Re: [proposal] Jakarta Deprecation Policy

> Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me > start one. I seem to be good at that. :-) > > What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and > migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just being a Turbine > policy and get all the

Re: FW: if and unless attributes for all Tasks

When I ran across it in XSL, two words came to mind : 'scope creep'. I don't know the history of XSL, but that couldn't be what people were thinking in the beginning. geir Jon Stevens wrote: > > This is such a great discussion, I just had to open it up to a more general > group. > > The Ant g

FW: if and unless attributes for all Tasks

This is such a great discussion, I just had to open it up to a more general group. The Ant group is discussing the fact that putting conditional statements into XML is a terrible idea, yet JSP/Struts is doing exactly that with taglibs. Am I the only one who sees the disconnect here?

Re: [proposal] Jakarta Deprecation Policy

At 03:38 15/5/01 -0700, Jon Stevens wrote: >Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me >start one. I seem to be good at that. :-) > >What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and >migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just

Re: [proposal] Jakarta Deprecation Policy

>What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and >migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just being a Turbine >policy and get all the projects to "sign" their name on it. > > +1 >Comments? Nothing cont

Re: [proposal] Jakarta Deprecation Policy

On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me > start one. I seem to be good at that. :-) > > What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and > migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of j

Re: Contributing Open Source Developers

By sending this email to people directly as a BCC, you are hurting the concept of information sharing because no one else will find out what the answer is. So, I'm CC'ing general@jakarta with my response. on 5/15/01 3:51 PM, "Harris Mir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I took your email ad

[proposal] Jakarta Deprecation Policy

Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me start one. I seem to be good at that. :-) What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just being a Turbine policy and get all the projects t