[PROPOSAL] As it ever were
I've incorporated many of the suggestions made on the list and prepared
another draft for community review.
-ISSUE-
The ASF Board has indicated that it does not believe that the Jakarta
PMC, in its present form, is capable of providing oversight of all the
subprojects u
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 17:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release
>
> [X] +1 I approve the release of jakarta-oro version 2.0
On Dec 24, 2003, at 12:11 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Ted,
I think we must focus on what we agree on - it seems nobody is against
expanding the PMC to include most committers ( or all active
committers who don't decline ).
I'm not sure I understand Geir's current position, but I think he still
Exactly - lets not overdo this with too much process. Lets just get
people who have genuine interest onto the PMC, covering the project(s)
they work on, and then keep growing.
geir
On Dec 24, 2003, at 2:46 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Post a list of projects and get PMC people to volunteer to pos
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a
project, providing its name, resource (www, scm, wiki, etc.) locations,
ontological classifications, etc., I imagine that could be useful in
producing a portal.
Sounds awfully close to a Maven project.xml
Ah, no, sorry, I was quoting my state as a PMC member from the last message
I saw my name in.
Actually, I am now wondering if my voting was even appropriate. I would
guess not since I am an ORO user, not a developer, perhaps a +0 would be
better. I am not sure.
Gary
> -Original Message-
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a
> > project, providing its name, resource (www, scm, wiki, etc.) locations,
> > ontological classifications, etc., I imagine that could be useful in
> >
J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a
> > project, providing its name, resource (www, scm, wiki, etc.) locations,
> > ontological classifications, etc., I imagine that could be useful in
> > producing a portal.
> S