On 8/18/07, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 13:40 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
Disassociation from the server side.
What is the benefit of that? At any rate in my opinion it is not worth
trouble of rebranding the whole project.
Will the current
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Will the current [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing lists continue to exist alongside [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED], where the Slide WebDAV client finds
a new home?
Yes, as aliases.
Then server-related discussions would end up on the
mailing
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 09:25 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Could you live with HttpComponents being the name of the new TLP? I
would really like to avoid having to come up with a completely new name
for the project.
HttpComponents use the package org.apache.http.
I
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
What's wrong with org.apache.slide for WebDAV components?
If we're not taking over the full Slide codebase,
and if Slide\{WebDAV-client} is not officially
declared dormant in Jakarta, then we'd have two
independent projects using the same namespace.
Since a WebDAV
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 11:49 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
What's wrong with org.apache.slide for WebDAV components?
If we're not taking over the full Slide codebase,
and if Slide\{WebDAV-client} is not officially
declared dormant in Jakarta, then we'd have two
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
If there are no plans to develop non-client bits any further,
That exactly is my concern. I still hope for some more input
from Slide developers.
I personally think WebDAV client should keep Slide as its name.
I could live with that.
Slide is a well established
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 12:21 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
If there are no plans to develop non-client bits any further,
That exactly is my concern. I still hope for some more input
from Slide developers.
I personally think WebDAV client should keep Slide as its
Disassociation from the server side.
What is the benefit of that? At any rate in my opinion it is not worth
trouble of rebranding the whole project.
Will the current [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing lists continue to exist alongside [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 13:40 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
Disassociation from the server side.
What is the benefit of that? At any rate in my opinion it is not worth
trouble of rebranding the whole project.
Will the current [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing lists continue
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
2007/8/10, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
While I would like to get rid of HttpClient 3.x rather
sooner than later, there's no denyig that it will stay
with us for several years to come. From this angle, it
would make sense to move the WebDAV client as it is.
Could you live with HttpComponents being the name of the new TLP? I
would really like to avoid having to come up with a completely new name
for the project. The name is ugly and unwieldy but we have already had a
number of public releases so it is more or less established. If yes,
consider
While I would like to get rid of HttpClient 3.x rather
sooner than later, there's no denyig that it will stay
with us for several years to come. From this angle, it
would make sense to move the WebDAV client as it is.
Maybe that could be the first step.
If there is a reasonable interest of
2007/8/10, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Martin's and
also my hopes had been that when the - indeed useful - WebDAV client
was moved to a different project it could actually be revived. Reasons
are that it is functional, useful and of much less complexity than
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Martin's and
also my hopes had been that when the - indeed useful - WebDAV client
was moved to a different project it could actually be revived. Reasons
are that it is functional, useful and of much less complexity than the
server. I would at least volunteer to
2007/8/6, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Slide seems pretty inactive at the moment. I am just wondering how many
developers out there would be willing to contribute on a more or less
regular basis to the maintenance and further development of Slide, or
the new
2007/8/10, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
While I would like to get rid of HttpClient 3.x rather
sooner than later, there's no denyig that it will stay
with us for several years to come. From this angle, it
would make sense to move the WebDAV client as it is.
Maybe that could be the
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Slide seems pretty inactive at the moment. I am just wondering how many
developers out there would be willing to contribute on a more or less
regular basis to the maintenance and further development of Slide, or
the new TLP will effectively end up tasked with the job
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 18:45 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
Hi all,
...
I've been following the Slide [3] developer list for about two months,
and I've read through their home page. The last release was at the
end of 2004, and development seems to have basically stopped then.
Slide comprises
Hi all,
two months ago, Martin contacted Slide and HttpComponents [1a,1b]
with the idea of joining them into a new Top Level Project (TLP).
The initial response was positive on both sides, and I feel it is
time to get the ball rolling. I'm starting this discussion thread
to establish a common
19 matches
Mail list logo
