Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi @Sheng @Justin @Cheng @Clavin, Thanks for your comments so far. If there's no more concern from your point of view, you're welcome to vote in the vote thread[1]. Best, tison. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/dowk7mtw26vg74qcpx4ttjvn9tkwt5qk

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Justin, > How will the existing web site and domain be managed? 1) this website projects will be donated to apache, it has been stated that in Proposal [1] 2) I applied for this domain, and I manage and control it, Currently used to provide official websites and documents, I will cooperate

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

HI, How will the existing web site and domain be managed? [1] Kind Regards, Justin 1. http://www.streamxhub.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Justin, we already know that some category-X class dependencies in StreamPark has risk. We had create an issue[1] to track this. and category-X dependencies list have been updated in Proposal [2], this issue planned to be solved in future releases, until the requirements are fully met. [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

HI, To be clear, this doesn’t need to be solved right now, but the project needs a plan to resolve these issues. i.e. replace the dependencies or some other action. What is decided may also impact your first ASF release and how long it takes to do that. Kind Regards, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

> Please note that Cheng Pan's comment is their own question, which isn't > associated with StreamPark's situation. @tison, I just make the mysql connector license issue clear, it helps the StreamPark team to make decisions about how to resolve the issue. > 1) in kafka connector of streampark

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi, > As @benjobs replied in > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ql5k7j72p2s6hrw6clgpbwp4kmznj1b8, is the > category X issue resolved? I can see that MySQL isn't a hard dependency to > deliver the platform. No it has not, just because it’s not a hard dependancy doesn’t resolve the issue. And also

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

> How about simply changing to Postgres? There is an ongoing issue as mentioned above https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark/issues/1447. @Cheng Pan If you'd like to discuss more on dependencies policy, you can start a dedicated thread. @Justin & @Calvin Please note that Cheng Pan's comment

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

How about simply changing to Postgres? I wouldn't expect StreamPark to depend on some MySQL special features. Simply changing to Postgres should probably resolve the problem, right? Chris On 25.08.22, 08:43, "Calvin Kirs" wrote: Yes, this is consistent with what Justin said. If he is

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Thanks for the clarification. Thanks, Cheng Pan On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 4:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > 1. the project hardly depends on mysql-connector, w/o mysql-connector, > > the project can not work totally. > > This would not be allowed (IMO). > > > 2. some optional

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi, > 1. the project hardly depends on mysql-connector, w/o mysql-connector, > the project can not work totally. This would not be allowed (IMO). > 2. some optional functionalities of the project require > mysql-connector, w/o mysql-connector, the project still works. This might be OK, but

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi, > I would like to learn why mysql-connector is not compatible with the Apache > license? Short version it’s GPL and the “FOSS exception” license is no longer valid. Even it it was it (from my reading) it places a restriction on software that it can only be used with open source

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Yes, this is consistent with what Justin said. If he is optional, then OK. I misunderstood what you meant by 1 :( But if the software does not work without mysql, even if you remove it (mysql) when you distribute it, and then leave it to users to add it themselves. that's not okay either Cheng

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

> 1. the project hardly depends on mysql-connector, w/o mysql-connector, > the project can not work totally. > 2. some optional functionalities of the project require > mysql-connector, w/o mysql-connector, the project still works. > 3. the project use mysql-connector for testing-only purpose, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi JB, With Beam: Beam provides a unified programming model (dataflow), while StreamPark is a platform to package, deploy and operate streaming applications. I'm not quite familiar with Wayang and NiFi, though. Best, tison. Jean-Baptiste Onofré 于2022年8月25日周四 13:26写道： > Hi, > > Interesting

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Cheng Pan 于2022年8月25日周四 13:31写道： > > Hi Justin, > > > The issue is not if it in the release package or not, it cannot be a > > dependency. > > Could you please elaborate more about "dependency"? I can imagine the > following use cases: > > 1. the project hardly depends on mysql-connector, w/o

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Justin, > The issue is not if it in the release package or not, it cannot be a > dependency. Could you please elaborate more about "dependency"? I can imagine the following use cases: 1. the project hardly depends on mysql-connector, w/o mysql-connector, the project can not work totally. 2.

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi, Interesting proposal. How do you compare StreamPark with Apache Beam, Wayang, NiFI ? Thanks Regards JB On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:13 AM tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to propose StreamPark[1] as a new apache incubator project, > you can find the proposal[2] of StreamPark for

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Justin, Add Usage of MySQL: 1) in kafka connector of streampark spark module, MySQL use to store kafka offsets. The connector also provides HBase, Redis for users to choose. MySQL is an optional dependency. 2) in streampark platform module, MySQL use to store backend metadata . Currently,

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Justin, I would like to learn why mysql-connector is not compatible with the Apache license? AFAIK, mysql-connector is dual licensed which is compatible with open source works. The MySQL License page also says[1]: > For developers and distributors of open source software under a FOSS

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi, > Thanks for your feedback! I checked all modules of the project and > reconfirmed it again, the maven scope of mysql-connector is "provided" or > "test", and will not be provided in the release package, The issue is not if it in the release package or not, it cannot be a dependancy. Now if

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Justin, Thanks for your feedback! I checked all modules of the project and reconfirmed it again, the maven scope of mysql-connector is "provided" or "test", and will not be provided in the release package, The latest code has been updated, if there are still problems, we will solve them

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

HI, Exactly how is the mysql-connector now optional? Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Thanks, Issues about GPL and LGPL have been resolved, These dependencies have been changed to optional or deleted. Best, benjobs. Justin Mclean 于2022年8月24日周三 14:02写道： > Hi, > > I notice the project has some GPL and LGPL dependancies, this would not be > compatible with the Apache license,

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Thanks for your guidance, Issues about GPL and LGPL have been resolved, mysql-connector has been changed to optional and The log component has been replaced as log4j2. Best, benjobs. Sheng Wu 于2022年8月24日周三 14:19写道： > Hi StreamPark team > > AFAIK from a Java developer perspective, your GPL

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Thanks. We will solve these problems as soon as possible Sheng Wu 于2022年8月24日 周三14:19写道： > Hi StreamPark team > > AFAIK from a Java developer perspective, your GPL and LGPLthings are > not hard dependencies. The log component could be easier to be > replaced as log4j2, and mysql connector

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi StreamPark team AFAIK from a Java developer perspective, your GPL and LGPLthings are not hard dependencies. The log component could be easier to be replaced as log4j2, and mysql connector should be possible to be optional, such as you pick Postgre as your major storage option. Please be clear

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi, I notice the project has some GPL and LGPL dependancies, this would not be compatible with the Apache license, unless they are optional and the majority of users not use them. If they are not optional, how do you intend to remove these? Kind Regards, Justin

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Please vote in the thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/dowk7mtw26vg74qcpx4ttjvn9tkwt5qk Best, tison. tison 于2022年8月24日周三 11:49写道： > Thanks for your participation! I'll start a vote now. > > Best, > tison. > > > Goson zhang 于2022年8月24日周三 09:40写道： > >> +1 (non-binding), good luck! >> >>

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Thanks for your participation! I'll start a vote now. Best, tison. Goson zhang 于2022年8月24日周三 09:40写道： > +1 (non-binding), good luck! > > david zollo 于2022年8月23日周二 23:20写道： > > > if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved. > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > --- > > Apache

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

+1 (non-binding), good luck! david zollo 于2022年8月23日周二 23:20写道： > if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved. > > > > Best Regards > > --- > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC > David > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved. Best Regards --- Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC David Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo Twitter: @WorkflowEasy --- On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:55 PM

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

related notes: 1. StreamPark is my learning project in the early stage, Not a company-led project and No company employees are involved 2. StreamPark is open-sourced on GitHub on my behalf, no company is associated with it 3. I contacted the initial committers and contributors, they are all happy

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

I want to know about how do you understand no organization? If you work for a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? Best Regards --- Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC & Apache Incubator Mentor David Linkedin:

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

+1 (non-binding) Glad to see StreamPark join the incubator,StreamPark is a good project name,hope it can be a very diversity and heathy community. tison 于2022年8月17日周三 09:15写道： > Hi all, > > I would like to propose StreamPark[1] as a new apache incubator project, > you can find the proposal[2]

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

> > Hi Craig, > > Thanks for your feedback, It's updated in the proposal. Pick here: > > [Huajie Wang](https://github.com/wolfboys) [benj...@apache.org] > [Linying Yu](https://github.com/Al-assad) [assad@outlook.com] > [Yang Zhou](https://github.com/xinzhuxiansheng) [ >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Tison, It's good to have the github ids and email addresses listed in the proposal, but the initial committers' public names should be listed in the proposal. For example: Huajie Wang (https://github.com/wolfboys ) [benj...@apache.org

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Chris, I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose slogan writes: > A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams. Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not specifically

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Thanks for the update. My <1> - <5> should have been resolved. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 tison 于2022年8月19日周五 09:40写道： > > > Add words about you have checked with major contributors > > Added words in the "Initial Committers" section based on @benjobs's comment. > > Best, > tison. > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

s://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > From: Kelu Tao > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 4:39:28 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark > > +1 (non-binding) > > Look forward to see StreamPark in Apache "

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Chris Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: Kelu Tao Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 4:39:28 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Pr

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Thanks for your guidance, All copyrighy fixed. Best, benjobs. Sheng Wu 于2022年8月19日周五 08:54写道： > Thanks for updating. I recommend to > 1. Fix headers > 2. List initial committers with their GitHub accounts. > 3. Add words about you have checked with major contributors, only the > listed ppl

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

> Add words about you have checked with major contributors Added words in the "Initial Committers" section based on @benjobs's comment. Best, tison. tison 于2022年8月19日周五 08:59写道： > FYI, > > > 2. List initial committers with their GitHub accounts. > > It's updated in the proposal. Pick here: >

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

FYI, > 2. List initial committers with their GitHub accounts. It's updated in the proposal. Pick here: * [benjobs](https://github.com/wolfboys) [benj...@apache.org] * [Al-assad](https://github.com/Al-assad) [assad@outlook.com] * [xinzhuxiansheng](https://github.com/xinzhuxiansheng) [

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Thanks for updating. I recommend to 1. Fix headers 2. List initial committers with their GitHub accounts. 3. Add words about you have checked with major contributors, only the listed ppl want to join the initial committer team, if you don't have an open discussion(You just mentioned you asked, so

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi, Sheng. I'm benjobs the author of the StreamPark project. about the questions you mentioned: 1. Copyright statement problem, we will fix it. 2. About the initial committer: Currently there are 59 contributors. I have tried to contact these 59 contributors. At present, only the 7 contributors

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

+1 (non-binding) Look forward to see StreamPark in Apache "Park" :) Best wishes, Kelu On 2022/08/17 01:13:14 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose StreamPark[1] as a new apache incubator project, > you can find the proposal[2] of StreamPark for more detail. > > StreamPark is a

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Sheng Wu 于2022年8月18日周四 22:15写道： > > Several questions > > 1. Many source codes in the repository declare `Licensed to the Apache > Software Foundation (ASF)`[1], which is wrong. As an out-of-foundation > project, `licensed to the ASF`. Could you correct this? > The correct header should be like

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Several questions 1. Many source codes in the repository declare `Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)`[1], which is wrong. As an out-of-foundation project, `licensed to the ASF`. Could you correct this? The correct header should be like this ``` /* * Copyright 2018 x * *

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

+1 (non-binding) StreamPark is a very great project. I have used it for a long time. tison 于2022年8月18日周四 21:15写道： > > Thanks for your feedback! I'm going to keep the discussion for a while and > start a vote the next week. > > Best, > tison. > > > Mingyu Chen 于2022年8月18日周四 20:23写道： > > > +1

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Thanks for your feedback! I'm going to keep the discussion for a while and start a vote the next week. Best, tison. Mingyu Chen 于2022年8月18日周四 20:23写道： > +1 (non-binding) > Good to see StreamPark to join the Incubator. > > > > > -- > > 此致！Best Regards > 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > > Email: >

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

+1 (non-binding) Good to see StreamPark to join the Incubator. -- 此致！Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: morning...@apache.org 在 2022-08-18 15:27:26，"Jark Wu" 写道： >+1 (non-binding) > >StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! > >Best, >Jark Wu > >On 2022/08/18 01:50:10 Willem Jiang

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

+1 (non-binding) StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! Best, Jark Wu On 2022/08/18 01:50:10 Willem Jiang wrote: > It's my pleasure to be the mentor of StreamPark. > Please check out the proposal in the incubator wiki page and give your > feedback. > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

It's my pleasure to be the mentor of StreamPark. Please check out the proposal in the incubator wiki page and give your feedback. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:05 AM tison wrote: > > I follow a previous proposal (Kvrocks) to send a digest to

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

I follow a previous proposal (Kvrocks) to send a digest to general@ while linking the complete proposal to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal >_< Best, tison. tison 于2022年8月17日周三 10:34写道： > Hi Sheng, > > Thanks for your comments. I write the proposal

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Sheng, Thanks for your comments. I write the proposal just following the template. Please specify exactly which section is in the wrong format or missing. Best, tison. Sheng Wu 于2022年8月17日周三 10:26写道： > Hi, > > Could you reformat this proposal to follow the proposal template? There is >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi, Could you reformat this proposal to follow the proposal template? There is something like project owner, dependencies, initial committers, experienced developers etc. are not clear right now. tison 于2022年8月17日 周三09:15写道： > Hi all, > > I would like to propose StreamPark[1] as a new apache

[DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi all, I would like to propose StreamPark[1] as a new apache incubator project, you can find the proposal[2] of StreamPark for more detail. StreamPark is a streaming application development platform. Aimed at ease building and managing streaming applications, StreamPark provides scaffolding for