Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
+1 Cheers Jean-Frederic Henri Yandell wrote: Suggested new bylaws are at: http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion (ie: active/inactive projects). Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. === [ ] +1 - let's do it [ ] -1 - not good === I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
> === > [X] +1 - let's do it > [ ] -1 - not good > === > This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Jakarta Wiki] New: JakartaReport-August2004
Date: 2004-08-10T21:47:55 Editor: HenriYandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Jakarta Wiki Page: JakartaReport-August2004 URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaReport-August2004 Starting an August report New Page: == August 2004 == === Status === We are updating the PMC bylaws to bring them back in touch with the current reality. === Releases === * 02 August 2004 - HiveMind 1.0-beta-2 * 02 August 2004 - Commons BeanUtils 1.7 * 01 August 2004 - Commons JXPath 1.2 * 01 August 2004 - Commons HttpClient 2.0.1 === Community changes === * 09 August 2004 - Davide Savazzi (dsavazzi) * 09 August 2004 - Ryan Rhodes (rrhodes) * 31 July 2004 - Daniel Naber (dnaber) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Jakarta Wiki] Updated: JakartaReport
Date: 2004-08-10T21:42:47 Editor: HenriYandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Jakarta Wiki Page: JakartaReport URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaReport Linking August in Change Log: -- @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ * ["JakartaReport-June2004"] * ["JakartaReport-July2004"] * ["JakartaBoardReport-July2004"] + * ["JakartaReport-August2004"] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Jakarta Wiki] Updated: JakartaReport-July2004
Date: 2004-08-10T21:41:46 Editor: HenriYandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Jakarta Wiki Page: JakartaReport-July2004 URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaReport-July2004 Couple of other releases. Change Log: -- @@ -6,15 +6,16 @@ === Releases === - * Commons Codec (coming) + * 26 July 2004 - JK 1.2.6 Released + * 21 July 2004 - Standard Taglibs 1.1.1 and 1.0.6 Released * 15 July 2004 - Tomcat 5.0.27 Stable Released * 03 July 2004 - HiveMind 1.0-beta-1 Released * 03 July 2004 - Commons Betwixt 0.5 Released === Community changes === -Travis Savo joins as a committer (no access yet). -James M. Mason joins as a committer to Slide. +* Travis Savo joins as a committer (no access yet). +* James M. Mason joins as a committer to Slide. === Subproject news === - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
[X] +1 - let's do it Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
+1 Phil Suggested new bylaws are at: http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion (ie: active/inactive projects). Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. === [ ] +1 - let's do it [ ] -1 - not good === I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
+1 Adrian Sutton. On 11/08/2004, at 1:58 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: Suggested new bylaws are at: http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion (ie: active/inactive projects). Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. === [ ] +1 - let's do it [ ] -1 - not good === I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Intencha "tomorrow's technology today" Ph: 38478913 0422236329 Suite 8/29 Oatland Crescent Holland Park West 4121 Australia QLD www.intencha.com PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
> === > [X] +1 - let's do it > [ ] -1 - not good > === - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
+1 Oliver Henri Yandell wrote: Suggested new bylaws are at: http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion (ie: active/inactive projects). Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. === [ ] +1 - let's do it [ ] -1 - not good === I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
+1 On Aug 10, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: Suggested new bylaws are at: http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion (ie: active/inactive projects). Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. === [ ] +1 - let's do it [ ] -1 - not good === I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
+1 Mark > -Original Message- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:59 PM > To: Jakarta General List > Subject: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws > > > Suggested new bylaws are at: > > http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html > > The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan > out a new set > of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, > sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion > (ie: active/inactive projects). > > Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 > majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. > > === > [ ] +1 - let's do it > [ ] -1 - not good > === > > I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there > are others we > could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major > disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be > nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: > [VOTE] Updating > PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. > > Hen > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
+1 Mike Henri Yandell wrote: Suggested new bylaws are at: http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion (ie: active/inactive projects). Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. === [ ] +1 - let's do it [ ] -1 - not good === I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
Hi, >Suggested new bylaws are at: > >http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html > >The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set >of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, >sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion >(ie: active/inactive projects). > >Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 >majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. > >=== >[ X ] +1 - let's do it >[ ] -1 - not good >=== Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
[X] +1 - let's do it Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slight change Was: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
Sounds fine, and not a real change to the vote so I can slip that in. On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Gary Gregory wrote: > Minor tweak under "Membership": I would switch the 2 paragraphs such > that the voting-new-members-in bit comes before the "I'm outta here > bit". Makes the item more positive methinks. > > Gary > > > -Original Message- > > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 08:59 > > To: Jakarta General List > > Subject: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws > > > > > > Suggested new bylaws are at: > > > > http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html > > > > The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new > set > > of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, > > sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion > > (ie: active/inactive projects). > > > > Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 > > majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. > > > > === > > [ ] +1 - let's do it > > [ ] -1 - not good > > === > > > > I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others > we > > could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major > > disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be > > nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: [VOTE] > Updating > > PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. > > > > Hen > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
Minor tweak under "Membership": I would switch the 2 paragraphs such that the voting-new-members-in bit comes before the "I'm outta here bit". Makes the item more positive methinks. Gary > -Original Message- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 08:59 > To: Jakarta General List > Subject: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws > > > Suggested new bylaws are at: > > http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html > > The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set > of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, > sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion > (ie: active/inactive projects). > > Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 > majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. > > === > [ ] +1 - let's do it > [ ] -1 - not good > === > > I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we > could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major > disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be > nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: [VOTE] Updating > PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. > > Hen > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
+1 On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 21:28, Henri Yandell wrote: > Suggested new bylaws are at: > > http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html > ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
Suggested new bylaws are at: http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments, sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion (ie: active/inactive projects). Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday. === [ ] +1 - let's do it [ ] -1 - not good === I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be nice if they could change the subject (ie: Madness Was: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]