Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.0.0 [RC0]

2020-12-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) but a lot more needs to be done on the LICENSE and headers I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - a good start have been made on LICENSE - NOTICE looks fine - No unexpected binary files - More work needs to be done on adding ASF headers I not sure that using key

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Suitable Name Search Documentation

2020-12-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I think the issue may be more clarifying and simplifying the original policy language. Perhaps that can be done at the some time? Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: svn commit: r1883912 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/shepherd_assignments.json

2020-11-28 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Superset and TVM graduated and that’s not reflected in your report > preparation. Sorry I has assumed that the new projects had taken care of that. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[MENTORS] Report timeline

2020-11-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The time line is as follows: Wed December 02 Podling reports due by end of day Sun December 06 Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun December 06 Summary due by end of day Tue December 08 Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed December 09 Report submitted to Board Wed December 16 Board

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Weex (Incubating) 0.29.0-RC1

2020-11-28 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, I also see only 1 +1 vote in the thread in your dev list normally you need 3 +1 votes from PPMC members before bring it t the IPMC to vote on. I suggest you ask your mentors and other PPMC to vote on the dev list and cancel this vote here on the incubator list. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts as TLP (round 2)

2020-11-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The description of [1] is generated from GitHub release, so it will be > updated with our next release, which is expected to happen in a few more days. Good to hear. > The description of [2] is generated from GitHub description. We can update > the GitHub description, adding "Apache

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache DataSketches Project to TLP

2020-11-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) All the best! Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release the Apache Pegasus 2.1.0

2020-11-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) but it would be good to see progress on adding all license information / fixing all headers I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER (WIP) exists - LICENSE is missing some licenses - NOTICE seems OK - Unclear if all ASF source files have ASF headers. It would be best to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 5.0.0 (release candidate 3)

2020-11-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - signatures and hashes are fine - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - All source files have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe,

Re: Where to get feedback on a project before formulating a proposal

2020-11-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The idea was first brought up over a year ago by a member of the community, > although it's been me dragging my feet. They are actually an ASF member. Being an ASF member that can be a mentor or the champion. Have you asked them if they would be willing to do that? Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts as TLP (round 2)

2020-11-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +0 I think a little more attention needs to given to branding and trademarks e.g. [1][2][3][4] The last ones in particular are concerning as they come from Baidu and there seem to be others as well [8] Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.npmjs.com/package/echarts 2.

Re: Missing graduation resolutions

2020-11-11 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The Superset graduation resolution was already submitted to the board. In > fact it made the agenda at the last board meeting but was tabled to give > the board more time for due diligence. Let me know if it needs to be > resubmitted or anything. I’ve resubmitted it so it should be fine

Re: Missing reports from Incubator report

2020-11-11 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > There's been some confusion over annotator's reporting schedule. > It seems several team members had a (presumably mistaken?) > recollection of having reported in October. It did report in October, but didn’t get sign off from any of the mentors. Thanks, Justin

Missing reports from Incubator report

2020-11-11 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I’ve just submitted the board report [1] and we were missing the follow reports: - Annotator - BlueMarlin - Livy - S2Graph - Toree - Warble Thanks, Justin 1. https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2020-11-18/Incubator

Missing graduation resolutions

2020-11-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Several projects have discussed graduation but I’m not seeing any proposals submitted. [1] It best to get them in early so board members can review them in time. I think we should have proposals for: - TVM - Superset - Flagon - ECharts? I’ve added Superset. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [MENTORS] Incubator report timeline for November 2020

2020-10-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > How can I edit the following page? I am the owner of Blue Marlin project and > would like to submit my report. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/November2020 > he permissions for your PPMC had

Re: Proposed Resolution: Establish Apache Flagon TLP

2020-10-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Everything looks fine to me. Only thing I see is that two proposed of the PMC members are not signed up to the private list: * Laura Mariano * Steve York And i would be nice to have you logo here [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://apache.org/logos/?#flagon

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.67.0 (incubating) release

2020-10-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) This is an easy release to check I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - LICENS and NOTICE are fine - no binary files - all source files have ASF headers It not immediately clear have you can compile from the instructions included within the release

[MENTORS] Incubator report timeline for November 2020

2020-10-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Here’s the reporting timeline. Report as usual can be entered on the Wiki [1] Wed November 4th Podling reports due by end of day Sun November 8th Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun November 8th Summary due by end of day Tue November 10th Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed November

Re: [VOTE] Release the Apache Pegasus 2.1.0

2020-10-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) Both the issues of the missing header and licensing is mentioned in the DISCLAIMER so I think that’s OK, but progress will need to be made on these in the next release. I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER_WIP exists and contains what

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-22 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Thanks, Justin. After removing stale issues and adding the statement on GPU > license, assuming we address any other license issue in the next rc, should > we name it as simply DISCLAIMER instead of DISCLAIMER-WIP? When all issue have been resolved then I would name it DISCLAIMER,

Podling termination by the IPMC

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, As requested by Dave. IMO This is going to happen infrequently and possibly never. I can only think of a couple of occasions when this has been discussed in the last five years. Things generally work out one way or another before this step needs to be taken. The current IPMC policy[1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Let’s discuss outside the immediate context of MxNet reasons for the IPMC to > suspend a podling. Sure, it would be best to start a seperate thread for that. I think however it would be so infrequent and each situation different that it would be hard to come up with some that would work

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > If NVIDIA changes the license then it must be very soon. If so then the issue > is gone. And the issue may not be gone unless the license change is retroactive. Currently the project has maven artefacts in the Apache repo that contain category X code. [1] Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Don’t make a noncompliant binary release. The project is (sadly) already doing this [1], they are hoping the licensing issue can be sorted, but its taken more than 5 months and little visible progress on that seems to have been done. NVIDIA is considering changing, but to what we don’t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, Is there anything from the known issues in [1] that needs to be added? Justin 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Re the licensed files missing from LICENSE here are some examples[1][2][3][4], but I haven’t done a full check so there are probably more. Thanks, Justin 1. ./3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt/third_party/onnx/third_party/pybind11/tests/test_gil_scoped.cpp 2.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Thanks for the vote. It looks like we forgot to remove the mentions of the > resolved issues in the DISCLAIMER-WIP. Checking the linked issues, all of > them have been resolved in 1.8. Is this still a blocking issue if the actual > issues that the DISCLAIMER-WIP links to are addressed?

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a Top Level Project

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The resolution was put on the board agenda, but given it was received less than 24 hours before the board meeting it was decided to postpone it till next month, to give board members time to properly consider the proposal. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 (binding) Please see [1] and note which sort of issues need to be fixed before making a new release. While it does include the WIP declaimers, it includes several knows issues that have been outstanding for several releases. It also fails to mention teh issue with Nvidia licensing and

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a Top Level Project

2020-10-20 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, +1 (binding) Thanks for addressing everything I brought up here and on your private list. There's still a little more to do, but it’s being dealt with, so I’m all good with you graduating. Do keep an eye on how you are handling those synchronous meetings and try to make sure everyone can

Re: Is there a check list for podling renames?

2020-10-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I could not find one; seems to me it would be useful to document > everything that has to be done by the podling and what is done by > Infra. There is not one that I know of. Hopefully they are rare, as they cause a bit of work for Infra. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

2020-10-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I’ve stuck to the basic directions in [2] of sending a “friendly” email (AND > Slack message, in our case), in private, to the community member. That is certainly the best first step with dealing with something like this. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

2020-10-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I hope that everyone is now subscribed after the last round of nagging, but I > still have no way to confirm who’s not on the list. Daniel Gaspar is still not subscribed, but all others have, I don’t see that as a blocker to graduation. > After taking this up with our mentors, we’ve

Re: Some instructions are misleading on mentor page

2020-10-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I agree this could be clearer: "Mentors MUST be on the IPMC. This should be checked prior to beginning incubation. Any prospective Mentors who are not yet on the IPMC should ask to be added (by election). Email the application to priv...@incubator.apache.org.” How about this: "Mentors

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

2020-10-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > (1) PPMC members not subscribed to the private list. > > I have no way to see who is or isn’t on the list Whimsey should show that to PMC member with a * next to their name. Currnly still not subscribed are: Aaron Suddjian Bogdan Kyryliuk Chris Williams Daniel Gaspar Serena Jiang There

Re: BlueMarlin Slow Bootstrap into Incubator

2020-10-08 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > It is out of date and COMPLETELY misses DNS requests! I believe it’s up to date, but as always PRs welcome. It's mentioned under Resources: "The first resources to be created are LDAP and DNS. These should be requested via Apache Infra JIRA → New Podling Parent Request” The podlings.xml

Re: BlueMarlin Slow Bootstrap into Incubator

2020-10-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, As I said it’s looks to be a DNS issue, bluemarlin.incubator.apache.org resolves but bluemarlin.apache.org doesn’t. So depending on which domain you use it you get different results. This hasn’t been fixed yet.

Re: BlueMarlin Slow Bootstrap into Incubator

2020-10-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > This project needs to have the incubator/their mentors guide them through the > podling creation process. They need to submit a dns creation infra ticket and > perform other needed actions to establish the podling. The mailing list have been created and I’ve been able to send email to

[MENTORS] Sign off podling reports due Tuesday 13th

2020-10-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Report sign offs are due on Tuesday 13th and all reports should be submitted by now. We are still missing: Livy Pegasus S2Graph SDAP Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

2020-10-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Thanks for your answers. Re the logo URL I though that redirected but doesn’t they https://apache.org/logos/ The points were (and were repeated for 4 reports): 1. Grow the Flagon Committer/Contributor/Community Base 2. Refine release processes for core analytic product (Distill) 3.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

2020-10-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Only UserALE.js has been released under SensSoft (Incubating) and Flagon > (Incubating) names. No other products have been released so this is a > non-topic in my opinion. So assuming 2 of the products are no longer maintained but it looks like the other 2 without releases are. Are

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

2020-10-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I have absolutely no idea what this is. It is not referenced from the > Incubator Website navigation. Can you please provide a link? See [1]. However it is not required to be filled in for a project to graduate. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

2020-10-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, These change all look fine. So it seem the only outstanding things (unless any IPMC member brings up something else) are: - PPMC member not subscribe to the private list - How to deal with the synchronous meetings - Links to other companies on your front page. Have one of your mentors (or

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

2020-10-07 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > I don’t care which products you have as long as the most recent for each is a > proper Apache release. I could be mistaken (given the name change) but there only seems to be only Apache releases for UserALE.js, although two of the products may be no longer used and have been dropped.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

2020-10-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I didi my usual check and most things look good, but I can see a couple of minor things. Hopefully the mentors can comment on the following: - Logo is missing form logos.apache.org - A few of the proposed PMC are not subscribed to the private list (Alex, Laura, Steve) - It’s been a long

Re: New distribution guidelines

2020-10-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Thanks for the feedback. > There's some spurious text at the start of the page. I’ll remove this. > Also, what does the acronym IP mean? IP = Intellectual property > - "Releases must be placed in the Apache mirror system." > Which releases are being referred to here? Source and binaries,

New distribution guidelines

2020-10-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi PPMC members, New distribution guidelines, that we have been working on for some time, have been published here: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html They contain information on distributing releases on 3rd party platforms including Maven, GitHub, Docker, NPM and PiPy.

[VOTE][RESULT] Distribution guidelines for platforms

2020-10-04 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, So this passes with 6 +1 vest and one -0 vote. Thanks to everyone who taken part in this conversation and others over the last couple of years to make this happen. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

2020-10-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I’m not too surprised to hear that one or more people haven’t sent emails to > the list… most of the engagement happens on the GitHub repo and on Slack. > With help from our mentor, I’ve already reached out to folks who were > erroneously not on the private list (for varied reasons), and

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

2020-10-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Thanks for bringing up your concern here. The synchronous meeting you > describe does have an agenda with meeting minutes/notes [1], which are open > to the public, and was previously shared on the dev list [2] I note those in attendance are listed by company affiliation, contributors

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

2020-10-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I know at one point this project was have bi-weekly synchronous meetings. Is this still happened? My concern is that I don’t see any information of what happens at these meetings being brought back to the mailing list. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

2020-10-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, With your proposed PMC list I can see a number of the people mentioned don’t seem to be active and a number are not signed up to the project private mailing list. A quick check found at least one who looks to have not sent a single email to the mailing list during the entire incubation

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

2020-10-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I think there's a couple of minor thing that need some minor fixes/clarification. I was looking at your website and can’t see where I can download the released versions form the Apache mirrors [1]. (This relates to CD10 in the maturity model and the distribution part.) I assume the

Re: Logo

2020-10-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Your might want to ask apache central services you help you with a logo. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

2020-09-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi Dave, Much appreciated. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

2020-09-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi Dave, Just wondered if you have reconsider you -1 vote after the discussion here and elsewhere? What more would you required in order to vote +1 on this? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[Mentors] Timeline for Octobers Report due Wednesday October 7th

2020-09-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The report can be found here [1] Timeline for October report: Wed October 7th Podling reports due by end of day Sun October 11thShepherd reviews due by end of day Sun October 11thSummary due by end of day Tue October 13thMentor signoff due by end of day Wed October

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache IoTDB as TLP

2020-09-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The project has become a TLP so there no need to vote any more :-) Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-31 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Thanks Justin. As mentioned in the last email. We are following the > previous naming convention of similar conferences like "Kafka Summit" and > "Spark + AI Summit”. I believe are slightly different sort of events as they are not run by the project but by another 3rd party / commercial

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-31 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The TVM PPMC would certainly be more than happy to follow trademarks > suggestions on event brandings and make sure the event is compliant. > To follow up the naming compliance. Notably, in the main page the project > name "Apache (incubating) TVM" is used in the first and most prominent >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-31 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The conference hasn’t yet been approved by trademarks, but a request to use that domain has been asked [1]. I don’t think this is an issue unless trademarks says otherwise. My guess is that they may want a little more information to see if it complies with event branding policy [2]. It btw

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Sorry my mistake, I meant to say tvm.ai not tvm.io, but as I said subdomains on tvm.ai are not redirecting. For instance discuss.tvm.ai stays as it is. Other sub-domains include ci.tvm.ai , tracking.tvm.ai and docs.tvm.ai that I’ve found. There might be others, of those four, only docs

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Thanks for the response. I think the docker issue is resolved. I still have concerns about use of tvm.io. I have discovered several other subdomains (six in total) that do not redirect to the Apache site, there might be others. It's still unclear who has control of this domain name. The

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The "install from source” page should probably point people to the source releases rather than the latest code in GitHub. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I am sure there are many other binary packaging out there that use Apache > project names, for example this one for Apache Spark: > https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/spark/ What other Apache projects do (Spark in particular for various reasons) are not always good examples to follow. But

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, On that installation pages it does says "We provide docker utility scripts to help developers to setup development environment. They are also helpful run through TVM demo and tutorials.” and "You can find some un-official prebuilt images in https://hub.docker.com/r/tvmai/.” IMO this

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Then why do they have 40K+ downloads? It also doesn’t explain the version > numbers. Sorry 4K I misread that, but even that seem high for something that is used for testing. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > - As you can see that the domain redirects to https://tvm.apache.org/. > So hopefully there is no confusion here. In some cases it does not. e.g. discuss.tvm.ai IMO this is a graduation blocker. > P2: releases > - The PPMC has a well documented release process[1] > that anyone can go

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I’m also concerned that the person who seems responsible for these docker images seems to be the proposed chair of the project. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I also have several concerns. 1. Use of the tvm.ai domain - has permission been obtained from trademark to use this domain? Who has control of it? 2. With only 2 releases with 1 release manager I don’t think the project is mature enough to graduate, 3. Branding/trademarks on these

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

2020-08-28 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, I’m -1 (binding), please see the discussion thread for my concerns. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[MENTORS] Podling reports due 2nd September

2020-08-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Reporting timeline for September is as follows .The reports can be entered here [1] Wed September 02 - Podling reports due by end of day Sun September 06 - Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun September 06 - Summary due by end of day Tue September 08 - Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed

Re: Giving our PMs and contributors triage rights on GitHub

2020-08-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Last thought: I don't have data on this, but I think the ASF could be doing > better at diversity (see the ApacheCon picture > as anecdotal evidence). Being inclusive of a wider range of roles and > offering diverse paths to "committerhood" could really help

Re: Giving our PMs and contributors triage rights on GitHub

2020-08-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, If you trust someone access that allows issue and pull request admin, why would you not trust them with commit access to the codebase? Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.10.1

2020-08-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I checked many projects on [1], few projects put the readme file > separated with the source-release file. It not a requirement but many project do it so they can link to it from their download page. People often want to look at the README before downloading and installing the software.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts (incubating) as a top level project

2020-08-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, From a quick search there also seem to be a few branding issues to sort out. For instance this page which I think you recently wrote? [1] There's not a single mention there that it’s an Apache project, although it does link to echarts.apache.org. It would be nice if this page [2] was

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts (incubating) as a top level project

2020-08-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > But unfortunately we missed the theme builder page. > All other pages (like https://echarts.baidu.com/option.html ) have been > fixed. > We will solve the theme builder page soon and double check other pages. IMO the domain echarts.baidu.com probably should not exist as it implies

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts (incubating) as a top level project

2020-08-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Has the issue with the multiple domain names been resolved? e.g https://echarts.baidu.com/theme-builder/en/index.html Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > After the project was open sourced, we did not conduct evangelism, and the > internal version iterations were not synchronized in time. Does that mean a different version to what in that GitHub will be donated to ASF? That may complicate things a little as we would need to know who the

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The incubator prefers that a project comes with a community around it but it’s not essential. Not having one may possibly make graduation harder, as long as the project is aware of that I don’t see any issues. Thanks, Justin

[jira] [Comment Edited] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

2020-08-08 Thread Justin Mclean (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17173644#comment-17173644 ] Justin Mclean edited comment on INCUBATOR-253 at 8/8/20, 12:34 PM

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

2020-08-08 Thread Justin Mclean (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17173644#comment-17173644 ] Justin Mclean commented on INCUBATOR-253: - That information doesn't belong

Re: Broken links on https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html

2020-08-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > We noticed that many links seem broken on the graduation documentation and > thought we'd bring this to your attention. Specifically, most of the links > under the "Graduation Check List” section Thanks for that. Most of these link are just links to other sections on the same page,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

2020-08-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - disclaimer exists - license and notice good - no unexpected binary files - files have ASF headers Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [MENTORS] Podling reports due today

2020-08-06 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Looks like Doris will reimport next moth. Report next month even :-) Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [MENTORS] Podling reports due today

2020-08-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Looks like Doris will reimport next moth. What do you think we should do about Warble? Either your an incubating project with PPMC oversight or not, there isn’t really a consent of a dormant project. Still missing and unless they are submitted ASAP they will be expected to report next

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

2020-08-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > 1. Change all MXNet to Apache MXNet (incubating) from documentation where > it necessary > 2. Change maven package description ” MXNet Engine Adapter for DJL” to > "Deep Java Library (DJL) Engine Adapter for Apache MXNet" for clarification Thanks for doing that. ASF generally

[MENTORS] Podling reports due today

2020-08-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Podling report are due today and currently we’re waiting on the following projects. Annotator BlueMarlin Doris Liminal Livy NLPCraft Pinot S2Graph SDAP Sedona Training Tuweni Warble Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Problems with Committer Invite Documentation

2020-08-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I searched incubator.a.o and could not find any comparable documentation > that is step-by-step with example template emails. See: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#adding_new_committers (Which points to other ASF documentation) > Because it has been over 24 hours since our

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

2020-08-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > We have paid attention to this issue, the berkeleydb-je as of version 7.3, JE > is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license: > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17277_02/html/relnotes.html > Good to know. Sadly with some 3rd party software

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

2020-08-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > berkeleydb-je is a component that TubeMQ relies on to store metadata, it > needs to be downloaded from oracle and requires username and password > access. > For the convenience of everyone, we found this third-party repository ( > https://download.dcache

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbo Getty project contribution

2020-08-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I don’t agree. If Alex owns the copyright to the whole of the dubbogo > contribution then his assurance through his ICLA ought to be enough for the > ASF. IMO (legal hat on) Alex doesn’t own the copyright, each individual contributor does to the bits they contributed. Thanks, Justin

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbo Getty project contribution

2020-08-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Do we need to add all the committers in the IP clearance list of this page? Yes it would be good to list them all. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

2020-08-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) However if it wasn’t for the Incubating WIP disclaimer I would be -1. The LICENSE issues where brought up last time [1] It is best if some work is done to improve each release so it better than the last. Please ask your mentors to help with this. I checked: - incubating in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

2020-07-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Again, we are NOT releasing release candidates. No but companies that your PPMC members are employed by are. Those PPMC members are in a good position to make sure their employers are aware of and follow ASF policies where needed. It's part of a (P)PMC duties to make sure branding,

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbo Getty project contribution

2020-07-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I see there’s more than one committer, but the IP clearance only list one person. Do we have ICLAs for all committers? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.8-rc01

2020-07-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, incubator-brpc-0.9.8-rc01.tar.gz needs to be renamed as well. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] New builds server and who should access

2020-07-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Do we want to have podlings request their own separate folders to ease > transitions and help with graduation and retirement? My answer is yes. +1 to that as its less work for project, infra and the incubator. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

2020-07-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > It seems that most of the concerns are branding/trademark/legal issues from > those third-party projects which relies on MXNet and the AWS marketplace (or > MXNet's downstream projects), which could be tracked separately and improved > continually to 100% meet the requirement of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >