doing away with it?
Sorry for being unclear. My suggestion was that the IPMC only votes
in the exceptional case where an IPMC member requests a vote. My
assertion is that oversight and the opportunity to intercede when
needed is sufficient.
> Thanks,
> Justin
- Sam Ruby
-
re adopted by the IPMC, I will offer to help
update [1] to reflect that a different process applies during
incubation.
- Sam Ruby
[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[2] https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/PMC_Membership_Change_Process.html
enient mechanism to query
this information.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
egal) is empowered to make business
decisions on behalf of the ASF. This would include pulling a release
or disbanding a committee.
Now I'm not suggesting that you start vetoing anything. I'm just
saying that should you find yourself in a position where a veto is
necessary, don'
or more ways, given that those deviations are
documented, there exists a plan to fix those deviations, and that
podling graduation is gated on the fixing of those deficiencies.
> Thanks,
> Justin
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
s we comply with the terms of that license.
In the case of strong copyleft licenses, that could mean that the
podling release itself may need also be GPL licensed.
2) Is it legal to include compiled code in releases? Yes.
3) Is it legal to include copyright violations in releases? No.
>
n approach I have found much more successful: come up with a
proposal. Often times it will get approved. Some times you will be
asked to make changes. And some times you will get yelled at.
But one thing you will get is a crisp answer.
- Sam Ruby
P.S. Don't take this advice as recommending t
ard/calendar.html
We need to figuring out what the desired end result (currently I
believe that this is spec'ed someplace as less than 80 characters per
line and no wiki markup, but I forget where), and then work backwards
to figure out when these changes are to be mad. It
e done, you might be able to save a
good fraction of that half hour a month of effort.
> Thanks,
> Justin
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
iting after that to fix things. It usually takes an hour of my time.
Perhaps next time, save the before and after and the whimsy team can
take a look at how much of it can be automated.
> Thanks,
> Justin
- Sam Ruby
-
as been to continue to allow the text format be
edited directly (and many of us still find that to be convenient at
times).
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 7:29 AM Shane Curcuru wrote:
>
> Sam Ruby wrote on 4/12/19 9:48 PM:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
> >>
> >> 3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
> >> report, and it dutifully str
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> 3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
> report, and it dutifully strips out the previous report (up to said
> row of dashes) an inserts a new report.
Here is the regular expression in ques
s a bug in whimsey that cause the reports to be doubled I’ll check today
> and fix in SVN if needed but the only issue shod be sign off and comment on
> Spot.
Careful, or I will may make whimsy reject any incubator report that
contains attachment separator li
ts own, and contains one or
more lines that look line and end of report.
3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
report, and it dutifully strips out the previous report (up to said
row of dashes) an in
continue to update
as new TLPs are created and projects are retired. There may
occasionally be special cases to handle like the rename of Zest =>
Polygene.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
les, Tomcat, Turbine, Velocity,
Web Services< Xalan, Xerces, XML Graphics, Yetus, Zookepper
Non-code PMC:
Attic, Community Development, Incubator, Labs, Public Relations
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
'incubator' was
not found in the establish resolution, which makes sense as no
establish resolution was found.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I've gone ahead and added information from podlings.xml to this data.
We have a number of entries which are in podlings.xml but don't
contain incubator in their establishment resolution (Tika, Tapestry,
Pig, Myfaces...)
- Sam Ruby
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 8:08 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
esolutions, and some
projects like comdev -- while technically "bypassing" the incubator --
are not the types of projects you are looking for.
- Sam Ruby
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 7:28 AM Sharan Foga wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> Does anyone know if there is a list of projects that byp
40262f1b12407af@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
As to your third question... I guess it would be possible (but weird)
for somebody to want to stop as a mentor but continue as a committer
(and possibly a PMC member).
- Sam Ruby
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:57 AM sebb wrote:
>
> Are podling mentors expected to be in
know, it is a button,
> however only infra and secretary can push that button.
Correct. The authority required to execute that request is the same
authority required to delete (or modify) any PMC or podling.
> John
- Sam Ruby
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:33 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
tion was maintained in one place. A
place that can be used for things like authentication. That place is
LDAP.
- Sam Ruby
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:38 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> Just as a reminder, podling rosters only need to be maintained in whimsy.
>>
>&
by
> this, change the name to "First Apache release" or something.
>
> 8. Provide the ability to lookup the information required to fill out
> the status page. How can a podling find out when the SGA was received?
> Please remember that podling personnel can change during incubatio
alidations. Submitting that form should update the
appropriate YAML file in svn, and potentially notify various lists of
the change.
If people can provide the information above for a single field, I can
implement that change for the first field and people can use that as
an example to do the same f
Sorry about that. Fixed. Thanks for reviewing the output!
- Sam Ruby
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Adina Crainiceanu wrote:
> John,
>
> I'm a committer and PPMC member for Rya
>
> Adina
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 12:23 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>>
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 7:58 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:58 AM sebb wrote:
>
>> On 11 June 2017 at 00:18, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> For that reason,
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all mentors
> are PPMC members, and all PPMC members are committers.
Existing records that violate one or more assumptions:
https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podl
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:20 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> - List of repositories. For github it's easy, we can just link to a
> search. Can't say the same for ASF hosted (yet)
Would these help?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/a
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> YAML is more human editable than JSON. As Sebb points out elsewhere,
> it also supports comments.
Alternative: create DOAP files for podlings. In general, model
podlings like PMCs as much and as soon as possible.
-
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:49 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:44 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> Some of the data that you mentioned doesn't need to be in the status
>> file as it can be generated from other sources. For example:
>> https://whi
can copy/paste.
This not only will save a few minutes, the resolution will contain the
correct names and ids.
- Sam Ruby
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:11 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:40 AM sebb wrote:
>
>> On 6 June 2017 at 04:22, John D. Ament wrote:
>
" at the bottom
of the page. It can help you draft a resolution that contains correct
names and IDs, etc.
> Suma
- Sam Ruby
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Suma Shivaprasad
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
ges.
> Thanks
> Suma
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
a establish PMC resolution to the board agenda.
- Sam Ruby
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:33 PM Suma Shivaprasad
wrote:
>
>> Dear Incubator members,
>>
>> Please note that the community vote for graduating Apache Atlas to TLP
has
>> commenced and has so far receive
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:19 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>>> Adding a new committer, PPMC member, or mentors should be a matter a few
>>> mouse clicks and se
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:19 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> Gitbox has been updated, our ponymail installation has been updated, our
>> svn server will be updated soon. Other services will be updated as well.
>>
> Wh
wse/WHIMSY-90; which might
not be practical as stated due to difference in access control between
the various lists. Even if that turns out to be the case, a tool can be
created to identify differences and enable bulk updating.
- Sam Ruby
Whimsy should fix...
> None of my subscriptions to any private PMC lists that I'm on
> are with my a.o address, and I'm guessing I'm not unique there.
Any email address you add via id.apache.org may be accessed via the
dropdown at http
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> ...The very first line of this thread is a link to an INFRA ticket. A
>> comment on that ticket links to this very thread...
>
> Ok thanks! It would be nice t
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> ...Can I just work with the infrastructure team to
>> make this happen? Do we need a formal vote?..
>
> As Marvin explains very well I don't think we ne
ook at the committer vs PPMC thing, one other item may be to not
> email private@incubator for new podling committers - its not relevant to us.
cc private@incubator only for PPMC changes but not committer changes... got it.
- Sam Ruby
---
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 11:09 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:23 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> What's the next step? Can I just work with the infrastructure team to
>> make this happen? Do we need a formal vote?
>>
> Can you clarify what exactly you
What's the next step? Can I just work with the infrastructure team to
make this happen? Do we need a formal vote?
- Sam Ruby
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Background, from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13804
>
>> With this feedback and review
ur
> notification scheme easily in github -
> https://github.com/settings/notifications - uncheck "Automatically Watch
> Repositories"
I think I covered that in the paragraph that begins with "I believe
that asking all IPMC members to uncheck "Automatically watch"...
mbers have commit privileges on all Incubator repositories.
I believe that the alternative is technically feasible: have each
podling manage a list of committers for that podling:
https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/
- Sam Ruby
-
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:51 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:25 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Felix Meschberger
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Sam
>> >
>> > Like this very much. Thanks !
>> >
and to the PMC, so that's the reason for
the extra step.
The plans are to open up the PMC interface to all members of the PMC,
and not just PMC chairs.
No question that the PPMC interface can be streamlined, but let's let
the current code 'bake' for a brief period be
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Current status: for ppmcs that have lists in the subversion puppet
> definitions, those lists have been loaded into LDAP, and augmented with
> mentor information from podlings.xml. A list of all current podlings can be
> found her
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:57 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:11 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
>> wrote:
>> > Not sure what was the decision to be made here, but +1 to all
>> suggestions.
>>
private list designated, it
goes to private@incubator.
If people would like, I could always copy private@incubator on all
changes for additional oversight. That might be a bit much, however.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: g
for PMCs to which they
don't belong. Other PMC members who aren't PMC chairs can't update
their own lists.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Debo Dutta
Charith Elvitigala
Note that John Ament indicated his intention to vote -1 on any
OpenWhisk release until the "GitHub as master" issue is resolved by
the Apache Infrastructure team.
- Sam Ruby
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Now that the discussion
hours. Please VOTE as follows
[] +1 Accept OpenWhisk into the Apache Incubator
[] +0 Abstain.
[] -1 Do not accept OpenWhisk into the Apache Incubator because ...
The proposal is listed below, but you can also access it on the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWhiskProposal
- Sam Ruby
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:45 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see
>> &g
, for quite some time now, has been to resolve GitHub as a
Master one way or another. It is time to do so. If the conclusion is
that GitHub as a Master is not to be, OpenWhisk will need to be
migrated at that time. Until then, there is no reason to migrate it
only to potentially migrate it back.
EU, so
probably early December.
- Sam Ruby
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 15:24 Chris Mattmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has
>> requested to use GitHub as its primary master. Greg Stein our ASF Infra
>> Adm
is a very real, statistical possibility,
> and be serious in our efforts in ensuring this podling/project
> can and will survive that.
Agreed on both points: this is a general concern that should apply
everywhere, and given IBM's past history is particularly relevant to
this propos
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache OpenWhisk.
>>
>> The text of the proposal is included below. Additional
forward to your feedback and input.
- Sam Ruby
OpenWhisk Proposal
/OpenWhisk is an open source, distributed //Serverless/
<https://developer.ibm.com/openwhisk/what-is-serverless-computing/>/computing
platform able to execute application logic (Actions) in response to
events (Triggers
On 2016-09-02 12:41 (-0400), Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Longer term this change would lay the groundwork for more fine-grained
> access control whereever it may be desired: not just for svn, but also
> for web pages, git, and any other location that can be configured to use
> LDA
rs, with mentors providing oversight.
> Many podlings don't have a clear distinction - at least not in listings.
> Perhaps they should..
>From a technical point of view, that's not an issue. So the question
is what does the IPMC want here?
- Sam Ruby
> On 22 Sep 2016
Actually adding gstein this time.
- Sam Ruby
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> cc += gstein
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>> Did this conclude..? Just in case it didn't, here's my +1 as well to
>> make podli
o submit an account request, you might
want to try https://whimsy.apache.org/officers/acreq/; it loads much
faster than https://id.apache.org/acreq/; if you like it, spread the
word.
- Sam Ruby
> On 2 September 2016 at 18:52, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, John D.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> The first stage would be migrating existing lists to LDAP. This will
>> require some small changes to whimsy and the phone book application.
>> The whole eff
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 02/09/2016 17:41, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> To prepare, we will need to decide who gets to modify these lists, and
>> who gets notified. I propose that members of podlings be able to modify
>> the list, and the private list
e-grained
access control whereever it may be desired: not just for svn, but also
for web pages, git, and any other location that can be configured to use
LDAP to obtain ACL information.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe,
I can make these changes.
All of this can be developed and tested on your own machine, and will
automatically be deployed via a push.
Instructions on getting started (including running tests) can be found here:
https://github.com/apache/whimsy/tree/master/www/board/agenda#readme
- Sam Ruby
>
d agenda application to take a different
data source?
You could have svn as a data source, and have a web interface.
> Shouldn't take long to make that :)
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incu
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:19 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 5:52 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:21 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > Over the past 2 months, mostly in the days leading up to sen
uld be available to all of Whimsy's applications, and
not be locked into this one. It also will make this script even
smaller.
- Sam Ruby
> John
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on
> accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato.
>
> This vote will run for the usual 72 hours.
+1 (binding)
e. What is listed is the bare bones
> group of people who have worked on Pony Mail in one way or the other (I
> should probably add Sam Ruby to that list), there are other peripheral
> people who are curious but also have no experience with Apache.
Too late, I've already added myself. :-)
oolkit.
It was proposed as a separate project from the beginning by a member
of the Open Office community.
- Sam Ruby
> Harbs
>
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>> Both great ideas. Thank
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part
>> >
>> > ht
o make a recommendation one way or
another, but not seeing anything worth adding. I honestly don't know
what to recommend.
- Sam Ruby
> John
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I agree with Justin.
>>
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > * Graduations
>> >
>> > The board has motions for the following:
>>
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> * Graduations
>
> The board has motions for the following:
>
> - Sentry
Not... yet. :-)
Does somebody intend to post this to the agenda?
- Sam Ruby
-
ir/our
license, we are obligated to include it in our NOTICE file (see Apache
License, Version 2 section 4, item d). Others can weigh in on short
vs long form of the licenses (it is a single copy, so I personally
don't see the issue), but as a legally required notice, it
PIng? Can I get a confirmation that you are OK with Toree proceeding
under similar circumstances? They are actively working towards a
release.
If you like, I can open a legal JIRA or move this to legal-discuss.
- Sam Ruby
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, Feb
uld be OK
too?
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
e https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-86 for an example of
> where incubating releases were allowed with a runtime dependency on a
> non-approved license. Just as Greg laid out, a plan was proposed for
> removing the dependency before graduation and the VP Legal at the
>
el
with a 'y':
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moons_of_Jupiter#List
Example: Eyropa.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
be a
no-brainer.
> If it's not, then that's going to be a fundamental barrier to releasing Torii
> as ASF-signed off artifacts
- Sam Ruby
[1] http://zeromq.org/area:licensing
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Luciano Resende
>>> wrote:
>>>> After in
+1 (binding)
- Sam Ruby
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on the
> acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The
> full proposal is
> available at the end of this
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> And that goes, as always, to the question "Who makes the decision about the
> _right_ level of trust".
The community.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscri
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> >
>> > Don't shut down trunk/master for product development.
>>
>> I don't believ
development
model available to a project. As an example, I've seen models where
'trunk/master is for product maintenance', and all development occurs
in a branch explicitly designated as where work on the next release is
to occur.
- Sam Ruby
--
(including apparently BigTop), RTC could lead to
problems, and CTR is arguably more appropriate. I'm fine with that
too.
- Sam Ruby
P.S. My personal preference remains CTR. I would much rather be
reverted with an explanation than to be ignored without one.
---
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>>
>> P.S. To be clear: I am not a fan of RTC when applied to release.next
>> branches.
>
> I'd appreciate your explanation of this, as "most" CT
esn't that mean that it isn't really all
that destructive?
As a Director, would you consider stop approving reports from ASF
projects that operate under a RTC model? If not, aren't you sending a
mixed message?
- Sam Ruby
P.S. To be clear: I am not a fan of RTC when applied
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ross Gardler
>> wrote:
>> > Good point. I should add to my comments that even a CTR project uses RTC
>> for non-co
I believe that is a
> given.
Let me be pedantic for a moment. While RTC projects that use
Subversion may disallow work in branches, even by committers; such a
restriction isn't even possible in Git -- even for non committers.
> Ross
- Sam Ruby
> -Original Message-
> From: sa3r
+1 here too.
Most projects here fall somewhere in a spectrum between "do whatever
you want in a branch" and "don't release without having others approve
your work". Different projects put the point where CTR crosses over
to RTC at different points.
*shrug*
- Sam Ruby
it
> sounds like it is the spark-core module, which this obviously isn't.
That name is indeed unlikely to survive incubation, particularly if
this result of graduation is a separate PMC (as opposed to, say,
becoming a subproject
The powers that be (a.k.a., the board) either need to reinstate Jim as
VP of Affairs or find a replacement, and then hold that individual
(and associated committee) accountable for revisiting this issue.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscri
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:09 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:07 AM Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> >...
>>
>> > I'm a bit bothered by the fact that this would mean that the communit
o make sure that we capture all of the
relevant history (IP provenance) for posterity.
> Would github PR's fall under the same premise, since the contents of those
> mails become public record?
See above.
- Sam Ruby
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:51 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On
external
developer is already an ASF committer."
Source: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
At a minimum, the word "SVN" should be removed. Any other changes
people feel are necessary?
- Sam Ruby
-
To u
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2015 1:01 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> > On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>> >>...
>> >>
1 - 100 of 448 matches
Mail list logo
