Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-25 Thread John D. Ament
Having the original author on board and an SGA from them would basically lift any concerns I had. So I'm wondering, are you guys ready to vote? John On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:47 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2016, at 4:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > I would recommend docu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-25 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 1:19 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Having the original author on board and an SGA from them would basically > lift any concerns I had. > > So I'm wondering, are you guys ready to vote? I believe so. I think all of the questions and concerns have been addressed. I’ll start

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-25 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 4:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > I would recommend documenting whatever decisions you make and having > them ratified by the Incubator PMC to make them acts of the ASF. > > The best might be to add a section to the podling proposal describing > how the incoming c

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-25 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > And just to make sure you guys saw it, there was a (what I would consider) > positive response from Legal: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-248 ... I would recommend documenting whatever decisions you make and having them ratifi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-24 Thread John D. Ament
And just to make sure you guys saw it, there was a (what I would consider) positive response from Legal: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-248 John On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:56 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:39 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > Otherwise there a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-24 Thread Pierre Smits
HI All, With helping this proposal achieving a favourable outcome, may I suggest to do some - albeit subtle (we don't it to be regarded as spam) - promotion addressed at the Apache Spark community. Spark is AKKA based, and AKKA is a heavy Gossip user. Maybe some promotion targeted at the AKKa comm

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-22 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:39 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > Otherwise there also could also be issues with the name Apache Gossip of > the original "lives on", so you would have to be prepared to change the > name, if needed. I don’t think we’d have issues with the original authors, as Edward

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread Edward Capriolo
ndeed! > > > Regardless, this does not block a VOTE on proposing Gossip for the > Incubator. It is something which may resolve itself at a later date. I > would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip incubating > community comes to it. > > I'll look forward to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
not block a VOTE on proposing Gossip for the >>>> Incubator. It is something which may resolve itself at a later date. I >>>> would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip incubating >>>> community comes to it. >>>> >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread John D. Ament
> > Incubator. It is something which may resolve itself at a later date. I > >> > would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip > incubating > >> > community comes to it. > >> > > >> > I'll look forward to the Champion o

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread Sean Busbey
t; would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip incubating >> > community comes to it. >> > >> > I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread. >> > Thanks >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, < >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread Edward Capriolo
> incubating > > > community comes to it. > > > > > > I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread. > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, < > > general-digest-h...@incubator.apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread John D. Ament
t a later date. I > > would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip incubating > > community comes to it. > > > > I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread. > > Thanks > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, < > general-

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-20 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
d when the Gossip incubating > community comes to it. > > I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread. > Thanks > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, > > wrote: > > > From: Roman Shaposhnik > > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" &

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-20 Thread Taylor Goetz
o it. > > I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread. > Thanks > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, > > wrote: > > > From: Roman Shaposhnik > > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > > Cc: > > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 201

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-20 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
hen the Gossip incubating community comes to it. I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread. Thanks On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, wrote: > From: Roman Shaposhnik > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Cc: > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:25:43 -0700 &

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-19 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:55 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be > expected prior to importing into an ASF repo. That's the usual protocol. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubs

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-19 Thread John D. Ament
I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be expected prior to importing into an ASF repo. John On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:28 AM Edward Capriolo wrote: > "One question I have, just because the googlecode shutdown is pretty > confusing. Was this development originally fr

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-19 Thread Edward Capriolo
"One question I have, just because the googlecode shutdown is pretty confusing. Was this development originally from this group (e.g. was it originally Edward Capriolo?) or was it someone else that may need to pursue a SGA from?" Good question. The development was not originally from this group.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-18 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > In the Quickstep proposal, Roman explicitly listed himself as both Champion > and Mentor. > I think that is a good model to follow. If someone lists themselves only as > Champion would > I assume that their responsibilities end shortly after

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-18 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Thanks Julian, I updated the proposal to be more explicit regarding my intentions to act as a mentor as well. -Taylor > On Apr 18, 2016, at 8:59 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > In the Quickstep proposal, Roman explicitly listed himself as both Champion > and Mentor. I think that is a good model to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-18 Thread John D. Ament
Looking at the list, we typically target 3 mentors. I see that already on this proposal, so I'm not sure that more are needed. Plus its only 5 committers, so its a good balance. It also helps that many are already familiar with the ASF and the champion is already considering himself in the commi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-18 Thread Julian Hyde
In the Quickstep proposal, Roman explicitly listed himself as both Champion and Mentor. I think that is a good model to follow. If someone lists themselves only as Champion would I assume that their responsibilities end shortly after incubation starts. To use the “it takes a village” metaphor,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-18 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Thanks for the input Henry! I've seen proposals in the past come with what seems like a fully-baked list of mentors, and others with a short list that could obviously benefit from having more mentors and are looking for volunteers. I think Gossip falls into the latter category and would welcome

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-18 Thread Henry Saputra
I would recommend getting more mentors to help. Especially almost half of initial committers are not from Apache and the other half seemed very busy with other projects. - Henry On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:42 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Bump. > > Are there any further comments/questions on the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-18 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Bump. Are there any further comments/questions on the proposal? Or should we proceed with a VOTE? -Taylor > On Apr 13, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > > Hello all, > > I would like to open up a discussion on the following proposal: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GossipPropos

[PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-13 Thread Edward Capriolo
Hello all, I would like to open up a discussion on the following proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GossipProposal Besides those mentioned in the proposal, thank you to Jake Ferrel, Lewis McGibbne, and Nate McCall who were a tremendous help! A copy of the proposal is below: = Abstract