english speaking communities…at least that was
not the ASF I saw when I joined.
rgds
jan I.
On 11 November 2016 at 08:14, Jeff Genender wrote:
> I would think that English is generally used because its the most
> international language, not because its the most used in the world. Thus
>
t you and bertrand goes in to help, but it would have been
great if you had supported the mentors and believed what we as mentors told
IPMC.
Sorry for a strong mail, but seeing a Podling go down the drain for
something that should be logical caused me to respond like this.
Rgds
jan i.
>
new home.
rgds
jan i.
hoping that will change! :-)
>
That has changed a lot, I have been with embedded controllers for about 20
years, and the difference is like black and white. I used to work for very
big companies and they promote opensource quite heavely(which was my part
of the business).
But looking
se
> interested in ODF.
>
As far as I can see ODF Toolkit is written in Java, so it is not that easy
to use the code.
The philosophy of ODF Toolkit also seems quite different than the
filters/lenses of Corinthia.
But of course corinthia need all the positive attention it can get.
rgds
jan i
w you to do
similar work
off hours, if not granted it is considered a contract breach and in any
case copyright belong
to the company.
I had many problems with exact this part in my companies. We ended up by
writing a generic
disclaimer to all, that what they did off hours, belonge
+1 (binding)
have fun
rgds
jan i
On Tuesday, September 1, 2015, moon soo Lee wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:43 PM Atri Sharma > wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > On 1 Sep 2015 04:43, "Edward J. Yoon" > wrote:
> >
>
ut I will
post it on private@ and I think it is something we should formalize
(podling and private)
Sorry John, not going to write in public what content it is, that is
private :-)
(as member You know where to look anyhow)
rgds
jan i
>
> - Shane
>
> >
> > John
> >
> > O
Hi.
I really like our open way of reporting using the wiki but we have a small
flaw in the procedure.
The wiki is not the place to report a section, so I
will send it to private@i.a.o and hope it will be included.
rgds
jan i.
On 29 August 2015 at 01:00, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greeti
Hi
thanks for voting,
we have 3 +1 , 0 +0, 0 -1.
We will continue making the release artifacts.
rgds
jan i.
On 23 August 2015 at 13:43, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - file names contain incubator rather
+1 (binding)
have fun
jan i
On Friday, August 28, 2015, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Tim, there were a couple of additional IPMC votes you can close the vote
> with a result thread:
>
> http://markmail.org/thread/h7pwrlvoousj6x2q
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim B
Sorry I did mean to write:
Vote runs at least until Thursday 27th August or continue until we have the
needed 3 +1.
rgds
jan i.
On 23 August 2015 at 10:24, jan i wrote:
> Hi
>
> The corinthia podling have voted on a release and would now like the IPMC
> to vote.
>
> We t
making our first release.
rgds
jan i.
-- Forwarded message --
From: jan i
Date: 23 August 2015 at 10:10
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
To: "d...@corinthia.incubator.apache.org"
Hi
I am pleased to announce that we can continue with our releas
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i
On Saturday, August 15, 2015, Brian Cho wrote:
> Thank you Chris and Justin for your thorough checks.
>
> We could really use a third IPMC vote :)
>
> -Brian
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
+1 (binding)
have fun
jan i
On Friday, August 14, 2015, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, P. Taylor Goetz > wrote:
> > Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE for
> > Accepting Apex as a new Apache Incubator projec
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:19 PM, jan i >
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, John D. Ament > wrote:
>
> > I would not be so strict with the deadline, as it is does not seem to
> > interfere with th
dline, as it is does not seem to
interfere with the additional work with the report.
>
> Multiple other sections of the report need to be updated and the
> podlings.xml file updated as well.
I note especially it is not signed off by any mentors, that would be a no
go for me, and a new report
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i
On Monday, August 10, 2015, Dave wrote:
> The Usergrid project has made three releases from the Incubator (1.0.0,
> 1.0.1 and 1.0.2), has added multiple and diverse committers, and the
> project has completed all required items on the graduation chec
o share all the community aspects (emails, commiters, etc.)
This makes perfect sense to me, and having one community delivering 2
different releases is not a problem, at the most some logistic issues.
Look forward to the vote.
rgds
jan i
ps. I too would recommend to start with a smalle
the
IPMC vote.
rgds
jan i
>
> Andy
>
> On 05/08/15 12:11, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The Apache Taverna Incubator PPMC has voted +5 to release
>>
>> Apache Tavern
contain the test we cannot see it as broken, or ?
rgds
jan i.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
tually those test cases will be rewritten.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Background: We have (accidentally) a dependency to a snapshot version
> for a library but only in maven scope.
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
responsibility to the board.
The Chair cannot and should not be able to "nudge" more than any other PMC.
rgds
jan i.
>
> I can also imagine the maturity model items being used on an exception
> basis, only reporting maturity-model deviations and how they are being
> addresse
tools would be desirable to use.
I want to make sure I have not overlooked a policy or rule.
rgds
jan i.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 12:04
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: third party
r ask than have to cut a new release candidate).
rgds
jan i.
t
overweight to control everything is seen (and are) a negative effect,
anything
that can reduce that is good.
I think the maturity model is good, but to used with care. If I think of
the same podling as Dennis, that would clearly be a test done too early.
rgds
jan i.
>
> - Dennis
>
d during the approval in the general@ list. Which were very
> helpful to us.
>
> I agree, but nothing prevents that the mentor ask when in doubt,
especially the
first one, we do not need to force every release to pass general@ for that
( unless
we don't trust the mentors).
rgds
jan i
>
efficient, reduce our inboxes,
and give us spare time to concentrate on other things.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i.
ps. when you write to IPMC directly please include general@ we are lazy and
do reply-all.
On 23 July 2015 at 01:57, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Thanks! I definitely owe you glass of wine when we met in person ;)
>
> But, unfortunately we need the +1 in the gene
hen follow
> with the rest of required steps like moving artifacts, etc.
>
Agree the 72 hours is the key. But please it is custom when calling a vote
to set a deadline.
Congrats with the release.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Thanks
> Cos
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:31PM, moon
about the people behind the actual commits, that
seems to be left open ?
Concerns have been raised about the homepage, that seems to be left open ?
When it comes to voting time, those are the questions I will check if
answered in an acceptable apache way, if so I am +1,
rgds
jan I.
On 23 July 2015
or apachecon CORE has just been published, and apache big
data is expected to folllow next week.
rgds
jan i
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards!
> -
>
> Luke Han
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, jan i >
> wrote:
>
> >
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015, Richard Downer wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 at 09:32 jan i > wrote:
>
> > > Sorry I'm a bit late! I've modified the wiki page to add Brooklyn to
> the
> > > list of full talks, and volunteer myself for
+1 (binding)
jan i.
On 22 July 2015 at 10:31, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> > On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted
> > the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the
> > proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to t
chedule is fixed and talks have been grouped, changes in
the wiki page made now is
only for historic reasons and will in no way be moved to the schedule.
The shark tank is different.
on behalf of the apachecon team
jan i.
>
> Cheers
> Richard.
>
th the diversity, then the report should include information on the
number of unique organizations currently represented in its PMC and
committership.
If diversity did not matter for TLPs, the above explanation and guidelines
are false
I think not.
rgds
jan I.
>
>
> >
> > W
ubator too).
rgds
jan i.
cleared to go
jan i.
>
> Thanks
> Ross
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Barham [mailto:tim.bar...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 11:53 PM
> To: d...@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.30
>
> Vote
se of a minor issue. If the apache process would not be so slow, we
> would of course have made it different. But waiting another 6 days, while
> some will be in holidays already, would have been a problem.
Security problems must be dealt with as fast as possible even if it means
twisting
+1 (binding)
have fun
jan i
On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Rich Bowen wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 07/13/2015 06:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> For the source releases I checked:
>> - incubating in artefact name
>
take a look at the proposal and give my
comments. Maybe more if I can see I can benefit the project.
rgds
jan i.
On 8 July 2015 at 14:14, Kris Popat wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I’m writing to the incubator list because we have a project, which we are
> very keen to be incubated in Apache
in Github, you come with code, and see if others get interested in using
it.
It is 2 different ways of starting great software with different benefits
and disadvantages,
rgds
jan i.
>
> Stefan
>
uld only pick up one
> event to present?
>
It is 2 different events with different CFP. The incubator track is in
CORE, but of course
you can submit a talk to big data as well.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Best Regards!
> -
>
> Luke Han
>
&g
g read the last couple of emails.
rgds
jan i.
On 29 June 2015 at 20:53, Gavin Li wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I agree with you. I've updated the proposal to include a little bit more
> explanations about the difference with Hadoop.
>
> Purely pursuing novelty is never our int
ber that for a full talk you need to submit a proposal
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-core-europe/
including a speaker name.
hint: 36 hours to go.
thanks in advance
rgds
jan i.
> Thanks
> Bosco
>
>
> On 6/29/15, 10:09 AM, "jan i" wrote:
>
give the rights todo so (UID:
> AnatoleTresch)?
>
updated
have fun
jan i.
>
> Thanks,
> Anatole
>
>
> 2015-06-27 23:10 GMT+02:00 Roman Shaposhnik :
>
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Pierre Smits
> > wrote:
> > > Roman,
> > >
> > > Ther
On Saturday, June 27, 2015, Hendrik Dev wrote:
> I submitted a "full" Johnzon talk already.
> (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.html)
super did you write. podling/incubator somewhere?
alternatively please give me the title.
rgds
jan i
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2
erent
binaries in their release which are needed for the project
(not only test data), and looking at our TLP projects nobody complains.
Maybe we should try to find another definition here.
rgds
jan i.
>
> -- Brane
>
>
nding your email directly to the podlings ML, I have
noticed many podlings committers are not subscribed here.
I will answer your other questions on the other threads.
rgds
jan i
On 19 June 2015 at 08:35, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Great! Since it seems plausible let me start a wiki
> p
+1 (binding)
have fun
jan i.
On 19 June 2015 at 15:10, Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
> +1
>
> Jacopo
>
> > On Jun 19, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato
> wrote:
> >
> > Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE
> to accept
+1 (binding)
jan i
On Wednesday, June 17, 2015, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Status page looks good and seems like very healthy community.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Henry
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Joe Witt > wrote:
> > Hello Apache Incubator
> >
> >
ch is where the adjustment
> to 'interactive' came from. Should these minor rephrasings give pause in
> the nifi community we will pass that forward.
>
+1
rgds
jan i.
> On Jun 14, 2015 11:33 AM, "jan i" wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Sorry for top posting, I
resolution that the community agrees on.
rgds
jan i.
On 14 June 2015 at 17:18, Joe Witt wrote:
> Adjusted to clarify the 'realtime' reference which can be misleading:
>
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundatio
thanks for the responses I will cast a +1 at vote time.
sorry for asking the questions, but I was insecure.
rgds
jan i
On Friday, June 12, 2015, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Sean sure makes more sense than me.
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Joe Witt > wrote:
> > Se
ly formalities),
but one
reason to be in incubator is to learn "the apache way" and that seems hard
to
learn without other apache people on the project.
my 2ct.
rgds
jan i.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscr
Since this is a discussion, it would be nice to see a bit of statitic like
- number of releases in incubator
- growth in incubator
etc.
rgds
jan i
On Thursday, June 11, 2015, Joe Witt wrote:
> Hello Apache Incubator,
>
> At the suggestion of our mentors the NiFi community es
+1
jan i
On 28 May 2015 at 18:50, Timothy Chen wrote:
> +1
>
> Tim
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Chris Aniszczyk
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jake Farrell
> wrote:
> >
> >> Based on the earlier d
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i.
On 27 May 2015 at 17:17, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> IPMC,
>
> we are one vote short here and the absence of this release is blocking
> Apache
> Bigtop 1.0 from getting into RC. Could you please take a look and vote?
> Thanks
> in advance!
>
On Friday, May 8, 2015, Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> Maybe in as many places as possible we could spell out the portmanteau as
> Mysos: MySQL on Mesos.
+1 count me in as being confused, but this suggestion helps.
rgds
jan i
>
> Yan
> ---
> Jiang Yan Xu > | @xujyan <
>
+1 (binding)
have fun
jan i.
On Friday, May 1, 2015, Dilli Arumugam wrote:
> +1
>
> On 5/1/15 10:52 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" > wrote:
>
> >+1
> >
> >Thanks Venkatesh for the proposal. Apache Atlas is a great addition to
> >Apache Hadoop ecosyste
ts.
>
I thought the pTLP was also there to help in case of OS upgrades and other
external
things that might affect the running whimsy service.
rgds
jan i.
>
> I'm +1 and will join.
>
> - Shane
>
> >
> > Ross
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
If this becomes a TLP project is infra then prepared to support keeping
whimsy running 24/7,
or do they have additional requirements on the project?
maybe the response to the above could be worked into the proposal.
rgds
jan i
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
> -
d
> >disclaimer and that’s my concern, and their wording seems to suggest that
> >we don’t have permission to use them.
>
> To me, the first sentence gives us permission to use on the page. The
> second sentence says that you can’t use it any other way.
Removing other trademarks is always a good idea, if nothing else it reduces
the level
of confusion.
all these edits need not be completed before the donation is tranferred,
but should be before
any real publication.
rgds
jan i
> -Alex
>
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i
On Monday, April 20, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is avai
t; Incubator.
> > [ ] +0 Abstain.
> > [ ] -1 Don’t accept Apache Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer into the
> > Apache Incubator
> > because…
>
> +1
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i
> -louis (non-binding)
> PS this came across with double bang priority. Really?
>
> >
en to be both IPMC and PMC in labs, so if there is interest I would
be happy to carry this idea
forward.
rgds
jan i.
>
> So, I wouldn't hold it against people - turn it on ourselves - how can
> we create a process to facilitate people who aren't ready yet?
>
> FWIW,
all of the mentors
> traveling, I don't think there's been any vote from any of the
> mentors. (I am a guilty party there)
I am not confident casting a vote, not knowing the opinion of the mentors.
The mentors
might see things that are not ob
On 13 April 2015 at 19:19, Greg Chase wrote:
> jan i apache.org> writes:
>
> >
> > On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD:
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geod
+1 (binding)
jan i.
On 13 April 2015 at 17:46, Jake Farrell wrote:
> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
> has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
> members), 3 community)
>
> Status page: http://incub
was one of those that suggested
this way.
The concerns raised below are very similar to my concerns, but they have to
with graduation,
and not entering Incubator. Most importantly both Mentors and the team are
aware of
the potential problems.
rgds
jan i
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at
). F.x. Corinthia is
registered as a print font and hotel chain, but that was not a problem.
I think it is a good proposal and the project seems to have good chances of
growing under the wings of apache.
rgds
jan i
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Roman Shaposhn
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:05 AM, jan i >
> wrote:
> > But even so In Corinthia we bended the rules and imported directly into
> out
> > git repo. This still ensures a record == initial commit.
>
> I trust
out
git repo. This
still ensures a record == initial commit.
The important message here is that ASF must acknowledge the grant before it
comes into
any of our repos.
just my opinion, I am not the legal expert
jan i
>
>
> Cheers
> Niclas
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:29 AM
+1 binding no Aprils fool.
rgds
jan i
On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - issues from last release fixed
> - hashes and signatures correct
> - has disclaimer
> - notice and license correct (but see discussion for
t; trouble.
Thanks all for the replies, I keep learning. We have decided on the bullet
proof method, by creating a new non-asf git repo.
thanks
jan i
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: gen
x27;re welcome to.
+1 but if they do, let it count as the first of the 3 month reportinh.
rgds
jan i
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>
> For
opinion, the IPMC "simulates" board, and should allow the podlings as
much freedom as possible, hence allow consensus even though a podling has
no chair.
Thoughts ?
rgds
jan i
The idea is good, but it takes someone to manage it consistently, exactly
what we have with @TheASF.
so I am +1 to keep @TheASF
But if someone is committing to maintaining @ASFIncubator I am happy with
that.
rgds
jan I.
On 24 March 2015 at 08:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> +1 to k
useful for new
> projects incubating, so wanted to share with you all. We can improve the
> document further and I can update the incubator doc itself with the
> checklist if the doc looks fine.
Nice doc.
rgds
jan i
>
> Thanks
> Amareshwari
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
; Are people ok with using this list and the Incubator wiki for those things?
+1 of course
rgds
jan i
>
> The Incubator PMC won't have a say in how those projects proceed, but
> as this is about creating new projects, and as a number of steps are
> similar to incoming or graduating p
.
Thanks in advance fellow Mentors for helping me.
rgds
jan I.
+1 (binding)
good luck
jan I.
On 19 March 2015 at 17:00, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Roman Shaposhnik
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 2
nicely in ASF.
rgds
jan I.
On 11 March 2015 at 19:58, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It is my pleasure and privilege to open up the following
> proposal:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
> for wide discussion before conducting and IPMC
> vote on it.
ase also be aware that a committer does not need to produce
code. We have many project (like e.g. AOO) where people who make
e.g. translations, documentation or tests are committers. Committers are
people who care about contributing to the project over time, independent of
what type they contribute to
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:08 PM, jan i >
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Having just skimmed the proposal, that in general look good, one thing
> > caught my eye.
> >
> > The proposal talks sev
+0 I am really concerned about the diversity of the initial committers,
what happens if the university pulls the plug. I know we all say it will
never happen, but it could happen.
rgds
jan i.
On 10 March 2015 at 16:20, Alan Gates wrote:
> +1
>
> Alan.
>
> Thejas Nair
> M
On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:53 PM, jan i >
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi general@,
> >>
> >>
ewis J. McGibbney*
> John D. Ament (Gary is now on board as mentor)
> Rob Vesse
> Hadrian Zbarcea
> Sergio Fernández
> Henry Saputra*
> Jan Iversen
I am IPMC too.
rgds
jan i
> Andy Seaborne*
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> [0] +0/-0 I am neither y
+1 good luck
jan i
On Friday, February 27, 2015, Henry Saputra wrote:
> +1
>
> Looks like very strong initial members =)
> Good luck guys
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
> > wrote:
> > Hi general@,
> >
> > Over the last while
me all initial committers from
the same company is just as big a problem as mentors. when everyone
involved are from the same company then that signals a serious problem
which should be addressed before starting a vote.
rgds
jan i
>
> I am not sure this is a good start for Apache podling.
>
+1 binding
jan i
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Alan D. Cabrera
wrote:
> Pretty please? :D
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> > On Feb 24, 2015, at 4:42 AM, Leonidas Fegaras > wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > This vote is open for more than a week and we still
is now written in 3.11 will cover these three points and can be
> removed.
>
>
> The proposal only refer to new projects entering Apache, would it be worth
while to consider a way for projects that entered Incubator recently and
has enough (whatever that is) asf members as committers ?
On 24 February 2015 at 12:19, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 3:36:50 AM jan i wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > Maybe a stupid question, but I cannot find the answer.
> >
> > If we want to add a existing committer (one with an apache ID) to our
>
the person added to incubator, like call a vote
in IPMC ?
I ask because, I know by experience (I was IPMC but not
incubator-committer) that you need to be incubator-committer to use the GIT
repo.
thanks in advance for a short answer.
rgds
jan i.
itters
> * Expanded the PPMC with 4 new members
> * Opened over 1100 jira issues and resolved almost 750 issues
> * A successful community vote to graduate with 26 positive votes
>
> I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
+1 (binding)
jan i
>
> Please vote
>
&
On Sunday, February 22, 2015, Mohit Soni wrote:
> Definitely a +1
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Mohit
>
>
>
> —
> Sent from Mailbox
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon > wrote:
>
> > Hello friends,
> &g
On 21 February 2015 at 21:12, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Discussion has died down, and we had only positive feedback for the
> proposal. Should we start a formal vote ?
>
please do.
rgds
jan i
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Ted Dunning
> wrote:
>
> > On We
hange,
can it be you mix "release vote" with code changes ?
In incubator you do need 3 +1 votes from IPMC to cut a release and of
course consensus in the PPMC, but that is not something the project can
overwrite
with bylaws.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Gianm
ues.
> >
> > The contract is that the customers (the projects) commit to logging
> > the issues they encounter (and if possible make contributions to fix
> > those issues), and the the producer (the Incubator) commits to resolve
> > those issues in a timely fashion.
> >
&
incubator) take a look at the data we have for
each project, and see what is really needed, what is duplicates, and how to
minimize administration !
Thanks humbedooh.
rgds
jan i.
On 6 February 2015 at 10:48, jan i wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can someone please give me a tip, we added Dave Fisher
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
