Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
attic).
[ ] +1, G'night BSF
[ ] -1, No because:
Per Sebb's statement:
"Now that JSR-223 is part of Java 1.6 there is less need for BSF.
There are no bugs
On 2011-07-23, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
> against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
> attic).
> [X] +1, G'night Cactus
> [ ] -1, No because:
+1
Stefan
---
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> ...
>
>>
>> > * JMeter: Lots of activity. New committer in 2010.
>> >
>> > This should go TLP. There are two obvious members of a JMeter PMC
>> > present (sebb and milamber). Reality is that Jakarta=JMeter now, so
>> > hopefully there are
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Thought I'd summarize the current activity of the subprojects:
>
Thanks for getting this thread going Hen, I had thoughts of starting a
similar thread this weekend, given we're almost done with the BCEL and
JCS moves.
-Rahul
>
> * Cactus
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> ...
>
>>
>> > * JMeter: Lots of activity. New committer in 2010.
>> >
>> > This should go TLP. There are two obvious members of a JMeter PMC
>> > present (sebb and milamber). Reality is that Jakarta=JMeter now, so
>> > hopefully there ar
...
>
> > * JMeter: Lots of activity. New committer in 2010.
> >
> > This should go TLP. There are two obvious members of a JMeter PMC
> > present (sebb and milamber). Reality is that Jakarta=JMeter now, so
> > hopefully there are other interested parties who simply aren't active.
>
> Or perhaps
[x] +1, G'night Cactus
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 11:25 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
> against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
> attic).
>
> [ ] +1, G'night Cactus
> [ ] -1, No because:
>
> There's no act
On 23 July 2011 19:23, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Thought I'd summarize the current activity of the subprojects:
>
>
> * Cactus: No code commits since February 2009. Weak activity between
> 2006 and 2009.
>
> I think Cactus should head to the Attic.
+1
> * BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two
On 23 July 2011 19:25, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
> against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
> attic).
>
> [X] +1, G'night Cactus
> [ ] -1, No because:
>
> There's no activity in the project and I think it w
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:25:05AM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
> against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
> attic).
>
> [X] +1, G'night Cactus
> [ ] -1, No because:
>
Ian
---
Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
attic).
[ ] +1, G'night Cactus
[ ] -1, No because:
There's no activity in the project and I think it would be best to
recognize the reality and call it a day.
H
Thought I'd summarize the current activity of the subprojects:
* Cactus: No code commits since February 2009. Weak activity between
2006 and 2009.
I think Cactus should head to the Attic.
* BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
A difficult one to decide on. I think we shoul
12 matches
Mail list logo
