Hi!
an ASF member Jean-Louis Monteiro has
volunteered recently to join the Incubator PMC.
Welcome, Jean-Louis! Great to have you on board!
Please make sure to subscribed yourself to the
IPMC MLs and also feel free to let us know a
surprising thing or two about yourself ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
-
Hi!
an ASF member Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli has
volunteered recently to join the Incubator PMC.
Welcome, Vinod! Great to have you on board!
Please make sure to subscribed yourself to the
IPMC MLs and also feel free to let us know a
surprising thing or two about yourself ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
--
Hi!
an ASF member Romain Manni-Bucau has
volunteered recently to join the Incubator PMC.
Welcome, Romain! Great to have you on board!
Please make sure to subscribed yourself to the
IPMC MLs and also feel free to let us know a
surprising thing or two about yourself ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
--
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Abiola A Balogun wrote:
> +1 (binding
>
> John Appleseed ( A A Balogun)
>
> On Jul 2, 2014, at 22:16, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>> On 01/07/14 06:16, Hitesh Shah wrote:
>> Hello folks
>>
>> Tez entered incubation i
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. Best of luck, guys!
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Westmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Apache VXQuery podling has been active for a while [1] and its community
> agrees that it is ready to graduate from the incubator to be TLP.
> The podling has a relatively sm
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
>> For various reasons, I am probably going to have to cut back on my Incubator
>> time for a spell. Others are going to have to step up their game.
>
> Hi folks,
>
> FYI, produ
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> So - one of the podlings did not file a report, but one of the mentors
> did fill it in. Am I correct in assuming this would still count as a
> missed report?
My personal take would be to accept it but note the tardiness.
Thanks,
Roman.
--
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> * Graduations
>
> The board has motions for the following:
>
> Tez
I believe Celix has also submitted its motion.
> * Miscellaneous
>
> S4 voted to retire. SGA received for Optiq from DynamoBI
> Corporation.
> Discussion
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:01 PM, ant elder wrote:
> Right, and thats why i don't think a rule like that would be useful.
I still don't quite follow. Are you saying that the rule wouldn't
be useful, or that incubator -> attic migration wouldn't be?
> If Droids was made to retire the code would be
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> On 09/07/2014 09:12, "Chris Douglas" wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> Again, why would code lose users? Remember we're talking
>>> about a situation of no rele
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:18 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I think its something like "If a podling is over a year old and not
> done a release then retire it".
Almost. What is being proposed is not an immediate retirement,
but rather a vote. So it should really read: "If a podling is over a
year old an
Hi!
The Apache Incubator PMC has VOTEd to add
Konstantin Boudnik AKA Cos to our ranks.
Welcome, Cos! Great to have you on board!
Please let us know a surprising thing or two
about yourself.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in.
>> Is there any reason not to use attic for hibernated podlings?
>
> I am not sure
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> Since REEF is a library that makes it easy to write distributed
> applications on top of Apache YARN or Mesos, the Apache Software Foundation
> is the perfect home for hosting REEF.
[ snip...snip...snip ]
> ## Relationships with Other
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Looks good to me. I just copied general@ since I missed that they fell
> off. So yeah, whenever we can send it out.
Thanks for consistently helping with the report -- this
is extremely appreciated (especially by a guy who's
just came back
Looks like the feedback has been well received.
Any reason not to start a vote?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> Hi Jake,
>
> Thank you for the comment.
>
> We had discussions on how to structure mailing lists with our mentors.
> We took our mentors' sugge
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 1:46 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have been reading in depth about the role distribution used in incubator.
> First let me say this is the most precise documentation I have seen in any
> of the projects I have looked at (a BIG "job well done"; to the people who
> made that).
PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>> > On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> >> That's actually the part of the thread t
Seems like attachments are eaten away by general@
Including the patch bellow
Index: content/guides/retirement.xml
===
--- content/guides/retirement.xml (revision 1617182)
+++ content/guides/retirement.xml (working copy)
@@ -64,6 +64,7
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of
>> documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews
>> as source code donations?...
>
> IMO ye
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> ...Including the patch below...
>
> Sorry to come in late but I had a look at [1] and it's way too
> complicated IMO, and I don't think the pr
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion
> has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> The proposal is attached below, and it is also available at
Sorry about that -- I reviewed their report on the ML,
but somehow never got around to updating the wiki.
Done!
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. Now reviewing the overall report...
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:23 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi HDT!
>
> Looks like you're the last hold out. Any chance a mentor
Hi!
an ASF member Jan Iversen has volunteered
recently to join the Incubator PMC.
Welcome, Jan! Great to have you on board!
Please make sure to subscribed yourself to the
IPMC MLs and also feel free to let us know a
surprising thing or two about yourself.
Thanks,
Roman.
---
Hi!
I've committed the first cut and updated the website. I'm also
adding a special section to the incubator report calling
out projects where we would require a readout from the
mentors.
I would really appreciate if others can help with making
the docs crisper, etc.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Aug
Hi!
I was wondering whether the mentor community
for the Droids projects can help shed some light
on the lack of releases in the project. The last
release was done close to two years ago.
Also, given that the project has been incubating
for close to four years it would be very useful
to know what
Hi!
reading this months report on Kalumet
felt like the project may be close to
graduation.
What can we do to help push it over the
finish line?
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 4:14 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> One of the issues raised by droids was their name search. I volunteered on
> their list to help them with the name search.
Sure. And I really appreciate you helping them with that struggle.
Still it doesn't explain the lack of released. He
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 4:11 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Roman,
>
> Personally, from reading through Kalumet's status and looking at their
> mailing lists, no I don't think they're quite ready to graduate.
>
> - Long time since last release.
> - Currently had many issues with packaging files in nex
Hi!
I was hoping that other mentors (who were explicitly CCed)
would reply, but apparently Richard is the last mentor standing.
Although we can wait for a week or so more (after all, vacations
are in full swing right now) I think it is time for me to ask
this question: Richard, do think that with
Hi!
in my never ending quest to help boost the
graduation rate I've come across a few cases
where I had to reach out to project mentors.
Typically the initial list would be around 3
individuals, but the reply would only come
from a single one.
I believe we owe it to the projects to monitor
whethe
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I'm not sure that I'm comfortable with the fact that all of your source
> code is under net.hydromatic.optiq rather than org.apache.optiq. Your
> apache headers also look a bit weird. Every other apache licensed that
> I've seen looks like
Is this meant to structure the report wiki page?
If so -- I love this!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Here's a first sketch of a YAML based incubator report
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportFormat
>
> I'm writing some tooling for editing and
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> but its just my opinion, and if incubator is used to work differently, I
>> will not be the one to propose big changes.
>
> This is pretty much how it works now. As I mentioned above, I am merely
> proposing
> that we use a more structur
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Lookse like we need to update podling.xml. The August report states 31. My
> tooling states 33
This type of discrepancy typically happens when the vote that gets
project in (and out) of incubator winds up too close to the report
submiss
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Incubator Folks,
>
> My understanding is that changes to a website like flex.a.o don't require
> a release vote, even though one could consider and html file pushed to the
> site as publishing source beyond the group that owns it.
>
> But wha
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just want to point out that lack of activity may mean lack of issues that
> need dealing with not that a mentor gone awol.
Right. And that's why technical side of things (like YAMLizing report, etc.) is
a prerequisite for enabling
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This strikes me very similar to providing access to daily SNAPSHOT binary
>> artifacts. I would argue that labeling it appropriately is all you
>> need.
> Except that is this case the intended audience of the application is users.
I
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>>> but its just my opinion, and if incubator is used to work differently, I
>&g
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:05 AM, wrote:
> Surely we are not going to start counting signing off on a report as
> indicative of good/bad mentoring?
Not. But what I'm going to start with is this: reflect
on the Incubator Wiki is the statistics on poddlings
who receive NO mentor sign-off at all.
Hi!
it looks like September report is almost done,
except the following podlings:
* Streams
[ ](streams) Matt Franklin
[ ](streams) Ate Douma
[ ](streams) Craig McClanahan
* Falcon
[ ](falcon) Alan Gates
[ ](falcon) Chris Douglas
[ ](falcon) Devaraj Das
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 08-09-14 06:57, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> it looks like September report is almost done,
>> except the following podlings:
>>* Streams
>>[ ](streams) M
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Filled in a fair bit. I can’t get back to fill in the rest of the bits until
> later this afternoon.
Thanks!!! What I see on the wiki right now looks very reasonable. I'll
do the final pass tomorrow and send the report.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Not sure if serious or calling Roman and Marvin youngin's
Who's he calling a youngin? In Soviet Russia my first computer
played on me!
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe,
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry but it's -1 (binding) from me. Everything is good except that the
>> jQuery has had an Apache license header added to it. (in
>> ./html5-ui/js/jquery-1.11.0.min.js) If o
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Not saying anything on the proposal itself, I would be concerned because
> of the name Silk.
> There is this:
> http://lucidworks.com/product/integrations/silk/
> which is related to Apache Solr and Lucene and also gets some attention.
Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
(that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
code bases written "before my time"):
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> OK. I will give you my personal opinion since you are seeking to d
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Ignite" for Apache
> Incubator.
> The full proposal is available below. We ask the IPMC to sponsor it, with cos
> as Champion, and stack, rvs, cos, hsaputra and brane volunteering to be
Hi!
I am just wondering if this month I'll be as lucky
as the previous few and could rely on excellent
work of report manager volunteers to fill out the
October report.
As usual, the most tricky bit is chasing all the poddling
releases.
Thanks,
Roman.
---
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Markus Weimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you please give me (MarkusWeimer) write access to the wiki to file the
> REEF monthly report?
Done. Please see if it works for you now.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To uns
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Reza wrote:
> I also need wiki access to update the DeviceMap report.
Done!
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gen
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Sharad Agarwal wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread
> https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45208.html
> I would like to call a Vote for accepting Lens as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Harald Kraemer
wrote:
> So, after this wall of text, there are two questions from me:
>
> a) is this project interesting enough for everyone? :)
> b) Are there people who would volunteer to coach me and my team through the
> proposal and the incubator?
This sounds
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I'm happy to do it again.
Thanks!!!
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apac
Hi!
seems like the wiki is down right when I need
to put finishing touches on the report and send
it out to the board. If anybody has better luck
accessing:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2014
would you be so kind as to send me the textual
version of it?
Thanks,
Roman.
-
Great! Got it! Filing report right now...
P.S. Still, I guess wiki needs to be addressed.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> seems like the wiki is down right when I need
> to put finishing touches on the report and send
> it out to the board.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> Netty's artifacts ("its distribution") do not include a notice. Thus,
>
> They most certainly do. Please download the distribution of Netty 4.0.20:
>
> https://github.com/netty/netty/relea
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
>> You are confusing different distributions. Netty provides a source
>> distribution which does include a NOTICE file. Netty also provides binary
>> (jar) distributions. These do not include a NOTICE file.
>
> I think this is a fair question.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:16 AM, sebb wrote:
> I don't think that's correct.
Well, since neither of us is a lawyer (at least I am not) at this
point we're debating interpretations on ALv2.
> A source distribution with NOTICE may be included in an ASF binary
> distribution - e.g. example code is
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote:
>
>> >> Any redistribution must obey the licensing requirements of the contents
>>
>> so you are right that our binary redistributions need to be checked as
>> well, but as far as in
OpenSource Project Name Checker:
https://github.com/LogIN-/ospnc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45241.html
>
> I would like to call a Vote for accepting Taverna as a new incubator
> project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 21.10.2014 06:34, Alex Harui wrote:
>> What is the piece I’m missing that says we have to vote to update the
>> binary package?
>
> Apparently the Flex community believes that convenience binaries need
> votes. They don't, but aside from th
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
> I had the wrong link in here as well as non-Apache emails. Here's the
> correct information.
>
> Correct link to PPMC vote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAJkA4MF%2B5tWRaoGiimpjB_ixbCQFY%3Dq2oEtz
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>>> P.S.: Why anyone would think voting on binaries makes any kind of sense
>>> around here is, of course, a different question. I can't even
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> I think we should open another separate thread to continue the
> diversity discussions without hijacking RESULT thread for Drill.
Great point.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubsc
Todd Lipcon (t...@apache.org)
== Affiliations ==
* Colin McCabe - Cloudera
* Elliott Clark - Facebook
* Jonathan Leavitt - Google
* Masatake Iwasaki - NTTData
* Michael Stack - Cloudera
* Nick Dimiduk - Hortonworks
* Todd Lipcon - Cloudera
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Roman Shapo
Hi Ross,
first of all: thanks for stepping in -- much appreciated!
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Ripple is struggling to build community and recently discussed whether it
> ought to retire or not.
> One member of the community has stepped forwards to ens
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Anatole,
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Anatole Tresch wrote:
>> ...The current proposal is available on GitHub:
>> https://github.com/java-config/javaconfig-api/blob/master/src/main/asciidoc/incubator-proposal-tamaya.adoc
>>
great point on the wording: I'll update the proposal.
Finally, since I'm currently on vacation, I'll let this thread
go for a little longer and will start the official VOTE in a few
days.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> the code inside is all org.htrace; changing that would be painful for both
> the developers and the current users
Sure. But we'd have to migrate to org.apache anyway -- I don't think
it matters then.
> who owns htrace.org?
I believe it bel
Thanks for voting. The vote passes as follows:
+1 (binding): Tom White,
Patrick Hunt
Alan Gates
+1 (non binding): Roman Shaposhnik,
Konstantin Boudnik,
Johnny
osed board resolution below.
[1] http://s.apache.org/SGm
[2] http://s.apache.org/LOA
Thanks,
Roman Shaposhnik
X. Establish the Apache Bigtop Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation&#x
apache.org
* Stephen Chu s...@apache.org
* Bruno Mahébm...@apache.org
* Peter Linnell plinn...@apache.org
* James Page jamesp...@apache.org
* Patrick Taylor Ramsey p...@apache.org
addition to that the following is the tally of non-binding votes:
7 +1 votes
Avik Dey
Suresh Marru
Jakob Homan
Edward J. Yoon
Bruno Mahé
Bhandarkar, Milind
Roman Shaposhnik
0 +0 votes
0 -1 votes
The VOTE threads for this can be found at [1].
I will proceed by
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, kishore g wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting Helix for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. I have pasted the full proposal below.
+1 (not binding)
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscr
Hi!
ever since Bigtop has incubated I've been thinking
about the experience that I've had and that it would
be very nice if I could help the new projects at least
1/10th the amount of help I received from some of the
mentors.
Also, seeing a steady stream of graduating projects
I would imagine tha
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> But great suggestion Luciano (to use all the incumbent IPMC to help more
> while experiences are fresh).
> My personal opinion is, the easiest way to look for projects needing help is
> during releases. If a project
> comes to general list w
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> I guess I would encourage you to do as Luciano suggests, and to chat to
> mentors on a project that you might help with.
Great. Lets make it practical -- there's a Helix project that is currently
being proposed for incubation. I'm very much inte
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> You go and help the community out in general and, when it comes time
> for a release, you do all the things a regular mentor would do. If
> you catch issues with the release, this will be a big help. No one is
> going to ignore your assistan
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> My point is only that I'd prefer to give Roman, and people like him, a
> +1 on the IPMC (assuming people vouch for him) than have someone else
> voting +1 on a release without doing appropriate due diligence.
If that's the easiest practical r
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Adam Berry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Below is a proposal for a new incubator project. This idea came out of and
> had strong support on
> the general hadoop list, see the thread at
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201209.mbox/browser.
>
> We ar
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC has VOTEd to add Roman Shaposhnik to our ranks.
>
> Welcome, Roman! Feel free to say a bit about yourself.
Thanks Chris!
I'm extremely excited and honored to join the
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> The key id (EB686AF9) is not available from the standard PGP servers.
>>
>
> I've added the key to the pgp keyserver (http://keyserver.pgp.com/) when I
> created it. Searching via the key shows me the correct entry. Is ther
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I want to thank all of you for the vote(s) of confidence in recommending me
> as the IPMC chair. While it's always possible that the Board will decline
> the suggestion, it doesn't seem too terribly presumptuous to start looking
> ahead.
>
rces ===
> * Jenkins/Hudson for builds and test running.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Adam Berry (amberry at yahoo-inc dot com)
> * Jeffrey Zemerick (jeffrrey at mtnfog dot com)
> * Evert Lammert
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Eric Charles wrote:
> Yes, the 11 components are unrelated, but I just find the release process
> such a pain that I fear to go to independent lifecycle.
I think the real question is whether you'd expect different sub-communities
of developers tending to them, or w
||| Hi all,
|||
||| I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
||| The last few months we have been working on this release.
||| Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
||| files into the correct place etc.
|||
||| The source release file and signatu
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Trademarks are fundamentally about consumers - not about the project leaders
> or committers.
At the risk of stating the obvious, this also points to a
"Googleability of a name"
issue (although with Apache prefix this is typically less of a c
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for looking into the release!
>
>
>> -1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
>> (http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
>> 61 Unknown Licenses.
>>
>> Here's what I would like to s
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I am submitting a proposal that has been open for discussion for some
> days (with the former name of Mayhem), so now submitting for a vote
> for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
>
> Vote will b
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Benson / Jukka -
>
> I'm waiting for my shepherd assignments.
If there are any reports that need reviewing -- count me in!
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. I've added my name to the shepherd wiki page
-
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Furthermore, I have created a exclude file for RAT which excludes these
> files. I still have to add it to SVN though..
Great. Please make it available in SVN so that I can review.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Droids seems to be a really easy shepherding assignment. They are on
> the watch list for low activity, they are self-aware of this, and they
> are having a conversation with the commons TLP about perhaps becoming
> a component there. I do
Hi!
while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
Turns out, this is the output of gpg and it seems that
there's no way to ask gpg to verify it (u
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> What does gpg --verify do?
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html
It verifies the GPG sig (as it should). I wasn't able to
find (well, by spending 2 minutes searching through
the man page on my Linux) an easy way to ask it
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> (Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
>
> Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
> It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable format.
And this is the crux of the question -- what IS suitable format?
Perso
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, permit me to ask another, related, question. It seems to me that
> the IPMC is concerned with the fact that a project is ready to leave,
> but not so much which where it is going. A proposal to form a new TLP
> is, I think, a straightf
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Personally, I find it difficult to verify the GPG generated checksums.
>
> Ditto. It's particularly awkward when the hash is wrapped over several lines.
>
> I ended up writing a Perl script to handle all the variations.
>
>> If I'm not alone perhaps
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
> have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use different
> formats, I personally don't see this as a show stopper for our current
> release..
>
> C
101 - 200 of 993 matches
Mail list logo
