On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:12 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Yegor Kozlov yegor.koz...@dinom.ru wrote on 06/02/2011 01:36:52 PM:
I can't speak for the whole project, but personally I'd be interested
in
discussing how the POI mission statement could be expanded, and if
that'd
work well
I'll ask ODF Toolkit to report since they missed.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 1, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone feels that they urgently want to start on the May report right
now, I can create the template and check it into svn. Otherwise I'm going
Hi -
I've been incredibly busy, but to me the main thing wrong in the Incubator is
focusing on what might be wrong rather than executing on the process we already
have (or had).
Shepherds worked when they were assigned at random by the IPMC chair well in
advance of the report. This helps to
On May 15, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
If you look at proposals and email, you will notice that several
people who disagree on many things agree that this group has trouble
making decisions by consensus, due to size, diversity, and perhaps
sheer orneriness.
One possibility
(Member)
* Sebastian Bazley sebb at apache dot org (Member)
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
* Simone Tripodi simonetripodi at apache dot org (Member)
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Sebastian Bazley sebb at apache dot org (Member)
* Mohammad Nour mnour at apache dot org (Member)
* Dave Fisher wave
Greg was a great co-mentor on Apache Flex.
It would be interesting to see a scatter chart of number of initial mentors vs
time in incubation.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Greg Reddin
Hi Shane,
On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Apologies if this horse has been beaten already, but... have we discussed the
concept of splitting incubator operations into a handful of separate groups,
based on technology areas?
I.e. while the IPMC or ComDev or whoever would
I think what we really should discuss is how the IPMC can help podlings in as
simple a way as possible.
I think we are looking for people in the IPMC who are willing to help podlings
solved their real and their perceived problems. An Ombudsman is one title for
someone like that and so is
On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
I would prefer to use well known names for well known roles. Ombudsman is a
roll that's been around for quite a while and the person filling that role
for the ASF will be doing roughly the same thing as ombudsman in other
organizations.
On Jun 27, 2013, at 1:33 AM, Andrei Savu wrote:
This is the first release candidate for Apache Provisionr, version
0.4.0-incubating.
The PPMC vote thread:
On Jun 28, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 28, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
About two weeks ago, Stephan presented the Apache Olingo (OData) proposal
[1].
There has been a bit of a discussion about the name and the diversity of the
On Jul 2, 2013, at 8:12 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Can you also once recap the timelines you are expecting the podlings
reports, shepherd reviews, and draft summary, and submission to board?
I believe our schedule is
+1 (binding) - well done. A long and winding road to graduation.
Regards,
Dave
On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:30 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 6, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpa...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache JSPWiki podling is
HI Alan,
If you are on then I am +1.
Thanks,
Dave
On Jul 7, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I can help here.
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
While excited by this technology and project, I have to be -1.
Why
Dave FisherJSPWiki
Ready to graduate. A VOTE is in progress on general@.
Still needs to file July board report.
Dave FisherStratos
Still getting started. Very active lists.
I noted a slight impatience with Infrastructure.
Is it worth establishing a timeline or SLA
On Jul 17, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Ross Gardler DeviceMap
Project is in good shape and operating well. Ramping up for a release.
Active mentor engagement where needed.
Ross Gardler
holders should step aside (assuming their objections
are unlikely to cause long lasting damage) or step up (assuming they have an
alternative proposal).
People *have* stepped up -- Alex for starters. Then there's Dave Fisher, who
argues that the proposed ombud role serves basically the same purpose
Marvin,
I completely agree. There has been rather little happening in VXQuery for quite
some time
Regards,
Dave
On Aug 22, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
(continuing a conversation which is cross-posted to general@incubator and
vxquery-dev@incubator...)
Hi VXQuery developers,
Hi Ant,
I was the shepherd on VXQuery in their last reporting period. I really don't
feel like anything is really happening in the project, at least not anywhere
that is visible. I even asked a technical question about one of their suggested
use cases - organize and accessing Edgar documents.
FisherDrill
Dave FisherS4
Matt Franklin Olingo
Matt Franklin Provisionr
Ross Gardler Wave
Matt Hogstrom Sentry
Benson Marguilies Spark
Suresh Marru Allura
Suresh Marru Samza
Roman Shaposhnik Kalumet
Roman
for our September 2013 report:
SHEPHERD PODLING
--
Alan Cabrera Falcon
Alan Cabrera MetaModel
Alan Cabrera Tajo
Dave FisherDrill
Dave FisherS4
Matt Franklin Olingo
Matt Franklin Provisionr
Hi -
Well I was late with my retraction. So, I did so to the board directly and with
the report.
Sorry for any consternation. Best of luck. I do think that once your podling
does release that TLP status should come soon.
Regards,
Dave
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Ted
Wonderful.
On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release.
The vote thread can be found here:
If you have concerns about Apache OpenOffice it is no longer incubating. If you
will contact the project on its lists with a concrete example.
Otherwise to my knowledge LICENSE and NOTICES are correct at an appropriate
level.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 18, 2013, at 7:49 PM,
On Sep 24, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
...So fill the bus with anybody who volunteers? That does not sound
meritocratic
It's been like that for a while in the Incubator, people who sign up
as
A Mentoring question.
Some of the committers in a podling want to access Jenkins.
The instructions are here:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins#How_do_I_get_an_account
I take it that for a podling any of the mentors should take the role of the PMC
Chair and do this action. Please let me
://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2013
Raphael Bircher Olingo
Alan Cabrera Celix
Alan Cabrera VXQuery
Dave Fisher DeviceMap
Dave Fisher Spark
Although there are no reports yet. These projects both look healthy with active
development.
DeviceMap looks like
On Oct 6, 2013, at 9:19 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Dave Fisher DeviceMap
Dave Fisher Spark
Although there are no reports yet.
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank
You have two IPMC votes. You need one more IPMC vote to pass.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Vinayak Borkar wrote:
Dear general@,
A few weeks ago, there were concerns raised about the VXQuery project's
ability to make releases. We now have an RC that has been voted for by the
PPMC and is
+1 (binding)
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
Since discussion about the Sirona seems done, I'd like to call a vote
for Sirona to become an incubated project.
The proposal is pasted below, and also available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SironaProposal
Let's
Hi -
I checked the source release and the signatures check out.
Before I can VOTE I have questions.
(1) What is the following file?
A
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/vxquery-core/src/test/resources/documents/dblp.xml.gz
Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as:
HI Ant,
On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
Dave/Vinayak,
My understanding is that the ODC-BY license only needs to be run by ASF
legal if there is a concern about it, I've read the license when voting on
this and AFAICT its fine (and the package is not being modified so it could
Hi Nick,
I did a somewhat cursory review of the 10 years of emails in the XML Beans
archives and have some definite ideas about governance. I don't think that they
are for discussion yet - it will be up to the podling community.
Regards,
Dave
On Oct 24, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Oct 11, 2013, at 6:08 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
Vinayak, the release does not need to be redone yet. If it really looks
like this will hold up getting
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 7 November 2013 11:20, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
The Incubator has a fundamental structural
I don't think this is prudent, having only one binding vote is too low a check.
We at the ASF have a responsibility to the public. I want to be certain that no
one steam rolls the process. Just the fact that there are edge cases means we
need to be careful.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
Hi -
Apologies for not getting around to it. I've been on the road and work
continues to be a grind.
Aurora is starting out and Open Climate Workbench looks fine - graduation soon?
That was my initial look at the start, and then oops time's up.
Regards,
Dave
On Nov 11, 2013, at 3:04 PM,
Dislike.
For small projects, PPMC == Committers is a great starting point.
For huge projects like OpenOffice something like this would have been chaos
unleashed.
If it were 3 or 4 then I would not have volunteered to be a Mentor for Apache
Flex.
To me the answer should remain somewhere
and Dave
Fisher. The remaining question is whether we can arrive at an agreement in
terms of how many IPMC votes it takes to get a release approved.
Ant, you proposed a minimum of one IPMC vote for each release:
http://s.apache.org/CHS
How about simply changing the rules
How many +1 IPMC Binding Votes did you have from your Mentors?
Putting this information clearly in the thread is very helpful.
Regards,
Dave
On Nov 20, 2013, at 8:09 AM, larry mccay wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating.
A vote was held on
So we vote to make Till an IPMC member and then we have a proposal to allow
VXQuery to have a non-Apache Member cast the only IPMC binding VOTE on a
release.
Sorry, but that is one step too many. Here is my proposal - see if invoking the
old experiment (making a pdling PPMC member into an IPMC
Hi Alex,
I like where you are going with this, but I think that rather than invent a new
role within the ASF we might actually be on the track to how we make the IPMC
more like a normal PMC.
What you are calling IP Auditors is really one example of Incubator Committer
- there are two kinds of
Hi,
Apologies for returning to this after one week, but I have been on vacation.
I am not against this experiment in general, especially after Bertrand's later
clarification.
I am against the experiment in VXQuery's case because Till has already been
made an IPMC member under the prior
On Nov 27, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I am not sure that this is a step in the correct direction.
Dave, I'm sure you
Marvin,
I applaud your efforts here. If we are going to take PPMC release votes as
binding then we should be sure that these are up to standards. Even if we
don't this is still very valuable.
One note I have is I don't think we should be teaching that some of release
steps are optional when
On Dec 1, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
One note I have is I don't think we should be teaching that some of release
steps are optional when they are required.
Don't get me wrong -- I would actually prefer
On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:17 AM, sebb wrote:
On 2 December 2013 13:52, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
...In response to Bertrand's proposal at http://s.apache.org/awz, I've
created
a
On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:17 AM, sebb wrote:
... But it is much harder to update an SVN document compared with replying
to an e-mail.
Someone running the VOTE would
There is a small negative to this process. How do non-committers VOTE on
releases?
This doesn't make me negative, but we ought to have an explanation.
On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Which
On Dec 6, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/votes/$PODLING/$RC
On Dec 5, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I am only comfortable allowing singular IPMC votes from members of the ASF.
I think the IPMC owes this much to the other members of the Foundation.
I've now
On Dec 12, 2013, at 2:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Marvin,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
I also went another round on the Manifest template and the Release Procedure
section of the guide (not yet committed):
[X] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
I kinda feel it doesn't need the Policy change and at this point it should be
the 2014 ... but hey - still a positive vote.
Regards,
Dave
On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Greetings,
As the next step in our ongoing
I guess Marvin can't count to the fourth Dave.
I also voted +1. Between Ant's and Chip's votes.
On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
[ ] -1
On Dec 25, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
January 2014 Incubator report timeline:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2014
FYI - Helix has graduated so I have removed it from the report.
Regards,
Dave
Wed January 01 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun
. To me it is the ability to get three proper +1 VOTEs on
releases.
Anyway - go CELIX! Let's see if 2014 is a magical year.
Regards,
Dave
On Dec 26, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 25, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
January 2014 Incubator report timeline:
http
On Jan 13, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
On 9 January 2014 21:55, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal looks good. Let me know if you need any additional help in
mentors.
Enis
+1 -I'd really like input from the HBase and Accumulo teams as they are the
first
Sorry my limited Apache time was taken yesterday by catching up cadence
issues.
I checked DataFu and it is getting started in fine shape. The mentors are doing
a fine job.
I checked Hadoop Development Tools and there is some concern. Development is
either stalled since November when
Your wayward mentor agrees.
Sorry I have lacked time to review this release.
Regards,
Dave
On Feb 10, 2014, at 1:55 AM, Klevenz, Stephan wrote:
Thanks :-)
Discussion about graduation will start soon...
Stephan
On 10.02.14 10:36, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, why
Hello -
If someone from the IPMC would look at this release candidate it would be
appreciated.
(Sorry, but I have not found time myself.)
Thanks,
Dave
On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed:
Hi -
Small nonblocking issues with this release candidate:
(1) The source should not include the KEYS file.
(2) I have trouble with the build so I could not judge the build. A maven 3
build would be nice and it is beiung discussed by the podling.
(3) I ran manual rat scans using Apache RAT
On Mar 12, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi -
Small nonblocking issues with this release candidate:
(1) The source should not include the KEYS file.
OK. Hopefully you saw that we also have the file
of the Apache Olingo Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Olingo Project:
* Florian Mueller f...@apache.org
* Dave Fisher
+1, binding.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hi all,
Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and
called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@
Hi -
I've been too busy to do more than lurk occasionally. Consequently I am not
mentoring and not shepherding lately.
I do want to add something to this debate. PMCs write their board reports to
the board in whatever way they want. The Incubator is about teaching PPMCs how
to become PMCs. We
contribute to
Apache OO by providing portions of the LO codebase as MPL binary libraries.
Sam, is this the direction you are leading us?
Regards,
Dave Fisher
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
On Jun 4, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Once licensing issues are understood then a way the two communities might
mutually cooperate becomes clear. And here it is LO/TDF might contribute to
Apache OO
On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Keith Curtis wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
We are a type-O org. Anyone can take our blood and mix it with their own.
That universal donor condition places lots of restrictions on our projects,
but somehow they
On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Keith Curtis wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
You have recipient and donor roles reversed. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_donor#Red_blood_cell_compatibility
Search the archives for some of Sam Ruby's
On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Keith Curtis wrote:
What are you talking about? You can relicense to your hearts content. You
just can't contribute it back under some other license otherwise user's
couldn't use it and then relicense it. If you can't grasp that concept then
there really is
Sure. Hi everyone (maybe the people that Rob knows should introduce themselves
as well - some of us are new to the community.)
My name is David Fisher. I have been in the software industry for over 30
years. I've worked in many computer languages - FORTRAN, PL/1, C, C++,
Postscript, Java,
On Jun 7, 2011, at 6:54 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote on 06/07/2011 09:23:25 PM:
Sure. Hi everyone (maybe the people that Rob knows should introduce
themselves as well - some of us are new to the community.)
My name is David Fisher. I have
Of course we had been using ODFDOM but the issue is how do you get ODF
transformed accordingly to other formats such as RTF, AFP or PDF and
make those formats look consistent with what you would get if doing
the transformation natively during design time in OO or Symphony.
I think your
I started looking around at the OOo website.
I'm not sure if now is the time to bring this up, but at
http://contributing.openoffice.org/donate.html there is a solicitation for
funds via three processes.
Here's what the page says:
Your donation will go directly towards helping this project.
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Andrew Rist wrote:
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
searching for a more complete answer
On Jun 9, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Sam,
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:54 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
The net of all of this is that there will need to be a substantial
public aspect to this entire discussion. Yes, I will probably have
some private discussions with ASF lawyers
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Non-binding.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
FYI Apache OpenOffice.org podling has been active for two weeks. Information
is here.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/
What do the people here on the POI project think of
Keep in mind this thread is in three places or two places or one place all
depending on how people have replied. It will be confusing. Please include
POI-DEV so we can discuss it here without going everywhere else as well.
On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
FYI Apache
On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
And I've added it to the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
-Rob
What can I do to help?
Good
On Jul 28, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to ODF Toolkit incubation
[ ] -1 Reject ODF Toolkit for incubation
+1.
Dave
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
- Sam Ruby
HI Nick,
If you have been waiting for three volunteers before moving forward then I'll
raise my hand as well.
I'm looking forward to working with Yegor and you as mentors. I hope you won't
be waiting for me to walk my bike up the headlands while you look at the Golden
Gate!
:-D
Regards,
So what does it mean when a committers userid - mine is w...@apache.org == a
project name Apache Wave?
Not that I have noticed any spam coming to me.
Regards,
Dave
On Aug 19, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hi Dan,
thanks. I have updated the status page for wave to reflect
On Oct 30, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Oct 30, 2011, at 7:05 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
[...snip...]
Even so, my basic view is that these folks are viable as a TLP, and if
someone really disagrees, I might feel strongly enough to ask the
board to shoot my head
Hi Devin,
I know I haven't been completely engaged in ODF Toolkit (incubating) lately. I
don't know if I have time to give this first release enough attention to vote
before the deadline.
Please consider extending the 72 hours to a full week.
Best Regards,
Dave
On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:49 AM,
podling PPMC and all the fun that has entailed.
I'm very interested in Flex as a platform especially now that it is at the ASF.
Regards,
Dave Fisher (w...@apache.org)
On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC and ASF members,
In case you missed my earlier call
+1 (not yet binding)
Regards,
Dave
On Dec 27, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC members (*),
I've just reviewed the [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator thread
and I think all relevant issues have been adressed now.
I have added Anne and Dave Fisher
On Jan 3, 2012, at 2:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce that Anne and Dave have been elected by the
Incubator PMC to be members of that PMC.
Thanks!
With this the Flex mentors roster is complete, thanks for volunteering!
You're welcome!
Regards,
Dave
Yes, congratulations!
On Jan 11, 2012, at 7:21 PM, Devin Han wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC7 ballot has ended. We have
received 4 IPMC +1 votes (plus an additional 4 PPMC +1 votes)
during the release voting on dev and general. The vote passed!
Results:
From
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 7:47 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 1/30/2012 7:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote
Hi,
I would like to point out that a reminder on the day the report is due is NOT
plenty of time.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 February 2012, 10:00:00 PST. The
report
for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator
PMC
requires your report to
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:30, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi,
I would like to point out that a reminder on the day the report is due is
NOT plenty of time.
While the *reminder* may not have given you much time, note
On Feb 1, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 14:40, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
There is no announcement. The calendar is set well in advance:
repos/committers/board/calendar.txt
OK. With this and the script, I guess you would say that patches
On Feb 2, 2012, at 5:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
OK. With this and the script, I guess you would say that patches are
welcome ;-)
If someone would point me to the script I'd like to see if I can make an
improvement trying on my new IPMC
arrange
access to the script for you to hack on (it's in perl).
Yes, please.
Thanks,
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: Giving podlings enough time to report
consider this a bug we can arrange
access to the script for you to hack on (it's in perl).
- Original Message -
From: Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: Giving podlings enough time to report
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 3 Feb 2012, at 23:17, Benson Margulies wrote:
A number of people are asking for the incubator PMC to take a deep
breath and allow room to digest and contemplate the various issues
that have led to a bumper crop of email. These are complex
On Feb 4, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 3 Feb 2012, at 23:17, Benson Margulies wrote:
A number of people are asking for the incubator PMC to take
On Feb 4, 2012, at 12:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/4/2012 12:45 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
If it is different from Chris's then I think Bill should write his proposal.
Dave, mine is not difference in process, substance or requirements.
Do you advocate the 3 Apache Members per
1 - 100 of 1155 matches
Mail list logo
