Listing your e-mail address

2001-02-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hello, Daniel Savarese suggested that e-mail addresses on the "Who we are" page should not be listed directly as a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a but as "foo at bar.com". This is will make it harder for spam robots to collect our e-mail addresses. For an example of how

Re: Listing your e-mail address

2001-02-02 Thread Peter Donald
At 09:22 2/2/01 +0100, Ceki Glc wrote: Hello, Daniel Savarese suggested that e-mail addresses on the "Who we are" page should not be listed directly as a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a but as "foo at bar.com". good idea. Oh and just in case no one saids it - You rock.

Re: Listing your e-mail address

2001-02-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 20:47 02.02.2001 +1100, you wrote: At 09:22 2/2/01 +0100, Ceki Glc wrote: Hello, Daniel Savarese suggested that e-mail addresses on the "Who we are" page should not be listed directly as a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a but as "foo at bar.com". good idea. Oh and just

RE: What is Avalon?

2001-02-02 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
reaches almost 5'11"... And 4 inches are _something_ :) Pier (thinking: Tomcat is higher than anything else, I'm 6'0") Which tomcat ? i'm about 6'7" :-) Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega PS: Sorry for waste of bandwidth :)

Re: XML Push

2001-02-02 Thread Tod Thomas
Thanks! Sam Ruby wrote: Tod Thomas wrote: Could anyone point me in the direction of some documentation that describes implementation of xml push technology ? Here's a few: http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/01/01/xml/xml.asp

Re: Listing your e-mail address

2001-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Ceki Glc wrote: Hello, Daniel Savarese suggested that e-mail addresses on the "Who we are" page should not be listed directly as a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a but as "foo at bar.com". This is will make it harder for spam robots to collect our e-mail addresses. For

Re: What is Struts? (was: Re: What is Avalon?)

2001-02-02 Thread Peter Donald
At 07:41 2/2/01 -0500, Ted Husted wrote: When considering the merits of a product, it is important to consider the human factor of both our users and developers. It's no secret the teams working on competiting solutions often "hate each other". Maybe that's a good thing. It may not be as

Re: Back to Avalon...

2001-02-02 Thread Peter Donald
At 11:10 2/2/01 -0800, Jon Stevens wrote: Ok, I'm seeing other people discuss this without any sort of final decision here, so I think we need to get back on topic. So far, top level package names are expressly reserved for top level projects. Well not every one seems to obey it. Examples

Re: What is Struts? (was: Re: What is Avalon?)

2001-02-02 Thread Ted Husted
On 2/3/2001 at 8:13 AM Peter Donald wrote: We can't force projects - especially new ones - to reuse existing codebases but overtime we should encourage it. Thanks for saying this better than I did, Peter. +1. I'd like to be a good Apache scientist some day, but sometimes it's hard to

Re: What is Struts? (was: Re: What is Avalon?)

2001-02-02 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI, I just *mostly* implemented the J2EE extensions for Turbine's Connection pool (the classes now at least implement the interfaces). It took me all of about 30 minutes. Have fun. Thank you :) :) :) Pier -- Pier Fumagalli