Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Alan > On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the next 72

Re: [VOTE] Accept Geode into the Apache Incubator

+1 Regards, Alan Sent from my iPhone On Apr 19, 2015, at 10:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/Oxt I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode as a new incubator project. The proposal is available

Re: [VOTE} Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer

+1 Sent from my iPhone On Apr 18, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: OK all, discussion has died down, we have 3 mentors, I think it’s time to proceed to a VOTE. I am calling a VOTE now to accept the Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

+1 Sent from my iPhone On Mar 23, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! while trying to spread the good news that the Groovy vote has passed, I've realized that we don't have a dedicate Incubator Twitter account. Question for all: should we leverage @TheASF

Re: [POLL] Using this list to discuss pTLP proposals, ok?

I am very much in favor for provisional TLP's and direct-to-TLP's here at the Apache Software Foundation. With that said I am very much against the noise here on our incubator lists and wiki. We should really create a list in the wiki for this kind of endeavor. It really it should take place

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy into the Apache Incubator

+1 Sent from my iPad On Mar 18, 2015, at 11:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/KWE I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at:

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

On Jan 20, 2015, at 6:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: ...Isn’t it obvious what the above and IncubatorV2 proposal are about? Consolidating like minded individuals into a new IPMC and

Re: Incubator report sign-off

This statement confuses the lack of active mentors with the sheer size of the IPMC. The problem is not the size of the IPMC. The problem is that mentors are not doing their jobs Sent from my iPhone On Jan 5, 2015, at 3:41 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:

Re: Podlings should be in charge of their mentors (was: Incubator report sign-off)

A champion is merely a mentor who has publicly committed to being an active mentor, in some significant capacity, of a podling. The creation of such a role is symptomatic of a dysfunctional organization where responsibility and accountability has been diluted so much it's not at all clear

Re: Incubator report sign-off

as volunteers they are entitled to do) and the IPMC doesn't notice. Ross Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation -Original Message- From: Alan Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com] Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 4:50 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org

Re: Board reports - public or private

Board reports are always public, as are a project's/podling's discussions about what should go in their report. It's the mentors job to clear up any confusion there may be for a podling writing its first report. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 4, 2015, at 5:25 AM, John D. Ament

Re: Board reports - public or private

Imnsho, that is a poor practice. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 4, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I know many projects (TLP) which discuss/draft the report in private and only later make it public. LieGrue, strub On Sunday, 4 January 2015, 16:10, Alan

Re: Proposals - wiki required?

On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:40 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: I dont want to criminalize anybody, but on the other hand I would like to have 1 common place where to look for accepted proposals. Having the proposals, at least after acceptance, in one place should be beneficial to everyone, so

Re: Wiki Access

On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:30 AM, Nick Burch apa...@gagravarr.org wrote: On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Svante Schubert Can somebody please give me (user svanteschubert) access to the Wiki Anyone? Karma granted. (I guess everyone else was like me and

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tez from Apache Incubator to TLP

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Jun 30, 2014, at 9:16 PM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote: Hello folks Tez entered incubation in February, 2013. Since then, we have made progress towards graduation[1]. The Tez community recently voted positively towards graduation[2] with 27 +1s. Of

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.2 incubating (RC2)

Awesome! Thanks!! We need just one more vote! Regards, Alan On Jun 25, 2014, at 1:12 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, +1 binding I checked: - vote looks good - incubating in artefact name - signatures and hashes all good - DISCLAIMER good - NOTICE and LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.2-incubating

I'm looking at the release vote result and I'm seeing only one binding vote from a IPMC member. Am I comparing the vote results against the wrong IPMC roster? http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc Regards, Alan P.S. Apologies if this is a duplicate email. On Jun

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.2 incubating (RC2)

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:54 PM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote: Hello, This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.2 incubating. Apache MRQL is a query processing and optimization system for large-scale, distributed data analysis, built on top of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.2-incubating

There are some Thrift generated files that don't seem to have the AL prepended. I'm not sure if that's important since the files were automatically generated; imo, it's not. +1 binding Regards, Alan On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:37 AM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote: This is a call for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.2-incubating

one more IPMC member's vote. Regards, Alan On Jun 22, 2014, at 1:47 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote: Alan, That was the result of the PPMC vote on the dev@ list. Arvind is a mentor. -Taylor On Jun 22, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: I'm looking

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Celix as Top Level Project

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Jun 19, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Since entering Incubation in November 2010, the Celix podling been working towards graduation. The community has grown, releases have been made and new committers have been

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.2-incubating

On Jun 22, 2014, at 10:30 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: If I counted correctly, this release has one from the earlier vote plus mine. I think it needs one more IPMC member's vote. NM, I just read Marvin's email about the new release process that I was unaware

Re: [VOTE] Retire the S4 podling

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Jun 13, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote: Hi all, Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] about retiring the podling. That VOTE has passed with no -1s and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Optiq into the incubator

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On May 9, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: [ ] +1 Accept Optiq into the Incubator [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Stratosphere [ ] -1 Do not accept Optiq because ...

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On May 1, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote: Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top Level Project. The board resolution is included below. [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now. [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator [ ] +/-0

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Olingo from the Incubator

, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, The vote has passed with three binding +1 votes, no +0, and no -1 votes. +1 votes: * Dave Fisher * Alan Cabrera * Florian Müller I will ask the board to add the resolution to the agenda of the next board meeting. Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Olingo from the Incubator

All the binding votes made at Onlingo’s original graduation vote carry over to this one but I’ll still add my +1 - binding Regards, Alan On Mar 13, 2014, at 2:17 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, The Apache Olingo community has VOTEd to graduate from the incubator

Re: Tool to generate disclaimer, NOTICE, etc. files

...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 February 2014 16:49, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for licensing information and then generates a valid disclaimer, notice

Re: Tool to generate disclaimer, NOTICE, etc. files

: On Feb 8, 2014, at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 February 2014 16:49, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for licensing information

Re: Tool to generate disclaimer, NOTICE, etc. files

On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:47 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: WDYT? Non-trivial; maintaining the meta-data needed to accurately generate the NOTICE file is likely to require more effort than writing the NOTICE file

Re: Tool to generate disclaimer, NOTICE, etc. files

On Feb 10, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote: Hi Everyone, This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72

Re: Tool to generate disclaimer, NOTICE, etc. files

On Feb 11, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: One thing I think we could use is a tool which parses mbox archives in people.apache.org:/home/apmail/ and generates statistics: * Total

Tool to generate disclaimer, NOTICE, etc. files

Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for licensing information and then generates a valid disclaimer, notice, etc. files. If this is a good idea, what files should we generate? Currently,

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote: The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:http://s.apache.org/aEQ). I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE

Re: ApacheCon Denver CFP

There was a question on a podling as to whether developers on podlings could submit proposals about their project. Can they or can’t they? Regards, Alan On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: Hi everyone, ApacheCon Denver will take place April 7-9,

Re: [DISCUSS] jbatch impl @Apache?

Is there enough interest to generate an active community for this? Would it make more sense to do this work under Geronimo or TomEE? Regards, Alan On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi As you probably know JavaEE 7 proposes a new spec called

Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman

On Jul 30, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: ...Bertrand was skeptical about an ASF-wide ombud, but didn't raise any objection to an Incubator-specific position.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Olingo proposal as an incubating project

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:38 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Olingo into the Apache incubator. The proposal is pasted at the bottom on this email. The corresponding wiki page is:

Re: personal expectations for ombudsman role

On Jun 30, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: Now that things have settled down a bit, I'd like to talk about some of the things I'm looking for out of the ombudsman post. 1) proactively solicits opinions of exiting podlings about their experiences in the form

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Olingo next steps

On Jun 28, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote: Hi, About two weeks ago, Stephan presented the Apache Olingo (OData) proposal [1]. There has been a bit of a discussion about the name and the diversity of the initial committers. The name has been changed from OData to

Re: [VOTE] Release Curator 2.1.0-incubating

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Jordan Zimmerman randg...@apache.org wrote: Hello, This is a vote for the release of Apache Curator, version 2.1.0-incubating. This has been voted on via the d...@curator.incubator.apache.org mailing list and now requires a vote

Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman

I would prefer to use well known names for well known roles. Ombudsman is a roll that's been around for quite a while and the person filling that role for the ASF will be doing roughly the same thing as ombudsman in other organizations. With that said, I will agree that if everything is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman

On Jun 17, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: A paradox: The VP is not supposed to exercise authority in normal circumstances. Projects are supposed to have mentors that advocate for them. If a project comes 'to the ombudsman', whether that's the VP or not,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman

On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: This is a suggestion that has come up in the past, and the typical counter-argument is that this is something the chair needs to provide themselves. Sent from my iPhone The usual reason for an ombudsman is to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman

should limit themselves to the incubator? 15.06.2013 19:53 пользователь Alan Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com написал: Problem: podlings are confused on where to go when there's a problem. Cause: we seem to collect/handle/organize problems in an ad hoc manner and sometimes mentors

Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman

recently discussed in relation to the recent chair vote. - Original Message - From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 1:36 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:52 AM

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Jun 14, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1]. I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter the incubator as a standard podling under the

Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?

On Jun 15, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: I think there's merit in the idea of multiple, smaller incubators, so long as it is set up in a way that doesn't involve prospective podlings playing the incubators against each other. Can you provide detail on what you mean by

Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?

On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote: I.e. while the IPMC or ComDev or whoever would still set policy and provide community best practice guidance. But then separate mailing lists/groups would provide actual oversight of podlings (incoming, mentoring,

Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?

On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: What we really need for podlings is a bill of rights towards what they can expect of their mentors, because too few of them actually are willing to question the participation of the people who signed up to mentor them

Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?

of disempowerment we too often dish out. From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 11:29 AM Subject: Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology? On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Joe

[PROPOSAL] Mandatory podling exit interviews

Problem: we seem to have unclear and conflicting ideas as to what the areas of improvement are for the Incubator. Cause: we have no concrete, anonymized, information on what the podlings' experiences were during incubation. Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept Stratos as an Apache Incubation Project

On Jun 13, 2013, at 1:10 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: On 13 June 2013 04:56, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: So here's a thought... ... I would therefore like to propose

Re: Change of Chair

On Jun 13, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Incubator community, I have tendered my resignation as VP, Incubator. The PMC has recommend Marvin Humphrey as my successor in a motion submitted to the Foundation board for consideration at the meeting next week.

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept Stratos as an Apache Incubation Project

On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: So here's a thought... There have been many discussions about different ways to incubate projects. One of the most radical ideas is to dismantle the incubator and replace the podling concept with probationary TLPs

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (398J) paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: All, I'd like to call a VOTE for the acceptance of Apache HotdoG into the Incubator. I'll leave the VOTE open for the rest of the week and close it out Monday, June 17th

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Mesos

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi All, The Apache Mesos community is ready to graduate. They have added committers and PPMC members while in the Incubator; have made a few releases; are discussing their

Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark for the Incubator

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Folks, OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week. So far I've heard +1s from the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache MetaModel into the Apache incubator

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Jun 6, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of MetaModel into the Apache incubator. The vote will close on June 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM (PST). [] +1 Accept MetaModel into the Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

Mentors come and go. Is there an explicit rule that a podling needs three mentors before it can start to be incubated? Regards, Alan On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Paul, guys; I just noticed that HotdoG only has 2 mentors right now

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

rule (to my knowledge). The number 3 came about because that's how many votes are needed for a release. With 3 mentors on the project it means the project needs to come to the IPMC for additional votes. As we've seen this can become very messy. Ross On 5 June 2013 15:48, Alan Cabrera l

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++ -Original Message- From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com Reply-To: general

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Greg Reddin gred...@gmail.com wrote: Added my name to the proposal. I'm willing to mentor. Benson, One of my podling tools doesn't see that Greg is on the IPMC though he is an ASF member. I think we need to update the LDAP entries if he's already been ACK'd.

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Greg Reddin gred...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Greg Reddin gred...@gmail.com wrote: Added my name to the proposal. I'm willing to mentor. Benson, One of my

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

on mino and got back: No LDAP groups found with cn=incubator-pmc! So either I'm doing that wrong or don't have the karma. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org Date

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain in the files that you copied into our repos. It is impossible to tell what is from

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: This when in doubt leave it out approach has gone a long way at smoothing podling release

Re: svn commit: r1489076 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: src/asf/incubator/podlings.py tests/test_podlings.py

On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:47 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 June 2013 18:43, a...@apache.org wrote: Author: adc Date: Mon Jun 3 17:43:51 2013 New Revision: 1489076 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1489076 Log: Minor sketch of some podling code before I forget to check it in. And

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 4, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain in the files

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 June 2013 05:10, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: ... Apache Incubator tools Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation This product includes

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Modified: incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt?rev=1488735r1=1488734r2=1488735view=diff

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Modified: incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 2, 2013, at 7:45 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 2, 2013, at 10:09 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jun 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jun 2, 2013, at 4

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 2, 2013, at 8:51 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 2, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Apache Incubator tools Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, RC2

How many binding votes are there from the PPMC vote? Regards, Alan On May 31, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Andrew Bayer aba...@apache.org wrote: Hello, This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, the first jclouds release at Apache. The PPMC has approved the release

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked dormant and nearly 30 marked retired. The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process and

Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel for the Apache Incubator

On May 29, 2013, at 12:33 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: From the subject line I thought this was going to be another attempt to sort out the incubator :-/ LOL, so did I! Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Podling not Poddling

Do it! Thanks! Regards, Alan On May 30, 2013, at 8:32 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I keep seeing the word Poddling being used in mail and now the Wiki [1]; however I thought the original and correct name was Podling? I think we should stick to Podling for all the documentation.

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

On May 30, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked dormant and nearly 30 marked retired. The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

on GitHub or not. Not enough for me to maintain two terms. Just my 2 cents.. On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Yeah, I like the word dormant as well. Should we

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-126) Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name

Alan Cabrera created INCUBATOR-126: -- Summary: Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name Key: INCUBATOR-126 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126 Project: Incubator

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-126) Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13667806#comment-13667806 ] Alan Cabrera commented on INCUBATOR-126: That's a good idea. I think we should

What's the difference between dormant and retired?

Looking at the podlings.xml and it's not clear to me what the difference is. I'm sure I neglected to read some documentation bit. Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

is closed down, I think it has to be retired. Dormant implies a PPMC is taking some time off. Basically this is a larger version of don't be afraid to delete a line of code; it's in version control. Hen On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Alan Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

feasible for the podlings to go, well, dormant. Upayavira On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 05:39 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: They kinda sound the same. Why didn't podlings want to retire? Does anyone know? Regards, Alan On May 27, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote

Re: The Only Thing Wrong - Execution of Process

I think there's some good ideas here. You should capture them in http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013 Regards, Alan On May 15, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi - I've been incredibly busy, but to me the main thing wrong in the Incubator is

Re: Writing some tooling

On May 10, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Alan Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote: I'm currently writing some tooling to help with the incubation process as well as mail list moderator tools. The first thing that I'm writing is a command that will print out who is the owner of an email alias

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Joe Brockmeier joins the Incubator PMC

Welcome aboard! Regards, Alan On May 13, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Dear community, I am pleased to announce that Joe Brockmeier joins the Incubator PMC. Please join me in extending a warm welcome to Joe! On behalf of the Incubator PMC, -- NS

Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)

Don't let me stop the vote but I'm getting java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space when I run the tests, mvn clean install. My MAVEN_OPTS is: -Xms2G -Xmx2G -XX:PermSize=1G -XX:MaxPermSize=1G Am I doing something wrong? Regards, Alan On May 7, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Curator 2.0.0-incubating released

Sebb you are awesome and correct. But I have to say, I think that when we make suggestions to podlings, we should make it clear that we are making suggestions and are not pointing out some ASF Incubator transgression. This is one such cases where Sebb us making a very useful suggestion.

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

On May 11, 2013, at 7:26 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: I also agree that there isn't consensus in the Incubator PMC to do this, but I'm not sure we need it. Lovely. Regards, Alan

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

On May 11, 2013, at 5:40 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: A real experiment with 'probationary projects' would have to model the entire process of a new project launching with _no IPMC_ to participate in any way. Can you explain what problem launching new projects with _no

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

On May 11, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Violating my 24 hour rule just this one, and worse yet to repeat myself: IMO, I think this is fine so long as it occurs on the weekend. :) +1 Joe, Ross, etc. I rather regret mentioning the direct launch

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

On May 11, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: Frankly I find the notion that the board will do a better job of MENTORING these projects than the IPMC to be batshit insane, but that's just me. We need manpower, and there is plenty of that available amongst the

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

On May 11, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: It's often called a dead-man's switch. I think the term applied originally to locomotive engineers and also metro car drivers. (I'm not sure what a dead pilot switch could accomplish in an aircraft.) I

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

On May 10, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: So, here we have: Alan's idea of removing champions and shepherds and demanding mentor recommitment, with the 'teeth' of putting podlings on ice if they can't muster an adequate mentor squad. My idea of asking

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

Lean startup approaches make sense when you do not know the problem that you're solving. You perform experiments and pivot as you blindly search for a domain whose problems you can solve and make money doing it. Here, we know what our problems are. This is not to say that we should not

Re: May 2013 Report

I think that you should make it clear that the Marvin machinery broke down and projects did not get their notifications. Regards, Alan On May 10, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I wrote some text at the front. I plan to fill in things like PMC members coming

  1   2   >