Ok, I have an RC2 ready to go with very minor changes, will kick off [only]
a general@ vote and tell dev@ & PPMC they can vote on general@
Max
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:44 AM Julian Feinauer <
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Alan that its really minor but as the sign
Hi,
I agree with Alan that its really minor but as the signatures will change I
would prefer another Vote to have this checked.
If you (as Justin suggests) state your changes clearly in the thread I think
everybody will easily carry over the vote from the previous thread so its just
about waiti
I would call a revote over that, it's not like you're changing anything of
import. I'd just regen the package with the change, create the new hash,
and let everyone know. I don't see any reason to drag back through the
voting process on two lists over this.
Alan.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:43 P
Hi Justin,
> On Aug 21, 2019, at 10:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
...
>> Oh, mentors, quick question about the [RESULT] post, do I account for both
>> threads (dev@+general@) in it, or just the general@ one?
>
> Just the IPMC votes.
My understanding of best practice is to combine vote
Hi,
> Oh here's something. Somewhere inside the source release I have a version
> string that says "0.34.0rc1" and that now I'm realizing should really say
> "0.34.0" as it becomes an official release. Now changing that string will
> make for a different SHA.
That's a bit awkward. It would be bes
Hi,
> since these issues seems non-blocking (given your +1) the fixes won't make
> 0.34.0 which
> looks like it is good to go.
That’s fine.
> I couldn't get a clear read on the monokai theme's license either, I'll see
> with Erik who introduced these line whether we can just remove the lines.
Oh here's something. Somewhere inside the source release I have a version
string that says "0.34.0rc1" and that now I'm realizing should really say
"0.34.0" as it becomes an official release. Now changing that string will
make for a different SHA.
How should I go about this?
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019
Dear community,
I'm happy to announce that the vote passes with 9 * +1 votes (7 binding, 2
non-binding)
*+1 votes*
* Justin Mclean (binding)
* Jim Jagielski (binding)
* Julian Feinauer (binding)
* Alan Gates (binding)
* Abhishek Sharma (binding)
* Jakob Homan (binding)
* Furkan Kamaci (binding)
*
Thanks Justin, I just addressed 1,2 and 3 here
https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/pull/8087, but since these
issues seems non-blocking (given your +1) the fixes won't make 0.34.0 which
looks like it is good to go.
I couldn't get a clear read on the monokai theme's license either, I'll se
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes fine
- DISCLAIMER exists, although you may want to use the DISCLAIMER_WIP [8]
- LICENSE is probably missing a few things (se below)
- NOTICE is fine
- No unexpected binary files
- I didn’t check compiling from source
LiCENS
+!
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:20 AM Jeff Feng wrote:
> This is very exciting. Thanks Max!
>
> +1 Binding
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 6:36 AM Julian Feinauer <
> j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > as it seems like the PPMC vote is already closed I'll repost my vote
> > here.
Hi,
+1 from me.
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- Disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Code compiles
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:32 PM Jakob Homan wrote:
> Carrying my binding +1 forward from the Poding vote.
> -Jakob
>
>
Carrying my binding +1 forward from the Poding vote.
-Jakob
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:01 AM Abhishek Sharma
wrote:
>
> +1, Binding.
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:28 PM Bolke de Bruin wrote:
>
> > +1, non-binding
> >
> > Awesome! (And Do i need to say finally? ;-))
> >
> > B.
> >
> > Verstuurd v
+1, Binding.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:28 PM Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> +1, non-binding
>
> Awesome! (And Do i need to say finally? ;-))
>
> B.
>
> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>
> > Op 19 aug. 2019 om 18:05 heeft Alan Gates het
> volgende geschreven:
> >
> > Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. I ch
+1, non-binding
Awesome! (And Do i need to say finally? ;-))
B.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> Op 19 aug. 2019 om 18:05 heeft Alan Gates het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. I checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and
> DISCLAIMER files, as well as looking over the content
Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. I checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and
DISCLAIMER files, as well as looking over the contents of the release for
licenses and to make sure there weren't any binary files (beyond image
files).
Alan.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:41 PM Maxime Beauchemin <
maximebeauche.
This is very exciting. Thanks Max!
+1 Binding
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 6:36 AM Julian Feinauer <
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as it seems like the PPMC vote is already closed I'll repost my vote
> here...
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - Checked out release
> - Verified hash
Hi,
as it seems like the PPMC vote is already closed I'll repost my vote here...
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- Checked out release
- Verified hashes
- Verified incubating in names
- No binaries in release
- Checked NOTICE and LICENSE.txt, README
- Started superset from sources using ` docker-compose
+1 (binding)
> On Aug 19, 2019, at 12:41 AM, Maxime Beauchemin
> wrote:
>
> Hi IPMC,
>
> The Apache Superset community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release
> Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 (rc1). *This would be the first Apache
> release of Superset.*
>
> We now kindly reque
Hi IPMC,
The Apache Superset community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release
Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 (rc1). *This would be the first Apache
release of Superset.*
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Apache Superset (incu
20 matches
Mail list logo
