Re: Mailman for Jakarta/Apache?

2002-04-10 Thread James Duncan Davidson
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 05:00 , Andrew C. Oliver wrote: My only question starts with a P. With the amount of volume Jakarta a/o Apache gets, can Mailman hold up? (I've no idea, I'm asking)... If so, then god yes... I'm too stupid to remember the syntax of those commands and have to

Ant won JavaWorld Editor's Award

2002-03-26 Thread James Duncan Davidson
of JavaOne. |* x180:james duncan davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *| |* http://www.x180.net/ !try; do() *| -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

JavaOne Tuesday Keynote

2002-03-26 Thread James Duncan Davidson
) |* x180:james duncan davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *| |* http://www.x180.net/ !try; do() *| -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation

2002-03-22 Thread James Duncan Davidson
and not lawyers (whose job it is to ensure that nothing changes). |* x180:james duncan davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *| |* http://www.x180.net/ !try; do() *| -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto

Re: JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation

2002-03-22 Thread James Duncan Davidson
), but hopefully the next spec of J2EE will be. If these changes are made to the JSPA as promised, the next versions of both EE and SE will be included. |* x180:james duncan davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *| |* http://www.x180.net/ !try; do

Re: Jakarta is not an open source project in the pure communitysens e anymore

2002-03-22 Thread James Duncan Davidson
the JCP just lead a charge up the hill to get the progress that we did and the changes from Sun to the JSPA that are coming. Yeah, right, we're a bunch of Sun stooges around here. Uh-huh. |* x180:james duncan davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *| |* http://www.x180.net

Re: JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation

2002-03-22 Thread James Duncan Davidson
On 3/22/02 18:49, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can tell you probably don't own a copy of Dr. Strangelove eh? Actually no, I never read it. Darn, I hate missing the inside jokes. :) |* x180:james duncan davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *| |* http://www.x180

Re: StudioZ (was: Re: JakartaOne?)

2002-03-05 Thread James Duncan Davidson
On 3/4/02 11:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yea right ! You liar :-) Sounds too cool to be true :-) Of course this should be an all night session. Definitely an all-nighter. :) .:..:.:.:::.:::...:..:::.::.::...:::x180:james duncan davidson -- To unsubscribe

Re: Java is dead... but it could still be saved!

2002-02-25 Thread James Duncan Davidson
. Gosh, I think I'll have to write my own programming platform one day to avoid all this. Heh. :) .:..:.:.:::.:::...:..:::.::.::...:::x180:james duncan davidson -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java is dead... but it could still be saved!

2002-02-25 Thread James Duncan Davidson
On 2/24/02 13:45, Micael Padraig Og mac Grene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you really thing that C# is going to be a competitor to Java? That amazes me. Do you guys work for Microsoft? Troll. .:..:.:.:::.:::...:..:::.::.::...:::x180:james duncan davidson -- To unsubscribe, e

Re: Java is dead... but it could still be saved!

2002-02-23 Thread James Duncan Davidson
that you'd be saying something like this about June of 2002. sigh You're right you know. Stay flexible. Go with the flow. Sometimes it's not worth fighting all the battles at once. .:..:.:.:::.:::...:..:::.::.::...:::x180:james duncan davidson -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto

Re: is a statement of the license in all source files?

2001-12-28 Thread James Duncan Davidson
it. |* x180:james duncan davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *| |* http://www.x180.net/ !try; do() *| -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Coding style addition

2001-12-16 Thread James Duncan Davidson
projects as well. |* x180:james duncan davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *| |* http://www.x180.net/ !try; do() *| -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Scope

2001-07-30 Thread James Duncan Davidson
again. As one of the originators of this recent Scope blow up -- I wasn't raising topic of Ant... If anything I thought I put a big enough but that's what I think and you are fine to keep ignoring it disclaimer on it. :) James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] !try; do

Re: Nominations for the Jakata PMC - roll call

2001-02-28 Thread James Duncan Davidson
on 2/28/01 7:30 AM, Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [-1] Peter Donald [+1] Diane Holt [+0] Ted Husted [+1] Ceki Glc [+0] Geir Magnusson Jr. [+1] Daniel F. Savarese [+0] Jason van Zyl -- James Duncan Davidson http://x180.net/ !try; do

Re: What is Struts? (was: Re: What is Avalon?)

2001-02-28 Thread James Duncan Davidson
already be done. :) .duncan -- James Duncan Davidson http://x180.net/ !try; do(); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [POLL] Re: Code Sharing Concepts

2001-02-21 Thread James Duncan Davidson
on process management rules that include protection from arbitrary API changes. I agree wholeheartedly with this statement. -- James Duncan Davidson http://x180.net/ !try; do

Re: bugs

2001-02-08 Thread James Duncan Davidson
the bug report. The requirement to have the user report bugs twice, once through ABDB and once through a ML is not optimal. Agreed. -- James Duncan Davidson http://x180.net/ !try; do