This message was verified by the filtering system of our mail
server.
Original message was replaced by this one by the following
reason :
*** A suspicious file (executable code) was found in the message !
Original message had the following attached files :
(X-FILE ??? ) : word document_
As already noted, several of the FAQ documents include links to copies
of the license. Plus the fact that virtually all Apache projects
include a LICENSE or the like file in an obvious place inside the
project (which you presumably downloaded to see if you wanted to use
it) as well as the fact th
there is a link in the text at the bottom of the front page..
http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 May 2002 15:28
> To: Jakarta General List
> Subject: RE: [IMPORTANT] What acti
Having decided to licence some code under the Apache licence, and some
documentation as well, I headed to the Jakarta front page to find a link
to the licence. No dice. Then I tried the main Apache front page, no luck
again.
Shouldn't these link to the licence? Or the two or three licences in
que
just a bit), and appended with
a rip off of another document from OSS(?).
> -Original Message-
> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:12 AM
> To: Jakarta General List
> Cc: 'Avalon Developer's List'
>
Berin, do you have any pointer/URL for the "stolen" bits? Both ours and the
"illegal" copy... I believe that we can have someone to write to the
offending party and maybe reason with them?
Pier
"Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been informed by someone who felt it was ve
> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:04 AM
> To: 'Jakarta General List'
> Cc: 'Avalon Developer's List'
> Subject: [IMPORTANT] What actions can the ASF take to enforce
> copyright?
>
>
> I have be
I have been informed by someone who felt it was very necessary for them
to
act (they called my home, they sent a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
etc.) about a straight up violation of copyright and plagerism.
The Jakarta documentation in question is the Avalon docs (I think he was
referring to the
