+1000
--- Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dude get a life and stop wining, we have better things to do, than read
> this shit.
> One thing is to have an opinion, the other thing is listening when
> people are actually saying you are wining and complaining at
--- Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fail to see what is the difference between JBoss Group LLC and any other
> private/public corporation developing a J2EE solution...
>
Neither do i, provided that corporation gives you their j2ee server for free, with no
strings
attached; you don
The true question will be whether they plan to enfore the patents. Which, looking at
their track
record and anti-open source position, seems likely.
--- Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Surprise surprise...
>
> http://www.javalobby.org/thread.jsp?forum=61&thread=6843
>
>
i disagree. C# is just a language, it is != .net. there are many pieces to the .net
puzzle that
you can be sure microsoft will never release to open source or a true standards body.
If Apache
commits to C#, it would do nothing but lend credibility to Micro$oft and .net in the
eyes of
uninfor
thanks everyone for all the info. i see i have a lot of work to do. ;)
if anyone would like help out or give more advice, please do so.
--- acoliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:13:50 1100 Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote.
>
> No offense to commons but if one
My name is Nathaniel Auvil and I run the jCharts project hosted at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jcharts/
I was wondering if there would be any possibility of jCharts joining the Jakarta
project. I have
been carrying all the weight of this project since its inception have trouble finding
peo