Re: Jakarta-tools ? Re: Code Sharing Concepts

2001-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about starting the "reuse" quest by reusing the jakarta-tools repository ? Wouldn't that break the "old" version of Watchdog ("jakarta-watchdog") that still has dependencies here? At any rate, the process questions need to be settled now (before any of us get

Re: VOTE/PROPOSAL: new commiters for jakarta-tools

2001-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone can ( and should ) vote on those issues, but only jakarta-tools commiter votes will be counted ( for the first one). If the first vote is positive, all commter votes will be counted for the second :-) OK, since you put it formally, I will as well: -1 For

Re: Jakarta-tools ? Re: Code Sharing Concepts

2001-02-09 Thread cmanolache
What about starting the "reuse" quest by reusing the jakarta-tools repository ? Wouldn't that break the "old" version of Watchdog ("jakarta-watchdog") that still has dependencies here? In what way ? By adding new directories and tools the old one shouldn't be affected. Watchdog is using

You make the decision. (Mini-Essay #1)

2001-02-09 Thread Jon Stevens
Hey all, this is just the start of more coverage on why JSP sucks. I will eventually compile these mini-essay's into an essay titled "You make the decision." and publish it on the web somewhere (in other words, I'm collecting information). Key: "" - quotes from the article [] -

Re: Jakarta-tools ? Re: Code Sharing Concepts

2001-02-09 Thread JDiggans
With Java, it's led by Sun who, while far better than most corporate entitites, is not about to lead a charge to organize the world of Free Java Resources. Are you saying that your opinion of Jakarta is that it is lead by Sun? Not at all, I'm saying the direction of the Java language

Re: Jakarta-tools ? Re: Code Sharing Concepts

2001-02-09 Thread JDiggans
Not at all, I'm saying the direction of the Java language (note my sentance did not contain the word 'Jakarta') is lead by Sun, which I do not believe to be in error. - jc It wasn't a question of error. It was simply a question to see if that was your impression at all. :-) Actually to