[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

This vote passes with 4 binding +1s and 6 no-binding +1s, no 0 or -1 votes: +1 Julian Hyde (binding) +1 Henry Saputra (binding) +1 Taylor Goetz (binding) +1 Justin Mclean (binding) +1 Luke Han +1 Li Yang +1 Hongbin Ma +1 Qiaohao Zhou +1 Samant, Medha +1 Shaofeng Shi Thanks everyone. We’ll now

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Thanks Justin and everyone! I will send out the vote result soon; 2015-10-23 13:38 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > > Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate? > > You can release it without me changing my vote, there are no veto on > releases. > > But

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Jason, You need to update the LICENSE file for Kylin to include the one for AdminLTE. I will reopen the JIRA to reflect this. - Henry On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> But this should not a block issue for release. > > My +0 doesn’t block

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi, > But this should not a block issue for release. My +0 doesn’t block the release, you only need 3 +1 votes. Normally I would of asked to fix in next release and probably voted +1 as it’s likely they are Apache comparable licences, but this issue has occurred before and there's a vote on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

HI, > You need to update the LICENSE file for Kylin to include the one for AdminLTE. The files in question are not part of AdminLTE [1] that I can see. Even if they were they would have different copyright owners and a different LICENCE to AdminLTE. An educated guess is that they are the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Thanks Justin, Will raise another thread to continue discuss this. Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate? Thanks. 发自我的 iPhone > 在 2015年10月23日，12:56，Justin Mclean 写道： > > Hi, > >> So my question is: Which license should to be declare in downstream

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi, > So my question is: Which license should to be declare in downstream of > Google Fonts? INAL you may want to ask for clarification on legal discuss. I would go with what is in the metadata of the font file as it usually contains the copyright holder and the licensing information, but I’d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi Justin, JIRA has been reopened and added information about license. Also added Google Fonts and Source Sans Pro license information in Apache Kylin's LICENSE file. It looks like Google Fonts included Source Sans Pro, and has it's own license agreement, suppose Google

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi, > Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate? You can release it without me changing my vote, there are no veto on releases. But as you asked and it's been dealt with my vote is +1 (binding). Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

+1 (binding) Checked sigs license headers, NOTICE, LICENSE, etc. All look good. -Taylor > On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:42 PM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > > Hi all, > > The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi, It’s +0 (binding) from me. I checked: - release name includes incubating - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is OK, but probably missing font license - NOTICE all good - All source files have apache headers (a few test files and data files don’t) - A couple of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi IPMC, We would like to have more vote from IPMC members to help on this release candidate. Thank you very much. Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Signature file look good > Hash

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi all, about the font license Kylin UI is build with AdminLTE[1] AdminLTE license here[2] AdminLTE use google webfonts, you can see it at first line here[3] due to firewall issue,some places like CHINA may not be able to access this file.so we download it to local file

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Thanks Jason to check these.We should add in notice/disclaim files about this(AdminLTE already be mentioned there) But this should not a block issue for release. Hi Justin, would you mind to check and vote again? Thank you very much. Regards! Luke Han On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:29 PM -0700,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

+1 mvn test passed hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道： > +1 > > unit test passed on my CI > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Checksum is correct. > > > > Unit test passed on java version "1.7.0_71", OpenJDK Runtime

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

+1 > On Oct 19, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Forwarding my vote from the dev list: > > +1 (binding) > >> On Oct 19, 2015, at 1:18 AM, 周千昊 wrote: >> >> +1 >> mvn test passed >> >> hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道： >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Forwarding my vote from the dev list: +1 (binding) > On Oct 19, 2015, at 1:18 AM, 周千昊 wrote: > > +1 > mvn test passed > > hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道： > >> +1 >> >> unit test passed on my CI >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Signature file look good Hash files look good LICENSE and DISCLAIMER exist No 3rd party exes found in source artifacts +1 (binding) - Henry On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:42 PM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

+1 unit test passed on my CI On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang wrote: > +1 > > Checksum is correct. > > Unit test passed on java version "1.7.0_71", OpenJDK Runtime Environment > (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-x86_64 u71-b14) > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Luke Han

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

+1 Checksum is correct. Unit test passed on java version "1.7.0_71", OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-x86_64 u71-b14) On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Luke Han wrote: > +1 > > MD5 & SHA1 checksum verified > License files are all there > > Unit Test passed > >

[VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi all, The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating. Proposal:http://s.apache.org/Jzu Vote result: 7 binding +1 votes 6 non-binding +1 votes No -1 voteshttp://s.apache.org/kylin-1.1-result_rc1 The commit to be voted

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

+1 MD5 & SHA1 checksum verified License files are all there Unit Test passed Best Regards! - Luke Han On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:42 AM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release >