On 10.11.2011 19:01, Henri Yandell wrote:
> A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to
> close down the PMC.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, because
+1
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr.
... cut ...
> Well, I would like to incorporate the changes in August such that an
> updated (bug-fixed, and the enhancements incorportated) BSF 2.x can then
> be put into the attic.
... cut ...
Another project (a language binding for D-Bus) took too much time, such
that I was not able to turn t
Just a question: saw that BSF 2.4.1 got moved to commons (have checked
>> that out), but not BSF 3.0. Where is BSF 3.0 slated to go to?
>>
> All is in commons somewhere under
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bsf/branches/
>
> Hen literally moved the BSF source tree to
> https:/
Hen,
On 17.08.2011 06:29, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Post the successful vote to move BSF over to Commons, I've moved the
> svn into the Commons tree.
>
> New svn url:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bsf/trunk
>
> Or you can check out all of Commons at:
>
> https://svn.apache.o
On 14.08.2011 21:21, sebb wrote:
> On 7 August 2011 18:11, Rony G. Flatscher
> wrote:
>
>> Looking at activity since the turn of the year, I think it's more
>>
>>>>>> likely that Harmony would be heading to the Attic someday. You never
>&g
Looking at activity since the turn of the year, I think it's more
likely that Harmony would be heading to the Attic someday. You never
know though - needs to be given time to see if things recover (someone
started committing a few patches in July).
I'm in favour of a BSF TL
On 06.08.2011 18:41, sebb wrote:
> On 6 August 2011 08:40, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 24.07.2011 19:08, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun,
On 24.07.2011 19:08, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
> wrote:
>
>> On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
>>
>>>> * BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
>>>>
>>>> A diff
[x] +1, G'night Cactus
On 23.07.2011 20:25, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
> against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
> attic).
>
> [ ] +1, G'night Cactus
> [ ] -1, No because:
>
> There's no activity in the p
[X] -1, No because:
there are outstanding bugs that should be fixed and I would do that, but need
some time ("land-under-water" currently).
---rony
On 24.07.2011 08:27, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
> against something moving to the at
On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
>> * BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
>>
>> A difficult one to decide on. I think we should challenge on it going
>> to the Attic, and if not send it to Commons where it will have more
>> chance of activity.
>>
> Now that JSR-223 is pa
On 6/24/2010 10:52 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:34 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> The Jakarta site still includes Taglibs in the downloads section.
>>
>> OK if I remove all of those now?
>>
>>
>
>
> Not sure. OOH, most of these are retired. OTOH, unlike some of the
> other
On 6/19/2010 5:53 PM, sebb wrote:
> [Third time lucky?]
>
Not luck, expertise !
> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release.
>
> The artifacts are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.1-RC3/
>
> The Maven artifacts are at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/reposit
sebb wrote:
> On 19/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
>> [Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only]
>>
>> This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into
>> one development and one notifications list. For background including
>> timing, anticipated be
sebb wrote:
> Thanks to those who voted so far.
>
> At least two more PMC votes are needed - please!
>
> S///
> On 25/09/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've created what I hope will be JMeter 2.3 final in the directory:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.3/dist
>>
>> Site
... snip ...
> BSF
>
> MvdB :Silent quarter. A talk for Apachecon US was accepted (Rony Flatcher),
> which will hopefully increase the user base (observation : since the user
> list is also pretty quiet it can mean that BSF is bug free or it needs
> more users)
>
... snip ...
Sorry, o
+1
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J Aaron Farr wrote:
... cut ...
> As for dormant code, leave it where it is. If we still have a few
> committers working on it and making releases occasionally, then we'd
> still need a functional PMC. Otherwise, if we get enough noise about
> a subproject, it can be revived (perhaps with help f
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
>
> However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move
> to TLP.
>
>http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
>
> Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't
+1
Scott Eade wrote:
> The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that
> the Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and become their own
> top level project. We are now at the point in the process that calls
> for a vote to take place.
>
> The proposal is available at:
>
Hi S///,
> It mentions setting the Reply-To to private AT jakarta when sending
> the invite - is the private list also the correct place to submit the
> initial proposal?
AFAIK, yes!
> Just in case the proposal fails, I don't want to cause hurt to the
> person by raising the vote on a public maili
+1
Felipe Leme wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to have Petar Tahchiev as a Jakarta Committer.
>
> Petar currently works as software engineer in Bulgaria, but was a MSc
> student last year, when we proposed porting the Cactus build to Maven
> 2 as a "GSOC" (Google Summer of Code) proje
+1
Nathan Bubna wrote:
> The Velocity project has for some time now been making plans for a
> proposal to the board that the Velocity projects leave the Jakarta
> umbrella and become their own top level project. Martin has asked us
> to hold a vote on the proposal here before he passes it along t
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Cool :) Let's do this at dinner, since there are only 2 of us ;)
:)
Would it be possible to have it on Monday or Tuesday or is there another
firm date for BOFs ?
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscri
Vote to remove the SVN barriers within Jakarta such that all jakarta-*
groups are merged into the one jakarta group with the exception of
jakarta-hivemind, jakarta-slide, jakarta-cactus and jakarta-jmeter
under the assumption that they are moving to having their own PMCs.
Tapestry is already
25 matches
Mail list logo
