On Dec 30, 2003, at 8:37 PM, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
This doesn't seem quite right to me.
I agree that when we have voted in a new committer, both the existing
committers and the new committer have had the same expectations with
respect to their rights and
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 30, 2003, at 8:37 PM, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
This doesn't seem quite right to me.
I agree that when we have voted in a new committer, both the existing
committers and the new committer have had the same expectations with
respect to
If I were the chair of the Jakarta PMC and a board member and favored seeing
Jakarta split up into TLPs, I'd do this:
1. Put everyone on the PMC
2. Get them in a reorganization type discussion
Because the bulk of the 700? committers at Apache are in Jakarta and the
bulk of the discussion has no
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:13:59 -0500
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
If I were the chair of the Jakarta PMC and a board member and favored seeing
Jakarta split up into TLPs, I'd do this:
1. Put everyone on the PMC
2. Get them in a reorganization type discussion
In HTTPD/APR world. mostly Apache
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:13:59 -0500
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
If I were the chair of the Jakarta PMC and a board member and favored seeing
Jakarta split up into TLPs, I'd do this:
1. Put everyone on the PMC
2. Get them in a reorganization
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:18:29 -0500
Ted Husted wrote:
If Struts does graduate to a TLP, I would update the wiki page based
on our own experience (if someone doesn't beat me to it) and post a
link to all the DEV lists. (Unless, of course, the growing consensus
changes and the PMC decides to do
Hi, Henri and all
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:44:31 -0500 (EST)
Henri Yandell wrote:
I'd like to see the jakarta XXX PMC groups to be organized into
subgroups realms. Jakarta has it's own brand. You can have either
Jakarta POI or Apache POI, i guess... subsets of the group.
.. thus would be
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Two major options seem to be:
1) Big PMC that everyone is on, with the reality that we have
interest in various areas.
2) Promote projects to TLP.
2) is not realistic.
Why not? I don't agree that ALL projects should, but Henri didn't say
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:36:27 -0500
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Two major options seem to be:
1) Big PMC that everyone is on, with the reality that we have
interest in various areas.
2) Promote projects to TLP.
2) is not realistic.
In HTTPD/APR world. mostly Apache MEMBERS = Apache COMMITTERS.
(OH, you pointed it our, 6 months ago ;-)!
You must mean HTTPD PMC Members ~= HTTPD Committers more ore less. Yes.
Size matters. This is obviously not feasible for Jakarta as we are
demonstrating so aptly.
You/I can see the
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:27:30 -0500
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
In HTTPD/APR world. mostly Apache MEMBERS = Apache COMMITTERS.
(OH, you pointed it our, 6 months ago ;-)!
You must mean HTTPD PMC Members ~= HTTPD Committers more ore less. Yes.
Obvious. HTTPD (Apache HTTP WebServer Project) does
11 matches
Mail list logo
