might be relevant: https://whimsy.apache.org/public/

Where to edit a podling's data for whimsey?

I am having trouble finding where to edit to fix a podling's whimsey view? Pointers appreciated. Thanks, St.Ack