OK,
here is the deal.The Cactus framework is, indeed, targeted to the Java 1.4.
I changed the dependency to servlet-api, version 1.4.
If you want to build the cactus site, then you first execute
mvn jxr:jxr
mvn javadoc:javadoc
(this will place the javadoc and the Xref for the whole project and
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK,
here is the deal.The Cactus framework is, indeed, targeted to the Java 1.4.
I changed the dependency to servlet-api, version 1.4.
If you want to build the cactus site, then you first execute
mvn jxr:jxr
mvn javadoc:javadoc
Tried mvn site from cactus-site, and it complains:
Missing:
--
1) org.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-decoration-model:jar:2.4.1
Is there an additional repository that needs to be included in the pom?
On 02/04/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am starting a new thread,
because we exceeded the limit from the Mailer-daemon.
The building of the web-site is described here:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-cactus/DeployingCactusWebSite
and I also committed some explanation in the howto_build.xml.
I also added a section on how to produce
OK, about the doxia-problem.
It is very strange. I see that too, but I suppose it is a bug
in Maven, because the
mvn site:site
works as a charm.
I will have to investigate that further.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am starting a new thread,
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am starting a new thread,
because we exceeded the limit from the Mailer-daemon.
The building of the web-site is described here:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-cactus/DeployingCactusWebSite
and I also committed some explanation in
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, about the doxia-problem.
It is very strange. I see that too, but I suppose it is a bug
in Maven, because the
mvn site:site
works as a charm.
Yes, for me too.
I will have to investigate that further.
No need - unless you
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am starting a new thread,
because we exceeded the limit from the Mailer-daemon.
The building of the web-site is described here:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-cactus/DeployingCactusWebSite
and I also committed some explanation in
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually
the cactus provides different implementations for the
different JVMs. My purpose is to make available for
download only the JVM 1.4 version in the binary archive.
If one needs an older version one can get it from the
Maven
Actually
the cactus provides different implementations for the
different JVMs. My purpose is to make available for
download only the JVM 1.4 version in the binary archive.
If one needs an older version one can get it from the
Maven repository, where I will place all of the archetypes.
I have
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:29 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually
the cactus provides different implementations for the
different JVMs. My purpose is to make available for
download only the JVM 1.4 version in the binary
It is included in the artifacts :-(
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:29 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually
the cactus provides different
I have just committed the changes plugin to generate the
JIRA report, too.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is included in the artifacts :-(
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:29 PM,
Is the scratchpad tree under trunk still needed?
If it's intended for experimentation, perhaps it should be moved to a
branch instead.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
When I started my work on Cactus the scratchpad was
already there. I think that nobody works in there right now,
and almost everything in the scratchpad is done by Vincent
Massol.
I prefer we move it in a separate branch, too.
Cheers, Petar.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:03 PM, sebb [EMAIL
OK,
I just moved it as a separate branch.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When I started my work on Cactus the scratchpad was
already there. I think that nobody works in there right now,
and almost everything in the scratchpad is done by Vincent
I'm just checking through a few remaining files that contain text, but
don't yet have the eol-style set.
The file
cactus-site/src/site/xdoc/original/Sequence.dfSequence
appears to be source - is the line ending important?
Another file is:
There seem to be a few xml files that don't start with the
?xml version=1.0 ...?
header line.
These are otherwise apparently valid xml files.
Is that intentional, or should the missing lines be added?
I can add them, but I don't want to mess anything up...
I think that all xml files should start with the xml header.
Can you add it, please?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:53 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seem to be a few xml files that don't start with the
?xml version=1.0 ...?
header line.
These are otherwise apparently valid xml files.
OK, done
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion the rat plugin should be specified in the build section.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:49 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
mvn rat:check
This seems to
OK done - apart from two very small jboss-web.xml files.
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that all xml files should start with the xml header.
Can you add it, please?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:53 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seem to be a few xml
sebb wrote:
The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
mvn rat:check
This seems to be because its plugin is under pluginManagement rather
than under build, as it works when I moved it there.
But I don't know much about Maven, so maybe it needs to be in both?
If so, does the config need
On 02/04/2008, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
mvn rat:check
This seems to be because its plugin is under pluginManagement rather
than under build, as it works when I moved it there.
But I don't know
Please unsubscribe me from this list - I have tried twice - still
getting emails. Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:49 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Cactus RAT report - where to add plugin in pom.xml?
The RAT
24 matches
Mail list logo
