Hello,
Daniel Savarese suggested that e-mail addresses on the "Who we are" page should not be
listed directly as a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a but as "foo at
bar.com".
This is will make it harder for spam robots to collect our e-mail addresses. For an
example of how
At 09:22 2/2/01 +0100, Ceki Glc wrote:
Hello,
Daniel Savarese suggested that e-mail addresses on the "Who we are" page
should not be listed directly as a
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a but as "foo at bar.com".
good idea. Oh and just in case no one saids it - You rock.
At 20:47 02.02.2001 +1100, you wrote:
At 09:22 2/2/01 +0100, Ceki Glc wrote:
Hello,
Daniel Savarese suggested that e-mail addresses on the "Who we are" page
should not be listed directly as a
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a but as "foo at bar.com".
good idea. Oh and just
reaches almost 5'11"... And 4 inches are _something_ :)
Pier (thinking: Tomcat is higher than anything else, I'm 6'0")
Which tomcat ? i'm about 6'7" :-)
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
PS: Sorry for waste of bandwidth :)
Thanks!
Sam Ruby wrote:
Tod Thomas wrote:
Could anyone point me in the direction of some documentation
that describes implementation of xml push technology ?
Here's a few:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/01/01/xml/xml.asp
Ceki Glc wrote:
Hello,
Daniel Savarese suggested that e-mail addresses on the "Who we are" page should not
be listed directly as a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a but as "foo at
bar.com".
This is will make it harder for spam robots to collect our e-mail addresses. For
At 07:41 2/2/01 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
When considering the merits of a product, it is important to consider
the human factor of both our users and developers. It's no secret the
teams working on competiting solutions often "hate each other". Maybe
that's a good thing. It may not be as
At 11:10 2/2/01 -0800, Jon Stevens wrote:
Ok, I'm seeing other people discuss this without any sort of final decision
here, so I think we need to get back on topic. So far, top level package
names are expressly reserved for top level projects.
Well not every one seems to obey it. Examples
On 2/3/2001 at 8:13 AM Peter Donald wrote:
We can't force projects - especially new ones - to reuse existing
codebases but overtime we should encourage it.
Thanks for saying this better than I did, Peter. +1.
I'd like to be a good Apache scientist some day, but sometimes it's
hard to
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, I just *mostly* implemented the J2EE extensions for Turbine's
Connection pool (the classes now at least implement the interfaces). It took
me all of about 30 minutes.
Have fun.
Thank you :) :) :)
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli
10 matches
Mail list logo