Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache NuttX to TLP

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 8:20 AM Trista Pan wrote: > Looks like one step late for its voting. Anyway, very impressed with its > incubator proposal and discussion. > In this graduation season, my best wishes for NuttX project’s graduation! > ;-) Thank you! Cheers, Nathan

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache NuttX to TLP

Hi all, The IPMC vote for graduation of Apache NuttX (Incubating) has passed [1]. There are: * 15 +1 votes (6 binding, 9 non-binding) * No 0 votes * No -1 votes Binding +1 (6) * Duo Zhang * Junping Du * Willem Jiang * Jerry Tan * Calvin Kirs * Nathan Hartman Non-binding +1 (9) * Brennan Ashton

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache NuttX to TLP

As the vote has been open for 7 days, I will now go ahead and close this out with my own vote: +1 (binding) Thanks to everyone who participated! I will post the vote results shortly... Cheers, Nathan Hartman On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 12:06 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > Dear Apache Inc

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache NuttX to TLP

On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 5:52 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > For the trademark to be transferred you need to contact tradema...@apache.org > and they will handle the process and costs. > > Kind Regards, > Justin Thanks. We are in communication with trademarks@

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache NuttX to TLP

On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 3:45 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > it may be best to let the IPMC to discuss this before holding a vote > (although I don’t see any issues). > > Kind Regards, > Justin Hi Justin, To be clear, would you like us to cancel the vote and have a [DISCUSS] thread?

[VOTE] Graduate Apache NuttX to TLP

* Justin Mclean * Lup Yuen Lee * Masayuki Ishikawa * Mohammad Asif Siddiqui * Nathan Hartman * Sara Monteiro * Xiang Xiao NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Alin Jerpelea be appointed to the office of Vice Pre

Re: NuttX community graduation vote started

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 8:53 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > A community graduation VOTE at Apache NuttX (Incubating) is now taking > place [1] regarding graduation to Top-Level Project (TLP). > > I'd like to take this opportunity to ex

NuttX community graduation vote started

members, for helping us get this far. THANK YOU! [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/r1tn6qstkqmhh52szy4j2bgnnydbjmx4 Cheers, Nathan Hartman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: Available to help with projects

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:35 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > I don’t mean to dampen anyone's enthusiasm, but NuttX probably doesn’t > need a lot of help to graduate, but there are other podlings that do need > more help. > > Kind Regards, > Justin On the contrary, I think that should

Re: Available to help with projects

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:20 PM Venkat Ranganathan wrote: > Thanks Nathan > > I am available. > > Thanks > > Venkat Thanks Venkat! How do we proceed? Maybe you could post to the NuttX list? dev@ nuttx.a.o... Tomorrow on that list I'm going to call the vote to graduate... Cheers Nathan

Re: Available to help with projects

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 8:03 PM Venkat wrote: > Hi Incubator community > > This is Venkat Ranganathan, ASF member and IPMC member. I have some > time available now to contribute to incubator projects for mentor-ship > and development work after being away due to work related pressures. > > Let

Re: [MENTORS] Projects > 1000 days in Incubation

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 2:06 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > We have several projects that seem to have been hanging about in the > Incubator a little longer than they should. I took a look at all projects > that have been incubating for more than a 1000 days, and this seems to be > the state

Re: [ROLE CALL] Roll Calls for projects missing reports

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 8:50 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi, > > Marvin-AI and Milagro have both had tutors miss sign-off, > and other podlings have actually had this happen. > What can we do to help avoid this situation? At certain times of the > year, mentors may not really have the time.

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove 72 hour waiting time to add PPMC members.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 6:45 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > The board recently changed the 72-hour waiting time to add a PMC member to a > top level project. We have the same 72-hour waiting time to add PPMC members > to a podling. > > Do we want to consider removing this 72-hour waiting time and

Re: [RESULTS] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 11.0.0 RC2

gt; > Binding: > > +1 Nathan Hartman > +1 Duo Zhang > +1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > Non-Binding > +1 TimH > > Vote thread > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0h6wq2cqk3ckdttz78964fw4007b51lr > > We will proceed with the official release of 11.0.0 > Thank you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 11.0.0

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:57 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 11.0.0. > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 11.0.0. > > We now kindly

Re: [MENTORS] Late podling reports and missing signoffs

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:15 AM Calvin Kirs wrote: > We are missing reports from: > - EventMesh > - HugeGraph > - MarvinAI > - Nuttx > - Spot > - Teaclave > - PonyMail The NuttX report is posted. Cheers, Nathan - To

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 11.0.0

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:57 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 11.0.0. (snip) > Apache NuttX community vote and result thread: > Result:https://lists.apache.org/thread/c0lv34jvwbdh6wfnl7xsprxmggllpmcw >

Re: [Discuss] Baremaps Proposal

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 9:25 AM Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > Here is a proposal for Baremaps, a toolkit and a set of infrastructure > components for creating, publishing, and operating online maps. The proposal > is published on the wiki [1] and a demonstration of our base map

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC4]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:10 AM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 10.3.0. > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.3.0. > > We now kindly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC2]

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 2:57 AM alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 10.3.0. > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.3.0. > > We now

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC2]

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 2:57 AM alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 10.3.0. > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.3.0. > > We now

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC0]

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:39 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > > Ah, then let me just post them as the content. I've removed several files > from the list by the information you provided. And I suggested that when > you specify a library, better also provide the place where the related > files are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC0]

On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 8:57 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > > Yes, most of them are Kconfig, defconfig and .ld files. I think all of them > are generated files so do not need a license header. > > We could introduce a rat.exclude file in our repo to exclude these > generated files. > > And thanks for

Re: Could Apache Host the Yahoo Cloud Serving Benchmark (YCSB)

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 4:04 AM Jörg Domaschka wrote: > Dear Apache Incubator PMC members, > > the Yahoo Cloud Serving Benchmark (YCSB) is a benchmarking framework > originally developed for comparing NoSQL DBMS, but by now used for all > kinds of DBMS. It is well-established in industry and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.2.0

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 6:05 AM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 10.2.0. > > > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.2.0. > > We now

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.2.0

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:21 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > > Is it only for me? I can not open the mail-archives url, it just gives > me a xml... No, it is not only you. I am seeing XML there also. > So this is the vote thread > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/53w00fm66prp28yrg4rkq8rj1cp3v87y >

Re: Champion and Mentors wanted for new potential Apache SST incubator project

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:39 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi Lothar, > > after a call with you and comparing that to the proposal, I think it > would be great if you could explain a little bit more on a concrete > example what SST does, which problem it solves and how it differs from > existing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]

Hi all, I would like to thank the Incubator community for adding me to the IPMC and am proud to cast my first (binding) vote in the IPMC for the latest NuttX release: +1 (binding) to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 I checked: * Signatures * SHA-512 sums * Incubating in artifact names *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:42 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Hi > > +1 binding from me, with a couple of notes: > > - it could be how I'm extracting your source tars, but the packages are > ending up in a directory child to it. We typically look for the > LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in the root folder.

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 8:13 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > I think the understanding here is that, for incubator projects, only the > votes from IPMC members are 'binding'. Maybe we could change the wording > next time to avoid confusion. > > There are 4 PPMC members voted +1, so we have enough PPMC

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]

To show my support: +1 (non-binding) Cheers, Nathan On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 7:58 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > > 10.1.0. > > > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.0.0 [RC0]

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 3:56 PM Brennan Ashton wrote: > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 10.0.0. +1 (non-binding, to show my support :-) Thanks to everyone in the NuttX community and Incubator for helping to make this release possible! Development

Re: [DISCUSS] New builds server and who should access

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:50 PM Josh Fischer wrote: > 2.) Why just IPMC members? Seems it could be helpful/empowering to allow > committers access to this folder to help when they want to/can. I can > also see that opening this folder up to all incubator committers increases > the possibility

Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 [RC2]

Hello IPMC, Ping!! Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 [RC2] is awaiting your review and vote. If we could please get a show of support from IPMC members and our mentors, that would be great! Cheers, Nathan -- Forwarded message - From: Brennan Ashton Date: Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 [RC2]

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 7:42 PM Brennan Ashton wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 9.1.0. > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release > Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 9.1.0. > > We now kindly

Re: [NOMINATION] Self nominate to be a mentor of Apache NuttX

On 5/11/20, Duo Zhang wrote: > Hi, NuttX community, I'm Duo Zhang, I would like to self nominate to be a > mentor of Apache Nuttx, since I'm the only person among 3 binding votes who > have successfully built NuttX in the 9.0.0 vote thread. Just joking :) > > Last year when Greg and David came to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.0.0 [RC1]

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:51 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > 72 hours in a minimum not a maximum. I suggest you ask and encourage your > other mentors to vote. > > Thanks, > Justin Agreed. Please, if we could get our other mentors, Flavio, Junping, and Mohammad, to check out our release artifacts and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.0.0 [RC1]

On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:27 AM Brennan Ashton wrote: > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 9.0.0. +1 (non-binding) Nathan

Re: [MENTORS] Podling reports are due 5th

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:13 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Reports are due today, still missing are: > Annotator** > NuttX* > PageSpeed > Pinot > Ratis > S2Graph > SDAP > Taverna** > > * which I know is being worked on > ** Did not report last month Hello, The NuttX report has been

Re: How to subscribe (was: Incubator PMC members not subscribed to private list)

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:14 AM Shane Curcuru wrote: > If Justin's still volunteering for this (thanks!), I suggest sending one > last reminder to people not subscribed (with the above link), wait a > week, and then remove those still not subscribed from the IPMC. If they > aren't on private@,

Re: [VOTE] Accept NuttX into the Apache Incubator

nding) to show my support for NuttX becoming an Apache podling and in gratitude for both the Apache and NuttX communities, respectively. Thank you, Nathan Hartman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] NuttX Proposal

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:55 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > Another person has requested to be an initial committer. If possible, > please add him to the proposal as well: Nathan Hartman > > > Greg Thank you, Greg. I've subscribed to this mailing list and I'll await further instru