Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 released

> Announcements of incubating releases must include the standard disclaimer. I've read that release *artifacts* must include the disclaimer. Where is the announcement email content specified? > Please link instead to > > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/netbeans/KEYS OK. > Please don't

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 released

EANS Emilian Bold on behalf of Apache NetBeans PPMC 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ab58e2c75d260a91851d8def412b1ef6648aaf4f690b205aaaf53924@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsu

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

. I will proceed to publish the release and send ANNOUNCE. On behalf of the Apache NetBeans podling, thank you! --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 24 July 2018 8:27 AM, Emilian Bold wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache NetBeans community has voted on and approved a proposal to release

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

days. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 (incubating) [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Emilian Bold on behalf of the Apache NetBeans

Re: Suggestion for podling reminder report emails.

+1 Maybe the script just BCCs all the podlings, otherwise it should be a small change to make. --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 10 June 2018 12:28 AM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > Hey all, > > I have been personally slacking a bit, but I wanted to point something out. > > I subscribe

Re: Fwd: graphviz as a potential apache project

Apache NetBeans is a pretty big and mature project too and it's still undergoing incubation. The advantage for NetBeans is that Sun Microsystems / Oracle owns all the IP and just donated it to Apache. It might be a bit more complicated for Graphviz. That being said, I'm totally +1 on Graphviz,

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 RC1 released

: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS Emilian Bold on behalf of Apache NetBeans PPMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

NetBeans community voted +1 in the PPMC vote for this release, one Apache NetBeans PPMC member voted -1. I will proceed to publish the release and send ANNOUNCE. On behalf of the Apache NetBeans podling, thank you! --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 21 May 2018 1:33 AM, Emilian Bold

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Silly question but must Apache releases include test data? Is there a restriction on such minor binary files in the repository or just binary files in the release zip? I see no problem excluding all the tests in future NetBeans releases. --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 27 May 2018

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Thanks Ate! We still need a few more votes this week the close voting. --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 23 May 2018 11:44 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: > On 2018-05-23 20:57, Emilian Bold wrote: > > > Ate, could we get a vote on this release? > > Sur

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

incubator-general/201801.mbox/<c4c5d5c4-ab44-4afe-ade2-9e91f593a...@classsoftware.com> > > [3] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+Beta+rc3 > > On 2018-05-21 00:33, Emilian Bold wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

e ‐‐‐ On 23 May 2018 4:07 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Emilian Bold > > emilian.b...@protonmail.ch wrote: > > > We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201801.mbox/<c4c5d5c4-ab44-4afe-ade2-9e91f593a...@classsoftware.com> > > [3] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+Beta+rc3 > > On 2018

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-821 to keep track of this. --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 21 May 2018 6:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 May 2018 at 23:33, Emilian Bold emilian.b...@protonmail.ch wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The Apache NetBeans co

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

bout it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Emilian Bold on behalf of the Apache NetBeans PPMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

> I would favor a system of marker(s) indicating the code maturity (incl legal) There is no standard afaik to indicate legal or community 'maturity'. It would be something for a (RDF) vocabulary for artifacts to be adopted industry wide. Right now none of the Maven coordinates are a good fit

Re: Github tagging, was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Joshua 6.1 RC#2

The subject is a bit odd, but isn't https://github.com/apache an official Apache Software Foundation repository? And https://github.com/apache/incubator-joshua/releases with the big blue Releases button seems suggestive (or confusing) to downstream users. The solution, due to GitHub's quirk, is

Re: [VOTE] Weex to enter the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) --emi On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Bono Lv wrote: > > The proposal was updated to add ASF id of our Champion and Mentors... > > Ok thanks, +1 for accepting the

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

able to me: > the comments in this thread should be considered friendly advice, nothing more. So there is no incubation-impacting decision to be made here. În mar., 22 nov. 2016 la 15:03 Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> a scris: On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Emilian Bold <

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

How can the project name be a problem when "weex" sounds to me like the very common English word *weeks*? So unless somebody really plans to veto the incubation proposal due to this very minor linguistic issue and considering the fact that the project has some history and is already publicly

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

I believe the working language[1] of ASF projects is English. 1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_language În Vin, 11 nov. 2016 la 11:13 Bertrand Delacretaz a scris: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman > wrote: > > ...there have

Re: Incubator chat on Hipchat?

t; On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Would hipchat be logged somewhere? > > > > Is it possible to be at least some weekly digest email? > > That might be possible. See INFRA-12328. > > Jochen > > -- > The

Re: Incubator chat on Hipchat?

Would hipchat be logged somewhere? Is it possible to be at least some weekly digest email? Pe joi, 3 noiembrie 2016, John D. Ament a scris: > All, > > Infra recently started leveraging hipchat. A few PMCs have made use of > it. I was wondering, would it be beneficial

Re: Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))

> 3) You write how the topic of "what value does the ASF provide to my project" comes up quite frequently in the incubator. Unless already done, I would like to see this documented under some stable URL to point people to. Not only do I get this question to from time to time, it might also help

Re: Radical proposal: no initial list of committers

Considering the effort that went into this and the fact that we had just reached a point where we could move on past this list, I hope you start using this new rule for the next project submitted. Pe marți, 27 septembrie 2016, Greg Stein a scris: > The NetBeans proposal (among

Preliminary NetBeans cost findings (was: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal)

Ross Gardler is the current president of the ASF so in a way he does sign the check and should be worried about these things. Still, the number of Java developers is only growing and they need an IDE and NetBeans is a major IDE with 1.5 million individual users! This number is probably

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

A NetBeans release is produced from the NetBeans Mercurial repository. All the language modules: Java, Javascript, C/C++, etc. you see there after install are Oracle / NetBeans code. The Plugins Portal has some other, 3rd party modules which don't come bundled with the official builds but users

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

> hg doesn't have the committer/author separation like GIT has, right? :( > I don't believe it does, yet. > In the ASF it's good practice to give credits to the patch contributor in > the commit, e.g. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bafa2ba5977ab88c8dfe376c97568 >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

time. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > On Saturday, 24 September 2016, 7:46, Emilian Bold < > emilian.b...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > So on one hand the initial commiters list is not something so > important and > > we

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

So on one hand the initial commiters list is not something so important and we should realy just be careful about the PPMC then vote more commiters during incubation. On the other hand the initial commiters list is super important. Is there some actual incubation documentation clearing this up?

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

> > git clone of the Linus' repo takes 3 minutes. > > The hg clone of netbeans took 5 HOURS! > This is surely dependent on the network and the server the git/hg client talks to. > The repo size is 3.6GB. But it contains many binaries which we could > probably strip off. > I really don't like to