On 8 April 2011 06:42, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer,
and website logo/text) are all fixed and I just created RC3. There'are
only changes of text, no changes at the code level.
On 3 May 2011 14:25, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Simo, I guess you are referring to:
Use iss...@commons.apache.org' for Jira change notification
I am +1
Likewise, +1
Cheers
Christian
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Specifically, here:
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
but again I don't see your name
On 3 June 2011 01:59, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Philip,
please check here - http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
I don't think i see your name there
--
On 3 June 2011 02:44, Phillip Rhodes motley.crue@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:00 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Specifically, here:
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
but again I don't see your name
Actually, it is there. It's just under my
On 3 June 2011 10:20, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
These days we record exactly what is in the first line of the ICLA: Sidney
Phillip Rhodes. Both in the iclas.txt and the name of the document
On 23 April 2013 18:05, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
Not so fast about dispensing with Category B requirements for pointers to
source code.
Thank you for the specific information about the MPL.
Please see:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage -second sentence in the cell to
the right of the Incubator image.
On 24 April 2013 15:13, james pruett gpscru...@gmail.com wrote:
I am suggesting a new project.
Step 1 said create an account which I did.
Step 2 said to create a
On 25 April 2013 11:17, Matthieu Morel mmo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
we didn't get any extra vote, so the release is stalled.
Sebb pointed out that the source release includes the javadoc.
The source archive is supposed to contain only files from the source code
control system (SCCS
On 1 May 2013 06:03, Jordan Zimmerman jor...@jordanzimmerman.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a vote to release Apache Curator 2.0.0-incubating
Link to release notes:
* no release notes as this is the initial release *
However, there is a CHANGES file which details lots of previous releases -
Next time please provide a link to the tag in the source code control
system.
That's needed to trace provenance of the files in the source release.
On 1 May 2013 19:02, Jordan Zimmerman jor...@jordanzimmerman.com wrote:
I've completely misunderstood this process and need to take this back to
On 2 May 2013 07:04, Florian Hopf mailingli...@florian-hopf.de wrote:
Hi all,
The ODF Toolkit 0.6 is ready for release.
We had a successful vote in the PPMC. The PPMC vote result is here:
http://markmail.org/message/**fqikz72pys4qr7pahttp://markmail.org/message/fqikz72pys4qr7pa
We need
, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2013 07:04, Florian Hopf mailingli...@florian-hopf.de wrote:
Hi all,
The ODF Toolkit 0.6 is ready for release.
We had a successful vote in the PPMC. The PPMC vote result is here:
http://markmail.org/message/**fqikz72pys4qr7pa
http://markmail.org
A further wrinkle here is that SVN treats
application/xml
as binary.
To be treated as text, an XML file needs to be
text/xml
or similar, see:
http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#binary-files
On 6 May 2013 10:25, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
After you add a file (and before
Congrats.
However, what is Curator?
The mail does not say anything about it.
Please ensure that any announcement e-mails about Curator include a
brief description of what it is.
On 10 May 2013 17:47, Jordan Zimmerman randg...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
The Apache Curator team is pleased to
On May 11, 2013, at 1:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats.
However, what is Curator?
The mail does not say anything about it.
Please ensure that any announcement e-mails about Curator include a
brief description of what
, but that is not the case for trademarks.
See for example:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#adjective
-JZ
On May 12, 2013, at 5:13 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 May 2013 20:20, Jordan Zimmerman randg...@apache.org wrote:
I've added a description line to the ANNOUNCE sample email
to the article and INTA]
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 3:14 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 May 2013 20:59, Jordan Zimmerman randg...@apache.org wrote:
Respectfully I disagree :) The Sony TV is black is correct because the
noun/object is tv. Curator, is the noun in this case. Curator
at ikayzo dot com (ICLA signed)
* Pedro Giffuni pfg at apache dot org (Committer)
* Peter Jodeleit pejobo70 at gmail dot com (ICLA signed)
* Simone Gianni simoneg at apache dot org (Member)
* Simone Tripodi simonetripodi at apache dot org (Member)
* Sebastian Bazley sebb at apache dot org
On 25 May 2013 20:01, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Vinod Kone vinodk...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating)
version 0.11.0. This will be the third incubator release for Mesos in Apache
.
On 30 May 2013 08:08, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked dormant and nearly
30 marked retired. The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back
in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process
and people
I keep seeing the word Poddling being used in mail and now the Wiki
[1]; however I thought the original and correct name was Podling?
I think we should stick to Podling for all the documentation.
Anyone mind if I rename the Wiki page?
[1]
On 2 June 2013 17:21, a...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adc
Date: Sun Jun 2 16:21:24 2013
New Revision: 1488735
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1488735
Log:
First few utility functions/classes
Also include LinkedIn notice
Added:
incubator/public/trunk/tools/src/asf/utils/
On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Modified: incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt?rev=1488735r1=1488734r2=1488735view=diff
On 3 June 2013 05:10, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...
Apache Incubator tools
Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation
On 3 June 2013 22:40, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2013 05:10, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...
Apache Incubator tools
Copyright 2013
On 3 June 2013 18:43, a...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adc
Date: Mon Jun 3 17:43:51 2013
New Revision: 1489076
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1489076
Log:
Minor sketch of some podling code before I forget to check it in.
And perhaps add some comments explaining what the purpose is?
On 4 June 2013 01:04, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:45 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I think that conflicts with the advice here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
The last sentence says: Do not add anything to NOTICE which
On 21 June 2013 00:59, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hi Ali,
Comments inline.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at:
On 13 July 2013 19:28, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:57:33AM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
A second possibility might be to consolidate `-allow` lists. (I'm not sure
whether this is technically feasible -- it came up yesterday on the infra
list, but the
On 17 July 2013 15:26, kasper...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kaspersor
Date: Wed Jul 17 14:26:41 2013
New Revision: 1504150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504150
Log:
Added wiki page
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/metamodel.xml (contents, props
changed)
On 17 July 2013 22:27, kasper...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kaspersor
Date: Wed Jul 17 21:27:38 2013
New Revision: 1504284
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504284
Log:
Updated source code link
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/metamodel.xml
Modified:
On 22 July 2013 19:34, Alex Tang 2degh...@gmail.com wrote:
Ignasi,
Very much appreciate all the information you provided. I created
myrecipe.rb and tried upload it and received this error when it reached
This is not relevant to the general Incubator list.
Please drop the list in any further
Done
On 5 August 2013 13:57, Huesken, Jens jens.hues...@sap.com wrote:
Hi,
my user name is JensHuesken and I need rights for editing and adding pages at
the Apache Incubator Wiki.
Thanks and best regards,
Jens.
-
To
On 18 August 2013 16:27, dasho...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dashorst
Date: Sun Aug 18 15:27:12 2013
New Revision: 1515136
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1515136
Log:
Added IP clearance for Wicket Guide
snip/
Added:
On 20 August 2013 06:19, Srikanth Sundarrajan srik...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We had recently called for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.3 RC4 (source tar ball)
and the result has been announced (http://s.apache.org/wLO). We intend to
also make a binary tar ball available for user convenience.
On 4 September 2013 02:31, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
I notice that Chris just pointed[1] spark to the nifty keys
listing[1]. Our docs still imply manual maintenance of the typical
KEYS file[2]. Honestly, I didn't even know the ldap-driven one was
around. I assume its fair for
On 15 September 2013 14:16, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:19 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Tim, one of the things we're trying to teach podlings is how to handle
disputes and resolve problems in a happy respectful manner. You've out
of the blue
On 16 September 2013 14:17, Dave Brondsema d...@brondsema.net wrote:
IPMC members, hello again. We are still waiting for your votes to be
cast for Allura's first release: see vote thread Aug portion [1] and
Sept portion [2]
If there is anything the Allura PPMC can provide or do, to help,
Sorry, again forgot:
It's useful to have a link to the RAT report (or equivalent) showing
that files have the appropriate license headers.
On 16 September 2013 23:33, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Forgot to say:
AFAIK, Git tags are not immutable, so the vote e-mail should contain
the hash
On 28 August 2013 23:04, Cory Johns john...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.0 incubating. This is our
first release.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 9 +1's, and 0
-1's or +0's (vote thread [1], discussion thread [2] which
Forgot to say:
AFAIK, Git tags are not immutable, so the vote e-mail should contain
the hash for the tag.
On 16 September 2013 23:30, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 September 2013 14:17, Dave Brondsema d...@brondsema.net wrote:
IPMC members, hello again. We are still waiting for your
On 20 September 2013 21:56, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
(incubating) version 0.8.0. This will be the first incubator release for
Spark in Apache.
The tag to be voted on is v0.8.0-incubating (commit 3b85a85):
On 24 September 2013 10:05, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I closed LEGAL-178 with the resolution Not A Problem, which is quite
different to a resolution of Fixed or Resolved or Answered.
From my investigation, things like the text of the AL and various posts in
the mailing lists over
On 23 September 2013 21:57, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Dave Brondsema d...@brondsema.net wrote:
Do you have a KEYS file posted somewhere besides within the release?
Thanks for a good spot and thoughtful observation, Dave. This is worth
On 24 September 2013 13:44, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating. MRQL is a
query processing and optimization system for large-scale, distributed
data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop, Hama, and Spark.
This is our
.
If there is a need to provide a bundled binary containing 3rd party
jars, that is normally done in the zip/tar.gz archives containing the
various components as individual jars.
Thanks
Leonidas Fegaras
On Sep 26, 2013, at 11:45 AM, sebb wrote:
On 24 September 2013 13:44, Leonidas Fegaras fega
On 1 October 2013 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi all,
Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release has been voted by the Kalumet podling
PMC.
I forward the release to the Incubator for final vote. Please find the
RELEASE NOTES and staging repository in the original
On 30 September 2013 11:17, Sebastian Schaffert sschaff...@apache.org wrote:
Dear all,
After several months of work since the last incubating release
(3.0.0-incubating) in April, we are now ready to release version
3.1.0-incubating. We fixed all the remaining issues that have been
discussed
archives.
For example:
apache-kalumet-0.6-incubating-src.zip
MD5: 5664ebc70172b3b66f17d3a3db48594d
Thanks again Seb for the reminder,
Regards
JB
On 10/01/2013 06:55 PM, sebb wrote:
On 1 October 2013 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi all,
Apache Kalumet 0.6
On 2 October 2013 21:34, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I would like to propose a rewrite of [1] by borrowing heavily from [2]
but
On 27 October 2013 07:40, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks
This is the first release candidate for Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating,
and it is also the first official release for Tajo.
The PPMC vote [1][2] was passed with 5 binding +1s and no -1.
Release git tag is at:
In which case, maybe consider the related words:
Apache Warp
Apache Weft
Just a thought.
On 29 October 2013 22:14, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
And Apache Wave too (which is what I first saw before I read the title
more carefully).
Upayavira
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 09:12 PM, Matt
On 31 October 2013 11:54, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks
This is the third candidate for Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating,
and it is also the first official release for Tajo.
The PPMC vote [1][2] was passed with 4 binding +1s and no -1.
Release git tag is at:
What is your Wiki login name?
On 6 November 2013 00:55, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm requesting access to the incubator wiki in order to update the storm
podling monthly board report.
Thanks in advance.
P. Taylor Goetz
Software Architect
Health Market Science
The
On 9 November 2013 07:06, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
Someday I will get back to improving the Voting and Glossary pages, but
meanwhile, the Apache Flex PMC is still trying to construct a set of
bylaws and we are currently discussing whether there is a difference
between Majority
On 10 November 2013 08:00, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
IMO, there are two problems:
1) We're trying to train folks to manage IP for their community but they
have to seek approval from folks are aren't as vested in their community.
My analogy is telling a new city council member:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there such a concept as Lazy Majority ?
Yes many Apache projects define it (eg Ant, Kafka, Hadoop, Pig, Hive and
others ) as does Apache HTTP. [1]
Lazy majority decides each issue in the release plan.
The phrase
On 19 November 2013 08:29, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...
My guess is that Lazy Majority is used because Majority implies more than
50
On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang zzh...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.7.0-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our fourth
release at Apache.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework
On 19 November 2013 02:50, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.6.2-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our third
release at Apache.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management
I see that 0.7.0 has been released.
However there was no [VOTE][RESULT] mail as far as I can tell.
On 23 November 2013 14:36, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang zzh...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate
On 20 November 2013 13:45, Rahul Sharma rahul0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
(incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
mailing list and the community has approved the second release
candidate(RC1)
On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0
-1's or +0's and now
requires a vote on general@incubator.apache.org.
On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=d12177168347c9253f3b37946c06a7175f8a1997
The parent directory doesn't actually contain any artifacts
On 23 November 2013 20:00, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=37c20e79d0e132710f0fa0e5e8dbdb95b2e639ff
The parent project doesn't produce any binary artifacts that we
] helix-0.7.0-incubating
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:00:09 -0800
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=37c20e79d0e132710f0fa0e5e8dbdb95b2e639ff
The parent project doesn't produce any binary artifacts that we release. Do
] helix-0.6.2-incubating
From: seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h
] helix-0.6.2-incubating
From: seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h
On 26 November 2013 00:33, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello folks,
I have created a tez-0.2.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the
first release for Tez. Therefore, please do not be gentle.
GIT source tag:
On 26 November 2013 22:21, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the review, Sebb,
Have already updated NOTICE.txt in the master branch for future releases and
made a note of the other points in our how to release guide.
Do you recommended starting a new VOTE thread for the re
On 27 November 2013 20:45, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Greets,
In response to Bertrand's proposal at http://s.apache.org/awz, I've created
a draft release verification checklist:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist
It should be emphasized that completing
SNAPSHOT releases are temporary, so I suggest you just delete any that
have been uploaded to to ASF snapshot repo.
Alternatively, change the version to 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT
On 28 November 2013 16:07, Sergio Fernández
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at wrote:
Hi,
in Marmotta we're having now the
On 29 November 2013 21:00, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The NL files also apply to the SCM tree;
Yes, true. Here's a message from Doug Cutting to legal-discuss@apache
on the subject: http://s.apache.org/9r7
I'm not sure why the Incubator needs to be involved at all here.
On 30 November 2013 19:30, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
zero feedback? :-)
On 28 Nov 2013, at 10:50, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Dear Incubator people,
I just added a new proposal for the incubation of
On 1 December 2013 19:09, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure I understand why the checklist needs to be specific.
The checklist should include only items which might block the release of the
artifacts under
On 2 December 2013 13:52, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
...In response to Bertrand's proposal at http://s.apache.org/awz, I've
created
a draft release verification checklist:
On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0
-1's or +0's and now
requires a vote on general@incubator.apache.org.
On 2 December 2013 20:17, Larry McCay lmc...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Thank you again, Sebb.
I am noting your new findings here and will fix them asap for the next
release.
I assume that your lack of an actual vote indicates that these fixes can be
made in the next release and that you
On 2 December 2013 20:44, Kevin Minder kmin...@apache.org wrote:
Sebb,
Thanks for your careful review. I'd like your continued insight into two
specific issues that you have raised.
WRT the NOTICE files in root vs gatway-release/home, this is actually an
issue that I struggled with when
On 29 November 2013 10:21, Rahul Sharma rahul0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
(incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
mailing list and the community has approved the third release
candidate(RC2) for
Duplicated message.
I already responded to the other copy in the thread
On 2 December 2013 20:11, Kevin Minder kevin.min...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Sebb,
Thanks for your careful review. I'd like your continued insight into two
specific issues that you have raised.
WRT the NOTICE files
On 5 December 2013 10:37, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...3.6 Release consists of source code only,
Just discovered another important aspect of a release that is often overlooked.
The current source release artifacts must be released via the ASF
mirroring system.
Download pages must not point directly to the ASF servers; they must
use the mirror CGI scripts
Also old releases must not be left on
On 14 December 2013 03:13, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
(incubating) version 0.8.1.
The tag to be voted on is v0.8.1-incubating (commit b87d31d):
On 18 December 2013 22:49, Matthew Hayes mha...@linkedin.com wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to share our draft ASF incubation proposal for DataFu, a library
that makes it easier to solve data problems in Hadoop and high level
languages based on it.
I am the only person to think that the last
we came up with the name a couple years ago, it was inspired by kung
fu, in a playful way as Roman mentioned. Sort of like saying your Java Fu
or Python Fu is excellent.
-Matt
From: sebb [seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 3:57 PM
On 19 December 2013 18:26, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
But at the end, when a podling prepare a release there should not
include jar files as part of the source release artifacts to be VOTED
on, is this correct?
I think that depends on what the jar files are.
For example.
be
fine?
Again, that's ambiguous.
I would not expect to find jars of the project source in source releases.
Note that the Compress test jars were manually created on various
different systems.
- Henry
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:34 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2013 18:26, Henry
On 23 December 2013 05:50, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Greg Trasuk wrote:
Thanks everyone for the input. To summarize, it appears that the consensus
argument is:
- Jar files are not prohibited by policy in project repositories (svn),
although
On 23 December 2013 15:28, Kevin Minder kevin.min...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I was thinking that the real problem is that each new project is forced to
rediscover the right thing to do each time. From my POV there really aren't
that many licenses out there. If there were just a wiki that
On 24 December 2013 00:03, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, DeltaSpike got a ticket to clean up the old dist area in SVN
from when it was a podling. Since we have everything tagged in git,
it's not a big deal to recreate the release in case something goes
wrong,
On 2 January 2014 10:28, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
just a short message to let you know i moved the log4cxx tree to the
incubation tree and committed this auth:
This has caused a problem for the projects.apache.org site.
Please update the location of the DOAP.
Done
On 3 January 2014 11:54, Steve Loughran ste...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,,
I want to start a proposal for incubating my Hoya work. Can I have edit
permissions for SteveLoughran?
TIA,
steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Done
On 7 January 2014 15:15, Charles Simpson csimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Could I have wiki write access for CharlesSimpson to contribute to the Hoya
incubator proposal?
Thanks,
Charles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:27 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
my username is LarsHofhansl
It looks like sebb has whitelisted both you and Andrew. Thanks, sebb!
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
Jenny ?
On 13 January 2014 22:21, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Too many people will read that as Jena, the city in Thuringia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena
-1
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz
The voting status page shows recently closed votes.
All of these have status Resolved
What does this status actually mean?
Does it mean that the vote thread has been closed?
If so, then the column in the table seems redundant as it will never
show anything else.
It would help to know what was the latest commit in the backup.
Can then in theory check the commit e-mails to see what occurred
since, and recover any missing files from archive.a.o (presumably)
On 26 January 2014 23:17, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Unfortunately we had to
On 1 February 2014 02:04, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this
On 4 February 2014 20:26, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the list, I'm following up with these folks to get them accounts.
I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus
never added to the repo. A couple of questions:
-
101 - 200 of 1541 matches
Mail list logo
