On 28 Dec 2004, at 20:43, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:27:51 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
It has problems. Mainly in that it doesn't really provide much a
context
sensitive message. It should be mentioning signatures, keys, md5s
etc. It
also loses the
I'm late to this discussion, so pardon if I'm rehashing something said
earlier.
It would be very advantageous to consider how the ASF Repository factors
into the the download picture. I've been hoping to see some integration
between the contents of dist and those of dist/java-repository. The
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
I think, if we had a standard template for download pages, each
subproject could have its own download page, something like we have
for Struts:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:27:51 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, circling the basement is not conducive to coherence, or correct
spelling I suspect, so I'm going to ramble a bit here in vague
justification. Jakarta is different to other TLP's in that it's an
umbrella. One
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:27:51 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Demo Builds, Milestone Builds: Do we even use these terms regularly? We
have 1 demo build, and I thought we did RC's rather than Milestones. I'm
I thought a milestone
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 08:19:09 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:27:51 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Demo Builds, Milestone Builds: Do we even use these terms regularly? We
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:27:51 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I spent a fair while walking circles in the basement (carrying the unhappy
baby) and thinking on the download pages.
My first thoughts were on what they exist for. From an info-arch point of
view, they are a
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
I think, if we had a standard template for download pages, each
subproject could have its own download page, something like we have
for Struts:
http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi
Agreed, much nicer than the closer.cgi. I'd prefer it if subprojects
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:27:51 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Demo Builds, Milestone Builds: Do we even use these terms regularly? We
have 1 demo build, and I thought we did RC's rather than Milestones. I'm
not sure we even need to
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:23:37 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:27:51 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Demo Builds, Milestone Builds: Do we even use these terms regularly? We
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
I think, if we had a standard template for download pages, each
subproject could have its own download page, something like we have
for Struts:
http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi
Agreed, much nicer than the closer.cgi. I'd prefer
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
I think, if we had a standard template for download pages, each
subproject could have its own download page, something like we have
for Struts:
http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi
Agreed,
12 matches
Mail list logo
