I would say that for this single request and this single release, a one-time
exception is warranted.
> On Feb 15, 2016, at 6:01 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> I agree that an incubating release does not need to be fully compliant with
> the proscription against mandatory LGPL dependencies for Apa
Under the same conditions, yes.
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:04 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I would say that for this single request and this single release, a one-time
>> exception is warranted.
>
> Cool, except that I
+1 (binding)
> On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> As Justin mentions this is a bit rough, but it is a v0.8-b1 release, and it's
> been very good for the podling to go through the process of a full release.
>
> Sterling
>
> On 2/26/16 7:01 PM, Christopher
+1
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Gino Bustelo wrote:
>
> @john The 0mq ecosystem is made up of many projects of different sizes and
> maturity. In the case of JeroMQ, the committers are showing an overwhelming
> momentum to transition to MPL. I don't see any reason for us to consider any
> ot
This has not been formally or officially requested and/or demanded
by the Incubator to Legal Affairs.
W/ my legal affairs hat on, I am not going to "take away"
responsibility from a PMC unless it is required or asked
or demanded of Legal Affairs. As of right now, this responsibility
is still the I
+1 (binding)
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 4:48 PM, Christopher Collins wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release
> Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3. We now kindly request
> that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator
>
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion. Or rather, reduce
> the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation. Once the project
> has entered incubation, the champion’s role ends.
>
++1 on removing the role total
>
>
> Mynewt
>
> [ ](mynewt) Sterling Hughes
> [ ](mynewt) Jim Jagielski
I signed off on this.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additiona
+1 (binding)
> On May 2, 2016, at 5:07 PM, marko kiiskila wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release
> Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator
> PMC members review and vote on this incubator release.
>
> Apache Myne
++1
> On May 14, 2016, at 9:18 PM, drugg...@primary.net wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> I've been having a lot of great F2F talks the past few days at the con and
> Marvin has talked me into throwing my hat in the ring to help with the
> incubator project. So, yeah - I'm game to help where I can (and by s
C (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
>
> None
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> * Both user and dev mailing lists activity increased
> * We sustain a high level of activity on the pull request cycles (submit,
>review, ...)
me me me
> On May 19, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> Hi folks!
>
> We (a bunch of ASF people and then some) are looking for a champion for
> a new podling proposal called Pony Mail. Unfortunately, the original
> champion had to bow out due to time constraints, so we are looking for a
I am trying to align the list of initial committers with
the list of current/active contributors, according to
Github, and I am seeing people proposed who have not
contributed anything and people NOT proposed who seem
to be kinda active...
Sooo. -0
> On May 25, 2016, at 4:24 PM, Jean-Baptiste
Required Resources:
>
>Mailing lists:It would be rude not too, given this project should
> archive them.
>
>Subversion Directory:Nope
>
>Git Repositories:
>- incubator-ponymail.git - incubator-ponymail-site.git
>
>Issue Tracking: JIRA or GitHub Is
> appear on the initial committer list.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 05/26/2016 05:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I am trying to align the list of initial committers with
>> the list of current/active contributors, according to
>> Github, and I am seeing people pro
Looking at:
http://madlib.incubator.apache.org/community.html
I am not sure I like the statement that:
"including both individuals and institutions. Amongst our current
contributors:"
and then a list of entities.
There are only individuals who contribute. Not institutions. In other
wo
orical" not
> "current.
>
> -Greg
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Looking at:
>>
>>http://madlib.incubator.apache.org/community.html
>>
>> I am not sure I like the statement that:
>>
>>"i
I am sorry but it really seems that some PPMCs make it all the
way through graduation without still groking some basic tenets
of the Apache Way. There are some still in the Incubator which
seem to still have issues.
I started a list of such projects and there are common patterns
related to where t
owledge past history of the project.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Part of the incubation process is to fully embrace the tenets of the
>> Apache Way; considering that MADlib started in Sept 2015 and it is
>> now Ju
+1 (binding)
> On Jun 2, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Christopher Collins wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache
> Mynewt 0.9.0. Given that it is version 0.x, it is still a bit of a beta.
> This is the third release candidate for Mynewt 0.9.0 (rc3).
kewl. +1
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to discuss the proposal of a new project to the Incubator.
>
> Traffic Control is a CDN control plane that was open sourced in April of
> 2015.
>
> The Proposal is pasted below and can be found on the
> On Aug 9, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>
> Personally, I feel like those types of files definitely need to be
> included in the SGA.
> After all, Pivotal did own the modifications on top of the pristine PG
> source and it is
> important for the company to explicitly signal dona
If you think I would be of help as a mentor, add me too...
Understand if we are getting to too large a number though.
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 5:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>> ...If you need an additional Mentor w
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> wrote:
>> ...Better have a hard core set of mentors from the beginning than having a
>> bunch of people that will quit during incubation, IMHO...
>
> Ok, ok,
e side) at all... AND
that this information was ONLY brought out during a thread on
board@ about TAC.
Hopefully this clarifies my comments.
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 4:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 27, 2
I see no harm either... my concern was transparency and expectations. Nothing
more. For something as complex as the NetBeans proposal we need to make sure
these are clear from the start, imo
On 2016-09-27 18:58 (-0400), Ate Douma wrote:
> On 2016-09-28 00:50, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > Sorry
any of the mentors.
Please understand my comments from THAT PoV.
On 2016-09-27 18:39 (-0400), Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > I would have assumed that if Netbeans stakeholders had any issues
> > or question, or requests for clari
On 2016-09-28 05:20 (-0400), Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote:
>
> @Roman: If you step back and re-read the statement, maybe you can follow my
> first intuition that this could actually be seen as praise to the person who
> brought this issue up despite not being officially affiliated/ involved with
t; 25. *Wade Chandler* (Independent, working on Groovy support)
> 26. Zoran Sevarac (plugins for teaching/education)
>
> * Individual contributors from NetBeans plugin developers.
>1. Georgia Ingham (JavaFX PDF viewer plugin from IDR Solut
I see that this is a proposal that originates, basically from IBM.
I have an issue, based on past history, related to IBM's continued
efforts and dedication on ASF projects. I will not mention specific
projects, but the ASF has a number of projects which died (or
almost died and only were revived
+1 (binding)
> On Oct 21, 2016, at 7:03 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - name includes incubating
> - hashes and signatures good
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good (nice work there!)
> - No unexpected binary files
> - all source file have ASF hea
Cool.
+1
> On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache
> RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable, scalable, distributed, easy to use
> message-oriented middleware, especially for processing large amounts of
> streamin
+1
> On Dec 20, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Nazeer: Sure I will move them as suggested.
>
> Up to you, but I’d leave the LIENSE and NOTICE in the war file and make
> copies of them at the top level.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> --
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 8:46 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So to point out, release vote threads are open *at least* 72 hours. There
> is no reason to add an extra 48 hours to the vote, it'll close when it
> passes
That's not quite 100% true... The vote doesn't "auto-close" once
the requ
+1 (binding)
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 3:33 AM, Nazeer Shaik wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We are extending voting time for another 48 hrs as we didn't get any
> response. Request you to review and vote for this release.
>
> Thanks,
> Nazeer
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Nazeer Shaik
> wrote:
>
its
> subsidiaries and associated companies are unable to exercise control or
> ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information
> contained in e-mail transmissions. Before opening any attachments, please
> check.
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jim J
+1
> On Dec 27, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 12/22/2016 01:38 AM, Mike Jumper wrote:
>> Hello Incubator PMC,
>>
>> The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
>> release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating.
>>
-1 for dropping.
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 12:22 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I'm calling to vote on a proposed policy change. Current guide at [1]
> indicates that maven artifacts should include incubator (or incubating) in
> the version string of maven artifacts. Its labeled as a best p
+1. Thx!
> On Jan 12, 2017, at 7:36 AM, Nazeer Shaik wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> We have closed the Jira issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-357 and created two separate
> jira issues for remaining two items.RAT is integrated such a way it will
> check all directories and files f
+1 (binding)
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 4:18 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Guacamole 0.9.11-incubating.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
> this inc
If you need/want another mentor, I volunteer
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> Hi
> Well I don't see issues as no one discuss the proposal.
> So I will start the official vote tomorrow.
> Cheers
> Olivier
>
> On 6 February 2017 at 14:08, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hello eve
+1 (binding)
> On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:24 PM, will sanfilippo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release
> Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1. We now kindly request that the
> Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release.
>
> A
+1 (binding)
> On Feb 17, 2017, at 12:33 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Gobblin" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator.
> The full proposal is available below, and is also available in the wiki:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Gobb
> On Mar 21, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
>
>
> I've attached a new version of the resolution below with the WHEREAS
> attached. Do I need to restart the vote?
>
For completeness I would, yes, in a whole new VOTE thread.
ty of the Apache Fineract Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Fineract Project:
>
> * Vishwas Babu AJ
> * Edward Cable
> * Markus Geiss
> * Sande
This proposal looks like something I'd be interested in helping
out with... some basic questions: (1) How does the compare/contrast
w/ Apache Kafka and (2) What is seen as the most applicable use-case
for Pulsar?
Funny aside: the 1st new car I ever bought with my own money was
a Nissan Pulsar. It
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> ...Funny aside: the 1st new car I ever bought with my own money was
>> a Nissan Pulsar. It was a piece of crap :)...
>
> Apache Pulsar (in
> contribution wise).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Jim Jagielski
+1 (binding)
And an offer to mentor if you would like/want another.
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 1:02 PM, Felix Cheung wrote:
>
> +1 (nonbinding)
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:13 PM Jeff Feng wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Thank you for checking out our proposal on Superset and for your
>> con
Han + 1
> Julian Hyde +1
> Jitendra Pandey +1
> Joe Witt +1
> Ted Dunning +1
> P. Taylor Goetz +1
> Edward Yoon +1
> Jacques Nadeau +1
> Julian Le Dem +1
> Jim Jagielski +1
>
> *Non-Binding:*
> Moon Soo Lee +1
> Naresh Agarwal +1
> Felix Cheng +1
>
>
To be clear, yes, I would.
> On May 5, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> Anyone else interested in mentoring?
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 1, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I had a discussion with Joe and another gentleman
li -
> * Joe Francis -
> * Rajan Dhabalia -
> * Sahaya Andrews Albert -
> * Maurice Barnum -
> * Ludwig Pummer -
> * Jai Asher -
> * Siddharth Boobna -
> * Nozomi Kurihara -
> * Yuki Shiga -
> * Masakazu Kitajo -
> * Sebastián Schepens -
> * Brad
I don't think it matters... People use their @a.o emails for
various reasons, as well as NOT use them for various reasons.
I don't think we should 2nd guess or, even worse, intrude on
people's ind. email practices, IMO.
> On May 20, 2017, at 7:05 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> Dumb question time.
> On May 22, 2017, at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> Whimsy auto-subscribe only allows committers to use their ASF address
> or the ones listed in thei LDAP record.
>
That seems, to me, a restriction that Whimsy should fix...
None of my subscriptions to any private PMC lists that I'm on
are with
+1
(if you would like another PMC member to join to help w/
the transition and post-graduation community hurdles, I volunteer).
> On May 23, 2017, at 2:24 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> with my mentor hat on, I wanted to kick off this discussion
> thread on the basis of a general conse
Count me in!
> On May 24, 2017, at 12:19 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> +1
>> (if you would like another PMC member to join to help w/
>> the transition and post-graduation community hurdles, I volunteer).
>
chair
> of the Apache MADlib Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache MADlib Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to ser
I am :)
> On May 31, 2017, at 1:54 PM, Otto van der Schaaf wrote:
>
> +jimjag (we recently met ApacheCon, he may be interested in helping with this
> effort)
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:24 PM Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi Incubator folks,
>
> This is an initial heads up about bringing the mod_
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 3:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:52 PM, aditi hilbert wrote:
>> Please vote on the resolution..
>
> +1 for graduation, but isn't this too restrictive?
>
>> software related to
>> an embedded OS optimized for networking and built for
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 10:01 PM, dongeforever <1018815...@qq.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
I'm also wondering with the whole debate is about...
It looks to me that Chris did everything all he was supposed
to do and did it correctly. So what's the big deal?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.o
Another thing that the IPMC will likely have issues with is
the list format of the initial members... The format should
be
* Full Name
eg:
* Bruce Snyder
> On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:34 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi Von Gosling,
>
> A few concerns pop up on my side when looking at this.
nd be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
> appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Guacamole
> Project:
>
> * Carl Harris
> * Daniel Gruno
> * Frode Langelo
> * Greg Trasuk
sted immediately below be and hereby are
> appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Guacamole
> Project:
>
> * Carl Harris
> * Daniel Gruno
> * Frode Langelo
> * Greg Trasuk
> * James Muehlner
> * Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Nozomi Kurihara wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Though 72 hours has passed,
>
> the vote is still open for at least 3 binding +1s.
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/wiki/Release-process#9-run-the-vote-on-incubator
>
>
> Could you please check and vote if
+1 (binding)
> On Jan 8, 2018, at 1:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire
> [ ] +/- 0 to retire
>
+1
> On Feb 3, 2018, at 6:44 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote:
>
> Dear Apache Incubator Community,
>
> Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DubboProposal
>
-
To uns
+1
> On Feb 8, 2018, at 8:41 AM, yukon wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Apache RocketMQ has received a donation of RocketMQ CPP SDK.
>
> RocketMQ CPP SDK is a stable, widely used C++ client SDK of Apache
> RocketMQ, for Linux and Windows platform. It supports full features of
> RocketMQ Java client and
+1 (binding)
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 1:28 PM, YiZhi Liu wrote:
>
> Just remind that the voting is ongoing. Please help to verify whether
> the release candidate meets the standard and vote accordingly.
>
> 2018-02-13 23:37 GMT-08:00 YiZhi Liu :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As we have updated the LICENSE fil
+1 (binding)
> On Mar 2, 2018, at 3:17 AM, Andrews Sahaya Albert
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> - Verified signatures
> - Ran simple producer & consumer against the binary distribution
> - Compiled the src distribution, ran unit tests and ran sample
> producer/consumer test against it
> - OS version: Mac
If still looking for mentors, I'll throw my hat in.
> On Mar 9, 2018, at 1:19 PM, kishore g wrote:
>
> @John, will start that process asap.
>
> @Felix Yes, we are looking for mentors. I can remove myself since I will be
> actively participating the project anyways.
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8
I am also going to vote -1 for the same reason. It seems to me that
simply fixing this issue is all that's required for a successful RC3 and GA.
> On Mar 31, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> -1 binding as NOTICE should not contain copyrights of bundled 3rd party
> software. T
Would it be possible to generate a short list of all current
mentors for all current podlings to see how many podlings
each mentor is signed up for? That would be a good metric
to know.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr..
> On Apr 1, 2018, at 9:35 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> If bundled bits never affect the NOTICE file, why is there a concern
> about minimising the NOTICE contents?
>
Let's consider the "touch points" between what we release and
the downstream user and consumer eco-system. For these
entities, the 3
> On Apr 1, 2018, at 10:48 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> I don't think that is true; I think bundled bits can affect the NOTICE
> file (albeit perhaps rarely).
That is my position as well, fwiw.
First of all, one cannot "veto" a release, so a -1 vote on a release
is not, really, a blocker. One can still do the release; but it does
indicate a lack of consensus within the (P)PMC that the release
is in a "releasable" state.
> On Apr 1, 2018, at 7:19 PM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>
> Although
+1
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:45 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> Has anyone here taught someone how to fish? (Or how to make cookies, or ski?)
>
> Mostly you just stand off, watching what they do. If you see them about to
> screw up in a big way, step in. Occasionally, offer them hints for how they
>
+1 (binding)
> On Apr 20, 2018, at 2:02 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
>
> Hello IPMC,
> The Traffic Control PMC would like to call a vote to graduate from the
> incubator to a top level Apache project! The traffic control community has
> voted to graduate [1], voted on our resolution [2], and opened a
+1 (binding)
> On May 11, 2018, at 7:09 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> This is the third release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version
> 2.0.0-rc1-incubating.
>
> Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on
> commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over t
If it is part of a releasable artifact, then source needs to be provided.
> On May 14, 2018, at 2:16 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure about a specific policy, but sources by definition aren't the
>> binaries. Sources combine with a
I can see the IPMC being responsible for IP clearance for new incoming podlings
and current podlings.
For code being donated directly to a current TLP, they should be able to do all
that is required to ensure correct clearance and provenance.
In other words, unless the code is for a podling, th
> On Jun 5, 2018, at 4:53 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> ...In other words, unless the code is for a podling, the IPMC shouldn't be
>> involved, IMHO
>
> But it's good to have a cen
+1 (if not too late) - binding
> On Jun 7, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Jai Asher wrote:
>
> This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar, patch release
> version 1.22.1-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/milestone/15?closed=1
>
> *** Ple
very, VERY cool!
> On Nov 19, 2014, at 9:02 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project.
>
> In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the
> proposal can be found here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal
>
> T
I was wondering... What we *REALLY* want are projects
that are interested more in The Apache Way than in the
Apache Brand. We need to make it more clear, somehow,
that new projects want to enter the ASF because they
approve of, and want to follow, the *how* of creating
projects and communities. Lat
Aren't there loads and loads of presos, webinars, slides
etc from various ApacheCons and other FOSS conf's which
detailed the Apache Way?
> On Dec 22, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> What we *
> On Dec 23, 2014, at 1:17 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> On 12/22/14, 10:35 AM, "Louis Suárez-Potts" wrote:
>
>>
>>> On 22 Dec 2014, at 11:29, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> Aren't there loads and loads of presos, webinars, slides
> What is "The Apache Way"? No one can say.
>
> There is no bounded set of expectations that an Apache project must fulfill.
>
> Where do Apache's official policies begin and end? Which best practices
> must be mastered? What will be enforced, what will be ignored?
>
> Every last podling gra
> On Jan 9, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> What is "The Apache Way"? No one can say.
>>>
>>> There is no bounded set of expectations that an Apache project must f
And fwiw, maybe the reason directors are chosen to
represent members is because they *do* understand what
the Apache Way is...
Personally, I'm shocked, saddened and disappointed that
this conversation is even happening, since it really
clearly shows the depth of the dysfunction.
-
Please tell me where the examples you give diverge or conflict?
> On Jan 9, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> And I think that someone who is an ASF member who claims that
>> the Apache Way i
As mention in a previous thread, all the particulars of what
encompasses the Apache Way was learned from years of experience,
based on learning what works and what doesn't, usually after
some painful semi-disasters. They don't exist because we love
process nor are they something a bunch of old-time
> On Jan 9, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/09/2015 02:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Another way to look at the Apache Way is as a musical composition.
>> Sure, it was written for a specific arrangement, but sometimes
>> it's pl
> On Jan 10, 2015, at 3:04 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>> On 01/09/2015 02:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> Another way to look at the Apache Way is as a musical composition.
>>> Sure, i
If we go that route, I'll "own" it, since it makes
sense as a VP Legal responsibility in a lot of ways.
> On Jan 13, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Perhaps it is time we hired a contractor to draw up the one document of
>>
>
> Perhaps it is time we hired a contractor to draw up the one document of truth?
>
My thoughts are that Sally certainly groks the Apache Way, and
knows who to contact for more detailed info and clarification.
Why not add this as a task to HALO, and put some $$$ towards
it?
---
Will do :)
> On Jan 13, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
> wrote:
>
> Even better suggestion. Do you want to take it up with Sally directly? (and
> big thanks in advance)
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________
> F
>
> Please assign me this task.
>
This is a do-ocracy. Just do it :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
These are all different vehicles for different things.
The SGA is basically a formal code-donation to the ASF. It
provides deep IP provenance.
A CCLA is a document that sez that a company is aware that its
employee(s) is/are working on Apache projects and that they
(the company) is OK with that.
601 - 700 of 828 matches
Mail list logo
