I echo Andrew's reservations. The reasons behind the restriction of
LGPLed imports are unclear and apparently undocumented. Such a crucial
matter deserves to be properly documented. If the restriction cannot
be justified, then it should be lifted.
I urge all Apache members and committers to
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
I echo Andrew's reservations. The reasons behind the restriction of
LGPLed imports are unclear and apparently undocumented. Such a crucial
matter deserves to be properly documented. If the restriction cannot
be justified, then it should be lifted.
You have that backwards.
At 07:21 12.02.2003 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
LGPL has special rules for 'link'. What exactly is the concept of a
'link' in Java? If A imports B and A and B are not in the same Java
package (but perhaps share some similar names in the first three
qualifiers) are they in the same 'library' or
The true question will be whether they plan to enfore the patents. Which, looking at
their track
record and anti-open source position, seems likely.
--- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Surprise surprise...
http://www.javalobby.org/thread.jsp?forum=61thread=6843
--
No, it is not up to the ASF. However, has the ASF attempted to clarify
the matter with the FSF? Why not ask the FSF if importing java classes
is considered as derivative work or simply as work that uses the
library?
In the absence of a clear response from the FSF, there is no doubt that
it
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 07:21 12.02.2003 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
LGPL has special rules for 'link'. What exactly is the concept of a
'link' in Java? If A imports B and A and B are not in the same Java
package (but perhaps share some similar names in the first three
qualifiers) are they in the
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
No, it is not up to the ASF. However, has the ASF attempted to clarify
the matter with the FSF? Why not ask the FSF if importing java classes
is considered as derivative work or simply as work that uses the
library?
In the absence of a clear response from the FSF,
I will do this as well. Thanks.
-Andy
A better approach would be to send the e-mail to
http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/
-Andy
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Jakarta Newsletter
==
Issue: 7
Date: January 2003
Url: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/200301.html
The month has been quite busy for apache folks, with new apache
projects, new jakarta subprojects and talk of even more. And to reassure
you that the code is also coming along
Jakarta Newsletter
==
Issue: 7
Date: January 2003
Url: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/200301.html
The month has been quite busy for apache folks, with new apache
projects, new jakarta subprojects and talk of even more. And to reassure
you that the code is also coming along
This does look to be a february item... I'm inclined to hang onto it for
next time but if people disagree then we can whack it in.
Thanks,
Rob
Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], robert burr
ell donkin writes:
(here's some bits and pieces from the commons.)
Jakarta
Thank you Robert,
DRAFT2 is the best answer to M$ patenting policy!!!
Regards
Xavier
XP -Message d'origine-
XP De : Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
XP Envoye : mercredi 12 fevrier 2003 14:37
XP A : Jakarta General List
XP Objet : Re: Microsoft attempts to patent .NET
XP
XP
HI Folks
I was at apachecon ! I'm hoping to have a chat with anyone who runs CVS
for 50+ developers in a fast moving environment. I'm looking for some
very basic pointers on whether we should implement it or not. Also might
be in the market for some consultancy if anyone is based in the UK.
No, it is not up to the ASF. However, has the ASF attempted to clarify the
matter with the FSF? Why not ask the FSF if importing java classes is
considered as derivative work or simply as work that uses the library?
It doesn't really matter. There are restrictions imposed on a 'work that
on 2003/2/12 8:55 AM, neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was at apachecon ! I'm hoping to have a chat with anyone who runs CVS
for 50+ developers in a fast moving environment. I'm looking for some
very basic pointers on whether we should implement it or not. Also might
be in the market for some
-Original Message-
From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
on 2003/2/12 8:55 AM, neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was at apachecon ! I'm hoping to have a chat with anyone who runs CVS
for 50+ developers in a fast moving environment. I'm looking for some
very basic
Could someone grant me karma to jakarta-site2?
I want to alter the mailing list details for the projects that have moved to
db.apache.org.
Thanks in advance,
Scott
--
Scott Eade
Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd.
http://www.backstagetech.com.au
.Mac Chat/AIM: seade at mac dot com
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 01:06:28PM +0100, Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
Surprise surprise...
http://www.javalobby.org/thread.jsp?forum=61thread=6843
Does this surprise anybody ;)?
M$ is the reason why I did not have intensively dealt with .NET - even it
might be a good technology...
But
[I'm sending this here, because I'm hoping someone is interested in
giving a presentation about Jakarta]
CALL FOR PAPERS
NLUUG Spring conference 2003
WEB APPLICATIONS
Zen and the art of internet
19 matches
Mail list logo
