Re: Nominations, +1s, ...
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Santiago Gala wrote: I'm ready to give +1 to people nominated which are missing them, but I could not find any posting telling if +1 are required, or are just to be considered a form of moral support. Could anybody clarify? Personally: I do not care much for seconding - just that the person accepts - simple voting is the true test in my personal opinion. And in a crowd as vocal as this I trust that issues are raised in time to make sure that seconding is non essential filtering mechanism. But that is a personal opinion - not the nessesarily shared by the voting volunteers opinion of that of the board or pmc. So for next time 2003 - you have some options. 1- No seconding needed - just acceptance. I would support 1. My concern was because I had seen people with no +1, and I wanted every nominee having the opportunity to get voted. I felt like I was spoiling my +1 by not using them. :) I don't think veto is right. Vetoes should be handled in the ballot. I mean, I can argue someone is not the right person, but this should not automatically discard them. The nomination mechanism is already giving a filter on who will be proposed. The ability to veto could become a problem if/when there are fighting fractions in the nominating group. 2- One seconding needed - and acceptance counts as such too. 3- More than one needed. 4- None needed - except to override a veto.. 5. Dw. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] Binary downloads page doesn't list latest BCEL release
Hi, all. SSIA. See diff below. -- Christopher Elkins Index: xdocs/site/binindex.xml === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/binindex.xml,v retrieving revision 1.126 diff -u -u -r1.126 binindex.xml --- xdocs/site/binindex.xml 14 Feb 2002 11:30:49 - 1.126 +++ xdocs/site/binindex.xml 14 Feb 2002 16:15:46 - @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-avalon/release/framework/latest/;Avalon Framework 4.1.2/a/li lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-avalon/release/excalibur/latest/;Avalon Excalibur 4.1/a/li lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-avalon/release/logkit/latest/;Avalon LogKit 1.0.1/a/li +lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-bcel/release/v5.0/;BCEL +5.0/a/li lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-cactus/release/v1.2/;Cactus 1.2/a/li lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-ecs/release/v1.4.1/;ECS 1.4.1/a/li lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-james/release/v2.0a2/binary/;James 2.0a2/a/li @@ -97,7 +98,6 @@ ul lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-avalon/release/phoenix/latest/;Avalon Phoenix 4.0 Alpha 3/a/li -lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-bcel/release/v5.0rc1/;BCEL 5.0 Release Candidate 1/a/li lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-lucene/release/v1.2-rc3/;Lucene 1.2 Release Candidate 3/a/li lia href=http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1-b1/bin/;Tomcat 3.3.1 Beta 1/a/li /ul -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
O'Reilly article about the JSPA
With a link back to our position paper... http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/02/13/osjava.html It is so sad that Sun is slowly killing support for Java. What a way to shoot yourself in the foot. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: O'Reilly article about the JSPA
sun is obstinate, and it may hurt them bad. matt - Original Message - From: Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:49 PM Subject: O'Reilly article about the JSPA With a link back to our position paper... http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/02/13/osjava.html It is so sad that Sun is slowly killing support for Java. What a way to shoot yourself in the foot. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
