Re: [PROPOSAL] As it ever were (draft 2)

2003-12-25 Thread Ted Husted
[PROPOSAL] As it ever were I've incorporated many of the suggestions made on the list and prepared another draft for community review. -ISSUE- The ASF Board has indicated that it does not believe that the Jakarta PMC, in its present form, is capable of providing oversight of all the subprojects

RE: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

2003-12-25 Thread Gary Gregory
-Original Message- From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 17:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release [X] +1 I approve the release of jakarta-oro version 2.0.8. [

Re: [PROPOSAL] As it ever were

2003-12-25 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Dec 24, 2003, at 12:11 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: Ted, I think we must focus on what we agree on - it seems nobody is against expanding the PMC to include most committers ( or all active committers who don't decline ). I'm not sure I understand Geir's current position, but I think he still

Re: [PROPOSAL] As it ever were

2003-12-25 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Exactly - lets not overdo this with too much process. Lets just get people who have genuine interest onto the PMC, covering the project(s) they work on, and then keep growing. geir On Dec 24, 2003, at 2:46 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: Post a list of projects and get PMC people to volunteer to

Re: java@apache

2003-12-25 Thread J.Pietschmann
Noel J. Bergman wrote: This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a project, providing its name, resource (www, scm, wiki, etc.) locations, ontological classifications, etc., I imagine that could be useful in producing a portal. Sounds awfully close to a Maven

RE: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

2003-12-25 Thread Gary Gregory
Ah, no, sorry, I was quoting my state as a PMC member from the last message I saw my name in. Actually, I am now wondering if my voting was even appropriate. I would guess not since I am an ORO user, not a developer, perhaps a +0 would be better. I am not sure. Gary -Original Message-

Re: java@apache

2003-12-25 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, J.Pietschmann wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a project, providing its name, resource (www, scm, wiki, etc.) locations, ontological classifications, etc., I imagine that could be useful in

Ontology-based portals - RDF, LDAP, Xindice (was: java@apache)

2003-12-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
J.Pietschmann wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a project, providing its name, resource (www, scm, wiki, etc.) locations, ontological classifications, etc., I imagine that could be useful in producing a portal. Sounds