Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi, > I'm wondering how to fix the license headers of modified codes. See points 3 to 5 of [1] so unless major changes have been made it best to keep the original header and not add an ASF one. Points 1 and 2 are sort of important as well :-) Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi, Note the mix of public and private lists (as I’m replying to where it was sent). However I think this should be discussed on dev@hivemall not private@. > I'm revising LICENSE and NOTICE files following your comments and [D]. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

2018-02-06 15:49 GMT+09:00 Makoto Yui : > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/LICENSE#L205 > (copyrights are removed from LICENSE) > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/NOTICE Let me correct. LICENSE information is removed from NOTICE.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi Justin, I'm revising LICENSE and NOTICE files following your comments and [D]. https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/LICENSE#L205 (copyrights are removed from LICENSE) https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/NOTICE Does it seem okey for you? [D] says

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Hi, > I have created a PR to revert the LICENSE file to the previous version. I > have also updated this file with a few packages that were missing here. > Link to PR - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9701 > > It would be great if you could review this PR to suggest any other >

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

I have created a PR to revert the LICENSE file to the previous version. I have also updated this file with a few packages that were missing here. Link to PR - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9701 It would be great if you could review this PR to suggest any other necessary changes.

Re: Deleting older releases (was: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0)

Please note though that this release is only old once the new release is approved. So there's no rush in deleting the 1.0 release until 1.1 has passed. Most projects that I deal with simply do this as a part of the release execution. John On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:36 PM Haibin Lin

Re: Deleting older releases (was: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0)

Thanks for the suggestion! I'll update the wiki as soon as I get internet access. Best, Haibin On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:04 PM, sebb wrote: > On 5 February 2018 at 23:40, Haibin Lin wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. I've updated

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Thank you for the comments. The license issue should be fixed in the next RC then. Other than that, is moving submodules like dmlc-core/nnvm/ps-lite etc. to 3rd-party a must-have for the the next release candidate of 1.1.0? In the original LICENSE file (MXNet 1.0.0) we explicitly state that these

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Good news! I think Dubbo will be more and more popular. On 2018/02/04 04:06:44, Xin Wang wrote: > +1 (non-binding)> > I'm glad to see the coming of Dubbo which is a very popular RPC framework.> > > > 2018-02-03 19:44 GMT+08:00 Huxing Zhang :> > > > Dear

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Are there any files apart from these excluded ones where you see missing > licenses? > > You don’t need to exclude files that are under a different licensesI would > rather see them in the rat report so I

Deleting older releases (was: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0)

On 5 February 2018 at 23:40, Haibin Lin wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Thanks for the suggestion. I've updated the release process wiki at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Process#ReleaseProcess-3.7.CleanupolderreleasesonASFmirrors >

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Hi Sebb, Thanks for the suggestion. I've updated the release process wiki at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Process#ReleaseProcess-3.7.CleanupolderreleasesonASFmirrors

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

On 5 February 2018 at 22:51, Haibin Lin wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > I've deleted the older releases and will remove 1.0.0 after 1.1.0 is > officially announced. OK, thanks. Please also update any release process docs to ensure tidyup takes place after every release. > Best,

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Hi, > Are there any files apart from these excluded ones where you see missing > licenses? You don’t need to exclude files that are under a different licensesI would rather see them in the rat report so I know what 3rd party software is there. And yes I noticed a couple (which would not be a

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Hi Sebb, I've deleted the older releases and will remove 1.0.0 after 1.1.0 is officially announced. Best, Haibin On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Haibin Lin wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > I'll clean up the old releases now. Thanks for the reminder. > > Best, > Haibin > > On

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Livy 0.5.0-incubating released

Great, thanks for the effort, Alex. Alex Bozarth 于2018年2月6日周二 上午5:05写道： > > > The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release of Apache Livy > 0.5.0-incubating > > Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long running > Apache Spark contexts in

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Hi Sebb, I'll clean up the old releases now. Thanks for the reminder. Best, Haibin On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: > On 31 January 2018 at 21:48, Haibin Lin wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

On 31 January 2018 at 21:48, Haibin Lin wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0, release > candidate 0. Reminder: please delete old releases from the ASF mirrors. It's not fair to expect volunteer mirrors to carry them.

Re: Need write access to the wiki

Added, happy editing On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:51 PM Alex Bozarth wrote: > Sorry, I missed your response to my email, my wiki username is AlexBozarth > > > > Thank you, > > *Alex Bozarth* > Software Engineer > Spark Technology Center > > -- >

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Hi Justin, Thank you for your time to review this Release Candidate. For this Release I attempted to fix most of the pending license issues and I have documented all the changes in this wiki - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Licenses Any comments/feedback would be

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Livy 0.5.0-incubating released

The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release of Apache Livy 0.5.0-incubating Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. With Livy, new applications can be built on top of Apache Spark that require fine grained

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 non-binding Dubbo has good user base already. Very pleased to see it become an Apache project. Jack Kevin A. McGrail 于2018年2月5日 周一下午6:07写道： > +1 binding > > On 2/4/2018 10:28 PM, dongeforever wrote: > > +1 > > > > 2018-02-05 11:26 GMT+08:00 Jeff Zhang

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Sure, sounds reasonable. Let's stick to one :) On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:58 PM, sebb wrote: > On 5 February 2018 at 11:01, Ian Luo wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > Considering today's large Dubbo users, I think we'd better separate the > > mailing lists from the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

On 5 February 2018 at 11:01, Ian Luo wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Considering today's large Dubbo users, I think we'd better separate the > mailing lists from the very beginning, so that everyone can be benefit > since in this way we could use dev to discuss product bugs/features, and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Mark, Considering today's large Dubbo users, I think we'd better separate the mailing lists from the very beginning, so that everyone can be benefit since in this way we could use dev to discuss product bugs/features, and use user for troubleshooting purpose. Regards, -Ian. On Mon, Feb 5,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

On 03/02/18 11:44, Huxing Zhang wrote: > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DubboProposal > > Dubbo is a high-performance, lightweight, Java based RPC framework. > Dubbo offers three key

Re: [VOTE] Retire iota

On 04/02/18 22:44, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Iota podling. > > The podling has discussed retirement [1], has not made a single release and > there's been little activity on it’s mailing list [2] and repos [3] in recent > time. > > [ ] +1

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 binding On 2/4/2018 10:28 PM, dongeforever wrote: +1 2018-02-05 11:26 GMT+08:00 Jeff Zhang : +1 Adam Feng 于2018年2月5日周一 上午11:00写道： +1 Thanks. Adam Feng On 3 Feb 2018, 7:45 PM +0800, Huxing Zhang , wrote: Dear Apache Incubator