cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml

2003-06-27 Thread tetsuya
tetsuya 2003/06/27 00:02:33 Modified:docs index.html xdocsindex.xml Log: Added 'Apache XML Project' to Jakarta Related Projects section, etc. Revision ChangesPath 1.258 +30 -4 jakarta-site2/docs/index.html Index: index.html

cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml

2003-06-27 Thread tetsuya
tetsuya 2003/06/27 00:16:13 Modified:docs index.html xdocsindex.xml Log: Fixed miscs. : Jakarta-Gump explanations etc. Revision ChangesPath 1.259 +2 -4 jakarta-site2/docs/index.html Index: index.html

RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread BAZLEY, Sebastian
Would it be possible to mangle/remove the e-mail addresses before publishing the postings? This would eventually fix the mirrors. However, unless the mailing list software can also be persuaded to hide the originators e-mail addresses (might be difficult?), it would not protect against others who

RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Krishnan
Hello, The general solution currently in vogue is to obscure the vital part of the e-mail address that contains the domain information on all pieces of information that are potentially in the public domain (and therefore can be harvested by spiders), such as web-pages that host the list.

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:29:23 +0100 (Subject: RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses) BAZLEY, Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be possible to mangle/remove the e-mail addresses before publishing the postings? This would eventually fix the mirrors.

RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread BAZLEY, Sebastian
-Original Message- From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2003 12:20 To: Jakarta General List Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:29:23 +0100 (Subject: RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Jakarta website has a very unfortunate and harmful feature - a full mbox archive at http://jakarta.apache.org/mail/ This is an invitation to spammers and people who spread viruses. And all those types are gladly taking advantage of it. Here is a few facts: -1. Open Source means

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
I'd be all of this if it would make a difference, unfortunately you're barking up the wrong tree. I'm getting that virus/attachment to every email address I have just about. I think it looks locally (user address book, etc). Thus I'm against this on the principal that its a big waste of time.

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrus Adamchik
I'd be all of this if it would make a difference, unfortunately you're barking up the wrong tree. You gotta start somewhere. The fact that others are doing it wrong is not an excuse to do the wrong thing yourself (see your own argument about Outlook - you can't make everyone in the world to

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:04 -0400 From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Craig (just cleaned out about 300 of these from this morning's mail) I feel your pain brother McClanahan, I feel your pain. I wish all of the dimwits who write the virus scanners would make it smart enough not to reply to the reply-to in the event of viruses which forge the reply-to...Duh.

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Santiago Gala
Andrew C. Oliver escribió: I'd be all of this if it would make a difference, unfortunately you're barking up the wrong tree. I'm getting that virus/attachment to every email address I have just about. I think it looks locally (user address book, etc). Thus I'm against this on the principal that

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Unfortunately only someone who doesn't use Outlook can really sue M$. You see the license agreement says you hold them harmless. Now a non-party to the license agreement can obviously sue them (I think). -Andy On 6/27/03 1:58 PM, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew C. Oliver

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread asudell
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:04 -0400 From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread J.Pietschmann
asudell wrote: Might it perhaps make sense to scrub or obsucure email addresses from the author tags? There was an article on slashdot mentioning a study about how spammers get the addresses. Basically scraping web pages mailto links and strings looking like email addresses seems to be the most