Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS

2003-12-06 Thread Costin Manolache
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 20:43, Daniel Rall wrote: > >> Given Robert's description of his experience with the Incubator, I'm for >> the Jakarta Commons to gather some community (direct drop rather than >> sandbox route), with the goal of an eventual promotion to a ful

Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS

2003-12-06 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
You're kind of being excessively abrasive especially given that I'm just trying to understand the problem as a responsible PMC member. Given that I'm trying to find out about the subject despite having no ties to Turbine or JCS, I'd expect a little less of an obnoxious response. This post certain

Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS

2003-12-06 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 12/5/03 2:45 AM, "Martin Poeschl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > >> So far it sounds to me like JCS is only used by Turbine and that only the >> Turbiners really care about it. >> > it is indirectly used by turbine ... that's why the discussion started ... > it is used

Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS

2003-12-06 Thread Raymond Racine
With regard to who is using JCS (or should!). We use it at http://www.officedepot.com Without it I doubt we would be ranked where we are on http://www.ecommercetimes.com/ectpi/ We added a new persisting backend based on an all Java version of gdbm. I found that in a very old version of w3c's Jig