On Nov 19, 2007 12:44 AM, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 10:20 AM, Thomas Vandahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense. For example, the
Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB
I would tend to agree with Jim. The commit rights never attached to
Jakarta but only to a specific subproject under the Jakarta
umbrella. There has never been any such thing as a Jakarta committer,
only committers to current and former Jakarta subprojects. Likewise,
there is no such thing as an
On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta excluded.
Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense. For example, the
Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and for
Harmony, to DB and XML! Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive
projects, has no connection to anything else...
I agree with
On 11/16/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta excluded.
If you're interested, there's a
On Nov 18, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 12:07 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta
On Nov 18, 2007 12:07 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
dominating the graphs, so the
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase*
cross-polination (as I understand it)... So yes, since most
committers for most ASF java
On Nov 18, 2007 1:10 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase*
cross-polination (as I
On Nov 18, 2007 1:14 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 1:10 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
Jukka's graph shows
On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase*
I don't think that anyone confused
Jukka is not subsribed, but the reason there are 5 is to kind of limit the size
of the image (1
results in a huge image)
Mvgr,
Martin
Nathan Bubna wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 1:14 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 1:10 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov
On Nov 18, 2007 10:20 AM, Thomas Vandahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense. For example, the
Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and for
Harmony, to DB and XML! Ant, arguably one of the most
Hi,
Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta excluded.
If you're interested, there's a version with Jakarta in it at [2]. :-)
[1]
14 matches
Mail list logo
