Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons EL 1.0 Released
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 06:02 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 25/6/03 2:49 "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 06:58 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Someone cares to explain the difference between JEXL and this one? Jexl is my own concoction to do what the JSTL EL does with extensions, w/o worry about some of the limitations of the EL (such as access to methods...) Ah! :-) Because I always used the JSP spec to guide me in the use of JEXL expressions.. Jexl was originally written to support as far as it could the JSTL spec. That's still the intention - however, there are useful things from other places (like Velocity) where extending the spec was important to me and to users, such as arbitrary method calls foo.bar( woogie.thingy() ) I'm not sure where the JSP spec is on this at this point. Jelly uses Jexl, and Maven use Jelly, so there is some use :) I'm just digging around for expression languages, and was wondering about the differences (as they do look way similar)... Anyhow, I just opted to use JXPATH :-) :) geir Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-956-2604(w) Adeptra, Inc. 203-434-2093(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 203-247-1713(m) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons EL 1.0 Released
On 25/6/03 2:49 "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 06:58 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> Someone cares to explain the difference between JEXL and this one? > > Jexl is my own concoction to do what the JSTL EL does with extensions, > w/o worry about some of the limitations of the EL (such as access to > methods...) Ah! :-) Because I always used the JSP spec to guide me in the use of JEXL expressions.. > Jelly uses Jexl, and Maven use Jelly, so there is some use :) I'm just digging around for expression languages, and was wondering about the differences (as they do look way similar)... Anyhow, I just opted to use JXPATH :-) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs/site elsewhere.xml
rdonkin 2003/06/25 11:15:16 Modified:docs index.html docs/site elsewhere.html xdocsindex.xml xdocs/site elsewhere.xml Log: Added an item of news about ant and xerces winning 2003 javaworld awards. Better late than never. Revision ChangesPath 1.256 +2 -1 jakarta-site2/docs/index.html Index: index.html === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/docs/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.255 retrieving revision 1.256 diff -u -r1.255 -r1.256 --- index.html19 Jun 2003 20:42:44 - 1.255 +++ index.html25 Jun 2003 18:15:16 - 1.256 @@ -231,13 +231,14 @@ Other news from Jakarta and Elsewhere +25 June 2003 - +Ant and XercesJ win 2003 JavaWorld Awards 12 June 2003 - James featured on IBM developerWorks 03 June 2003 - Jakarta Lucene and Commons Digester featured on IBM developerWorks 28 May 2003 - Apache 2.0.46 Released 22 May 2003 - Jakarta Newsletter Issue 8 Released -12 May 2003 - James 2.1.3 released. 1.51 +13 -1 jakarta-site2/docs/site/elsewhere.html Index: elsewhere.html === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/docs/site/elsewhere.html,v retrieving revision 1.50 retrieving revision 1.51 diff -u -r1.50 -r1.51 --- elsewhere.html13 Jun 2003 02:10:55 - 1.50 +++ elsewhere.html25 Jun 2003 18:15:16 - 1.51 @@ -178,7 +178,19 @@ - + +25 June 2003 - Apache Tools Feature In 2003 JavaWorld Awards + + +The results of the 7th JavaWorld Tools award are given in http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-06-2003/jw-0609-eca.html";>this article. +http://ant.apache.org";>Ant won the Most Useful Java Community-Developed Technology +award. http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/index.html";>Xerces Java won the Best Java-XML Tool. + + +Congratulations! + + + 12 June 2003 - James featured on IBM developerWorks 1.203 +2 -1 jakarta-site2/xdocs/index.xml Index: index.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/index.xml,v retrieving revision 1.202 retrieving revision 1.203 diff -u -r1.202 -r1.203 --- index.xml 19 Jun 2003 20:42:44 - 1.202 +++ index.xml 25 Jun 2003 18:15:16 - 1.203 @@ -56,13 +56,14 @@ Other news from Jakarta and Elsewhere +25 June 2003 - +Ant and XercesJ win 2003 JavaWorld Awards 12 June 2003 - James featured on IBM developerWorks 03 June 2003 - Jakarta Lucene and Commons Digester featured on IBM developerWorks 28 May 2003 - Apache 2.0.46 Released 22 May 2003 - Jakarta Newsletter Issue 8 Released -12 May 2003 - James 2.1.3 released. 1.26 +13 -0 jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/elsewhere.xml Index: elsewhere.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/elsewhere.xml,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -r1.25 -r1.26 --- elsewhere.xml 13 Jun 2003 02:10:56 - 1.25 +++ elsewhere.xml 25 Jun 2003 18:15:16 - 1.26 @@ -10,6 +10,19 @@ + +25 June 2003 - Apache Tools Feature In 2003 JavaWorld Awards + + +The results of the 7th JavaWorld Tools award are given in this article. +Ant won the Most Useful Java Community-Developed Technology +award. Xerces Java won the Best Java-XML Tool. + + +Congratulations! + + + 12 June 2003 - James featured on IBM developerWorks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache vote on TCK re Sun
I'd hope the ASF would vote against it in the final vote if it doesn't support open implementations with reasonable licenses. On 6/25/03 9:11 AM, "Vic Cekvenich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=20005 > > http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=19942 > > As per above I Quote: > "though IBM and Motorola still voted no. There also appear to be some > disagreements within the JCP board about the licensing of these specs. > Sun apparently plans to charge a "Per unit royalty fee which will be > dependent on volume." > > Doug Lea voted with comment. > > Apache vote with Sun with YES, without comment this says. > > I am wondering why? Other voted YES with comment. > > I personally wish they voted NO as they did in past on similar topic. I > mean look at the implications, such as JBOSS is not J2EE (no big fan of > EJB here), this makes it harder to have a Jakarta project that is JCP. > > Is anyone privy to ASF feeling on this topic related to open source in > general and Java? I know there was some agreement btwn Sun and ASF. > JCP *is* Sun domintated, but not ASF, AFAIK > IBM seems more friendly to O.S, they said OK, but had a comment. > > > .V > > > ps: This is a possibility as well down the road: > http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030213.html > > That is why my clients don't use Sun VM in favor of BEA J:Rockit, and > IBM VM. Java would live past Sun, should the worst happen. > http://www.penguincomputing.com/graphics/desktops/eclipse1280x1024.jpg > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache vote on TCK re Sun
http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=20005 http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=19942 As per above I Quote: "though IBM and Motorola still voted no. There also appear to be some disagreements within the JCP board about the licensing of these specs. Sun apparently plans to charge a "Per unit royalty fee which will be dependent on volume." Doug Lea voted with comment. Apache vote with Sun with YES, without comment this says. I am wondering why? Other voted YES with comment. I personally wish they voted NO as they did in past on similar topic. I mean look at the implications, such as JBOSS is not J2EE (no big fan of EJB here), this makes it harder to have a Jakarta project that is JCP. Is anyone privy to ASF feeling on this topic related to open source in general and Java? I know there was some agreement btwn Sun and ASF. JCP *is* Sun domintated, but not ASF, AFAIK IBM seems more friendly to O.S, they said OK, but had a comment. .V ps: This is a possibility as well down the road: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030213.html That is why my clients don't use Sun VM in favor of BEA J:Rockit, and IBM VM. Java would live past Sun, should the worst happen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache vote on TCK re Sun
http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=20005 http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=19942 As per above I Quote: "though IBM and Motorola still voted no. There also appear to be some disagreements within the JCP board about the licensing of these specs. Sun apparently plans to charge a "Per unit royalty fee which will be dependent on volume." Doug Lea voted with comment. Apache vote with Sun with YES, without comment this says. I am wondering why? Other voted YES with comment. I personally wish they voted NO as they did in past on similar topic. I mean look at the implications, such as JBOSS is not J2EE (no big fan of EJB here), this makes it harder to have a Jakarta project that is JCP. Is anyone privy to ASF feeling on this topic related to open source in general and Java? I know there was some agreement btwn Sun and ASF. JCP *is* Sun domintated, but not ASF, AFAIK IBM seems more friendly to O.S, they said OK, but had a comment. .V ps: This is a possibility as well down the road: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030213.html That is why my clients don't use Sun VM in favor of BEA J:Rockit, and IBM VM. Java would live past Sun, should the worst happen. http://www.penguincomputing.com/graphics/desktops/eclipse1280x1024.jpg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
