Re: Call on Stein to resign over Gernimo

2003-11-11 Thread Nathaniel G. Auvil
+1000 --- Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dude get a life and stop wining, we have better things to do, than read this shit. One thing is to have an opinion, the other thing is listening when people are actually saying you are wining and complaining at the

Re: Sun

2003-05-28 Thread Nathaniel G. Auvil
--- Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I fail to see what is the difference between JBoss Group LLC and any other private/public corporation developing a J2EE solution... Neither do i, provided that corporation gives you their j2ee server for free, with no strings attached; you don't

Re: Microsoft attempts to patent .NET

2003-02-12 Thread Nathaniel G. Auvil
The true question will be whether they plan to enfore the patents. Which, looking at their track record and anti-open source position, seems likely. --- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Surprise surprise... http://www.javalobby.org/thread.jsp?forum=61thread=6843 --

Re: Sun Is Losing Its Way

2002-12-06 Thread Nathaniel G. Auvil
i disagree. C# is just a language, it is != .net. there are many pieces to the .net puzzle that you can be sure microsoft will never release to open source or a true standards body. If Apache commits to C#, it would do nothing but lend credibility to Micro$oft and .net in the eyes of

adding my project to jakarta

2002-02-25 Thread Nathaniel G. Auvil
My name is Nathaniel Auvil and I run the jCharts project hosted at http://sourceforge.net/projects/jcharts/ I was wondering if there would be any possibility of jCharts joining the Jakarta project. I have been carrying all the weight of this project since its inception have trouble finding

Re: Re: adding my project to jakarta

2002-02-25 Thread Nathaniel G. Auvil
thanks everyone for all the info. i see i have a lot of work to do. ;) if anyone would like help out or give more advice, please do so. --- acoliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:13:50 1100 Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote. No offense to commons but if one can