> 1. there is bunch of dubbo-2.6.2-SNAPSHOT in the pom.xml file, I guess the
> maven release plugin doesn't take all of them.
> .//bom/pom.xml: dubbo-2.6.2-SNAPSHOT
> .//dependencies-bom/pom.xml: dubbo-2.6.2-SNAPSHOT
> .//distribution/pom.xml:2.6.2-SNAPSHOT-SNAPSHOT
> .//pom.xml:
The general meaning of source code is that it is the artifact that people
will edit and which they can inspect by normal textual or graphical means
to ensure that there are no surprises.
Javascript code that is minified or combined in any major way is much more
like binary code in that respect. It
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:07 PM, SHUANG SU wrote:
> Thanks, Justin,
>
> I think I should remove the jar about rat from the artifact, and then
> there is no binary code anymore.
>
> But I am puzzled about the definition of the term "compiled code".
> Generally, the JavaScript code does not need t
Thanks, Justin,
I think I should remove the jar about rat from the artifact, and then there
is no binary code anymore.
But I am puzzled about the definition of the term "compiled code".
Generally, the JavaScript code does not need to be compiled to binary.
The code in "dist/**" is also JavaScript
+1.
Kudos to the podling for voting for retirement. The JIRA gives hope that
there is user activity, but if the lack of commits and existence of a
technical alternative in Hadoop suggests this is a good decision.
Hen
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> After a long perio
Hi,
I did some check on the source zip and binary zip, the License and Notice
files looks good. But I also found some issues here.
As I cannot build the binary without doing some changes on the pom file, I
had to vote -1 (binding) here.
Here are the issues that I found:
1. there is bunch of dubb
Hi Matteo,
The PR looks good. I really like the script that does the check.
Please make sure you run it as a routine to verify the release kit.
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Mon, Ma
Apache Arrow is receiving a code donation of a Ruby language library [1].
Please vote to approve this contribution.
This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process
[2], open for at least 72 hours.
Wes
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-ruby-library.html
[2]
Willem, thanks for catching these issues.
I have fixed the missing dependencies, specified the exact version of each
of them
and added a script to validate that new changes won't break it later.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/1820
I will cancel this vote and create a new candidat
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 5:32 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> Willem, thanks for catching these issues.
>
> I have fixed the missing dependencies, specified the exact version of each
> of them
> and added a script to validate that new changes won't break it later.
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pu
Hi all,
The Apache NetBeans community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release candidate.
Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) vote thread:
https://l
Hi,
Releases at the ASF must not contain compiled code. You can if you want
also produce a conviance binary for users at the same time but the source
release needs to contain no compiled code otherwise it's not open source.
Thanks,
Justin
On Mon., 21 May 2018, 7:10 am SHUANG SU, wrote:
> Thank
Thanks, Willem.
But I will explain the reason that provides an all-in-one artifact.
I understand that one of the reasons for separating src and binary files
is that in some project the compilation is depending on the target runtime
environment and thus the products cannot be enumerated completely
After a long period of low activity, the Slider PPMC has recently decided
upon retirement [1]. Please vote on whether we should retire the Slider
podling. Here is my +1 (binding).
[ ] +1 Retire Slider
[ ] +0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not retire Slider because ...
This vote will remain open for 72 hour
If the release candidate isn't correct for the artifacts you need to roll
an rc4 which might be two files not one and send that for a vote.
On Sat, May 19, 2018, 22:34 Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As there is only one zip file, I guess it just the src distribution.
> But after went through the
Hi, IPMC
I am asking the release vote, again. :) Haven't had one yet. Hope we can have
enough vote in 72 hours.
Thanks.
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking
From Wu Sheng 's phone.
---Original---
From: ".??"<8082...@qq.com>
Date: Fri, May 18, 2018 10:06 AM
To: "general";
Subject: [VOTE] Release
Seems there is no big enthusiasm - which is what i kind of expected ;), so
I guess I'll keep it on github for now (https://github.com/rmannibucau/playx).
If anyone becomes interested and feels we can create a community, dont
hesitate to ping me.
Thanks guys.
Le jeu. 17 mai 2018 02:55, Willem Jia
17 matches
Mail list logo