Since Java-Apache has apparently never actually been charted by the
ASF, why not ask the board go ahead and charter it like the recent PMCs
for PHP, Perl, and TCL, e.g.
" ... the Apache Java Committee be and hereby is responsible for the
creation and maintenance of software related to the Java
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/2001 at 11:26 AM Delagrange, Morgan wrote:
Right, but the Jakarta PMC chairman objects to that
definition.
I'm not sure if Sam Ruby has actually "objected" or
not. It is evident
that Roy Fielding has objected to the scope of the
Jakarta
At 16:01 06.02.2001 -0500, you wrote:
On 2/6/2001 at 9:13 PM Ceki Glc wrote:
What would be gained by refining the charter of Jakarta and pruning
projects?
Roy Fielding has indicated that some action is necessary. His two
suggestions were to either ask the board to create additional PMCs, or
to
http://java.sun.com/features/2001/02/launch.html
http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20010205S0031
This makes me sad.
This just solidifies the fact that all Sun is trying to do is copy M$ and
not actually innovate anything because JSP is nothing better than a Java
version of ASP. Come on guys,
on 2/6/01 5:04 PM, "Ted Husted" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't quite get why this is such an issue. The efficiency of a
pool comes from sharing connections that use the same login to the same
database. It would be likely that Jetspeed, Turbine, and Struts may all
want to connect to
At 11:54 6/2/01 -0800, James Duncan Davidson wrote:
On 2/2/01 12:56 PM, "Peter Donald" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider the case of select() style functionality - why has not that been
added. It's not because it isn't portable, nor is it because it is
technically
hard or a design challenge.
Didn't Sun announce StarPortal first?
There were definitely a lot of cosmetic similarities between ASP and
JSP when it was first introduced. But Sun did get the important thing
right: JSPs are just another way to write servlets, and have full
access to the Java language.
Meanwhile, I do agree
Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Conclusion ?? (it should be obvious).
Conclusion: They pay my salary, and make me happy... If you want a select()
call, it's as easy as 1...2...3... to write it using JNI...
Pier :)
hi,
At 02:06 2/2/01 -0800, Jon Stevens wrote:
Then you should be suggesting another top level project be created instead
of creating a pseudo project that is half within Avalon and half within the
top level namespace.
Just like there is for Jetspeed.
No one else commented on this from PMC so
