Re: Viewcvs MIA
Endre Stølsvik at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...I'm not going to quote what he said...] Are you nuts? Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sun has to release java
Nael Mohammad at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only thing preventing Java from manifesting is Sun itself. Sun get a clue, you fought MS hard and won and now you cry wolf when the leader of the pack refuses to support Java. What's wrong with you? Does MS bitch to you not bundling IE for Unix with your Solaris. NO! So why should they support you, if has no economic value to MS? What EVA is earned if you refuse to license JAVA to MS? None! So stop the CRYing. What you should do is let JAVA manifest itself by just donating it to the OPEN Source community. Just let it go! And Java will be the defacto standar and not MS. (To defend my employer a little bit)... I believe no Sun official ever cried wolf when Microsoft removed Java support from Windows XP. Actually, (personal opinion) removing a 1.1.4 from the OS gives us the opportunity to push the Java 2 platform more strongly (no more people coming to me saying tomcat doesn't work with Microsoft JView... THERE'S NO JVIEW ANYMORE!) My 2c. Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java
Endre Stølsvik at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Read this stuff? : http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-08-13-009-20-OP Everyone has his own opinion, and, of course, mine is different from Mr. Ganesh Prasad. Go and read other articles from him, you'll find him... Amusing??? :) :) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scope
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another thing to take into consideration is the wishes of the majority of committers of the code base. Particularly existing code bases. If the majority of committers of any project (or even a group of projects collectively) decided that they no longer belonged here, then I would be disappointed certainly, but I do what I could to help them with their transition. IMHO, it doesn't _really_ matters whether a certain project is out of scope or not. I mean, everyone has its view on what could be in our scope. One focus point, IMHO, is the _community_ around a certain project. Take an example, Log4J, the latest addition to our range, some might fear it is an out of scope project, some might not, but for sure the community behind it is a good community, sincerely oriented in the Apache way of doing open source. As Brian keeps saying, we're not a software repository, we're not SourceForge, we're here to host communities of developers, communities working in our way. So, getting back to the RDB problem, all I'm saying is that it's pointless for us to go out there and chase that piece of code, we should, instead, chase the community of people behind the project, if they are inclined towards us... And, from what I heard, they're not... Just my 0.02 UKP... (Approx 0.03 US$) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Project idea (Hypersonic)
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I totally agree and I'll be more than happy to see hsql in jakarta. But they haven't approached us... And I believe the first step should be done by them.. Sometimes competition in similar (or same) projects became a sane emulation (Pier knows what I mean :) We're not competing with HSQL... And after all sourceforge is now a really good area to host OpenSource projects (java and others). I don't see what you mean... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Attachments Deleted by MailScan!
Avi Cherry at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like we just got a copy of the new Outlook Trojan horse. Shields up, everybody. At least if you run Outlook and are dumb enough to double-click on random attachments in your emails. :-) There was no attachment (thank god) and the user has been unsubscribed. Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Project idea (Hypersonic)
burtonator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an FYI. I have spent a lot of time recently working with the Hypersonic people. There are a number of issues here. It seems they talked to Apache in the past about moving Hypersonic under Jakarta but were turned down. Since then a lot has happened. [...] That said I hope other ASF developers are able to convince them to change their ways where I have failed. I am sure more voices will help make these issues more relevant. IMVHO, we shouldn't run after projects who, as you said, have a negative inclination towards the Foundation. We have already enough stuff in our bags to keep us busy forever, and although the project seems to be pretty cool, I don't see a reason why we should incorporate it within our family. If one of their team comes up and asks, we can consider it, but I don't feel it's our task to go out and convince them to join us... ?xml version=1.0 dorkism source=uber geek Apache != Borg :) /dorkism Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Microsoft pulls back on Java support
Mike Braden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone seen this yet? So what? They're dropping support for applets in the standard Windows-XP distribution... We're working on the other side, who the crap cares about applets? :) :) :) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let me explain. Even though I see your point, I'd still prefer seeing it over in XML alongside with the other technologies doing the same exact thing... Jakarta has alrady a wide enough spectrum of problems covered (from build systems, to ioc frameworks). From what I can see, XML-RPC is based on XML (or a subset of it), is used to transmit objects and call methods over HTTP (same as SOAP), s, since it's an alternative to SOAP, it should go alongside with it. -1 for XML-RPC on Jakarta... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 7/5/01 5:52 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, one day I'll change it (also because it generates 70% of the traffic on daedalus!) And because CollabNet has to pay for that... Comes straight out of your paycheck? :) :) :) Pier (being the usual asshole!) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to xml.apache.org. I agree 100% with Sam... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version
For Tomcat defintely the best option would be CRIMSON, as it's TINY, fast, compliant, and it works... And it shouldn't crash the whole shit if you have JAXP already installed somewhere Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig R. McClanahan wrote: +1 for BSF as a Jakarta project. Ditto. Doh :) +1 Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Size of the site...
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P.S. What's the going rate for 3 gig these days? Nothing... But it's kind of a lot when you think about mirroring the site... Bandwidth, time-to-mirror... And so on... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Size of the site...
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 6/16/01 7:22 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bummer... The JAKARTA site, is more than 3 freakin' gigs... We should definitely _do_ something... I'll look in where all the rubbish is... It is all the archived files, nightly builds, etc... /www/jakarta.apache.org/builds Yep... I noticed. But if we want to have that site mirrored, we should do something before hands... What about creating a historic.apache.org, were older releases are archived, and keeping only the last 2/3 ones on the main web sites??? Pier -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Size of the site...
Bummer... The JAKARTA site, is more than 3 freakin' gigs... We should definitely _do_ something... I'll look in where all the rubbish is... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How times change !!
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 6/13/01 7:38 AM, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cam across this old article while searching for something. It gave me a little chuckle. http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-1996/jw-04-newsbriefs_p.html Conor Woah! I didn't even know about that. :-) Nice find and the humor is indeed great. :-) That article gives me rashes :) :) :) Itchyy :) :) :) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JSR47 Critique
Ceki Gülcü at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, Here is a written critique of JSR47, the logging API shipped with JDK 1.4: http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html If you agree with its contents, then you are encouraged to send a personalized request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] asking them to adopt log4j as the logging API shipped with JDK 1.4. Please cc: me if and when you choose do so. Thank you in advance. No matter how many requests they get, it's too bad, but this is for sure not going to happen, as what's delivered in the platform strictly must adhere to what the JCP produces. Apache is a member of the JCP for the J2EE platform, but not for the J2SE, where JSR47 falls, that's why we weren't asked to vote. Anyway, knowing Graham (he's a very reasonable person), I bet that for the next revision of the API you will be asked to participate :) Not all hope is lost... :) :) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebMaster needed...
Brian gave up :) He's no longer with me on the webmaster@jakarta and webmaster@xml aliases... Anyone wants to help? (Lots of fun over there, plenty of good laughs!) (Reply me privately, please...) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using the Apache Licence
Jasper Potts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am starting a new open source project and would like to use the apache licence for two reasons: the ability to use the code in commercial projects and in the hope that one day it may get accepted as a Jakarta project. I have a couple of questions as to how to apply the licence: Does the full licence have to be included at the top of each file or can it be included in the distribution with a smaller include at the top, like GPL? Some of us quote it entirely, some of us use the small quote, it really depends. Usually we quote it entirely, but that can be changed easily if wanted.. Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using the Apache Licence
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 6/8/01 6:52 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jasper Potts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am starting a new open source project and would like to use the apache licence for two reasons: the ability to use the code in commercial projects and in the hope that one day it may get accepted as a Jakarta project. I have a couple of questions as to how to apply the licence: Does the full licence have to be included at the top of each file or can it be included in the distribution with a smaller include at the top, like GPL? Some of us quote it entirely, some of us use the small quote, it really depends. Usually we quote it entirely, but that can be changed easily if wanted.. Pier The full quoted license is currently the only way to do it officially by the ASF and have it be legal. Having a shorter license for people to use in source files is part of the requirements for the next license revision. You're on the licensing list, and know better than me, but I remember committing something with headers like /*** * (C) , The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. * * --- * * This software is distributed under the terms of the Apache Software * * License version x.x a copy of which can be found in the LICENSE.txt * * file included in this distribution. * ***/ Should I go back and change it? Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using the Apache Licence
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 6/8/01 10:56 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're on the licensing list, and know better than me, but I remember committing something with headers like /*** * (C) , The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. * * --- * * This software is distributed under the terms of the Apache Software * * License version x.x a copy of which can be found in the LICENSE.txt * * file included in this distribution. * ***/ Should I go back and change it? Pier Yes. That license is not legally approved, it is something you made up. If it was legally approved, you would have seen it available on the Jakarta website or on the main Apache.org site. Legal stuff sucks. Gone checking some files :) :) :) Thanks... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: doinking around with a logo
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 6/6/01 5:16 PM, bill parducci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what is it? b Look at the website. It is the image in the upper left hand corner of every single page. It is even titled appropriately... http://jakarta.apache.org/images/jakarta-logo.gif Oh, yes, and not to mention the fact that that logo is following the style of the ASF (check out the foundation logo)... And I really love sharp edged fonts (that one should be a Trebouchet Bold, one of my favourites) :) +1 on the old one :) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Theft of authorship
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 6/7/01 11:42 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This comes up from time to time and usually has me jump through the roof. Good willing contributors, take a piece of existing log4j code, modify or enhance it, but remove the previous author's names. They then post their code as if it was their own. Regardless of how much they modified the code, by removing the previous author's names they are committing theft. I find this very disturbing. What do others think? What can we do to combat this phenomenon? Regards, Ceki There is a difference between doing this accidentally and doing it on purpose. If it is determined that it is done on purpose and the people who did it refuse to follow the license, then the Jakarta PMC should be notified and we can sick the ASF Legal team on the problem. Note, this seems like it would be a last resort type of situation. The best is to try to at least discuss with the villains (jokingly said) first and make sure that it was not intentional. I remember decompiling some classes of a servlet engine back in 1997... That was quite fun, too bad that the ASF wasn't there at the time, because the villain was a _real_ d**k (but he's rich now, crap! :) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: doinking around with a logo
bill parducci at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kicking around the apache web site i noticed that jakarta uses the basic apache logo. since many of the projects seem to have their own logos i figured i would give it a shot to see what i came up with. here is what i did: http://www.pier64.com/jakarta.jpg if nothing else, i would be interested to see what anyone may think about it. The little thinghie over the latter a is Copyright by Sun... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project. 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a vote? Just downloaded, and I must admit that it seems a nice piece of toy (for a long time fan of swish-e :)... +1 if the community is willing to support it... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bugzilla
Charles Benett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: Jason van Zyl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles Benett wrote: Does anyone know who I should approach to add James to Bugzilla? Thanks, Charles I can add it for you if you like. Jon helped me setup the Turbine issue tracking so I would be glad to pass along the good will :-) You can send me a message privately outlining what you like setup and I will do it today. And thank you for notifying the persons who maintain the BugZilla installation (AKA me and Justy :) Pier Well, this is all as clear as mud! Could you either do or tell me how to: 1) add James as a program 2) add 1.2.1 as a version 3) add the following components: SMTP Server; POP3 Server; Mailet Engine; Mailet API Taking it offline... :) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bugzilla
Jason van Zyl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles Benett wrote: Does anyone know who I should approach to add James to Bugzilla? Thanks, Charles I can add it for you if you like. Jon helped me setup the Turbine issue tracking so I would be glad to pass along the good will :-) You can send me a message privately outlining what you like setup and I will do it today. And thank you for notifying the persons who maintain the BugZilla installation (AKA me and Justy :) Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: It's not the Apache Public License
Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's just the "Apache License". http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/license.html http://xml.apache.org/batik/license.html Could the respective parties in charge of these pages please fix this? Thanks. Would be better to send it also to someone at XML, don't you think??? :) :) (I'm CCing some...) Pier (freezing his butt in Dublin) -- Pier Fumagalli http://www.betaversion.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mail Question?
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 3/18/01 10:32 PM, "Peter Donald" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anyway to set it up so that ezmlm will allow certain mail addresses "through" without being subscribed. Yes, the moderator of the list does that. You can moderate "allow" a moderated message by simply Reply-To-All (notice the CC email). That will add the user to the allow file. That's what I usually do when I have to approve emails coming from committers (or recognized as such by my flebile memory) and going to some mailing list... Pier (somewhere in Europe... Maybe London???) -- Pier Fumagalli http://www.betaversion.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PMC meeting agenda
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Below is the proposed agenda. Let me know if anybody would like to propose any additions or changes. When are you planning to throw it? Pier -- Pier Fumagalli http://www.betaversion.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jakarta PMC election results
Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pierpaolo Fumagalli: Jserv, probably Tomcat? Craig McClanahan: Jserv, Struts, probably Tomcat? Jserv is dead, and both of us are working on Tomcat 4.0 Pier -- Pier Fumagalli http://www.betaversion.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Action regarding umbrella PMCs [long]
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Elias Bayeh, IBM[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hans Bergstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] James Davidson, Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pierpaolo Fumagalli, IBM[EMAIL PROTECTED] Craig McClanahan, MyTownNet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stefano Mazzocchi, Independent [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jon Stevens, Clear Ink [EMAIL PROTECTED] James Todd, Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pierpaolo Fumagalli is IBMer ? Used to be one... Then I moved to a startup called Intalio and finally (thank god) I landed at Sun... And I'm not going to move from here for quite a long time... Pier -- Pier Fumagalli http://www.betaversion.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Action regarding umbrella PMCs [long]
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who you accept paychecks from and who you are can be quite different things. Pier is a perfect example. Meaning that no-matter who "owned" me, I've always been the usual pain in the ass :) :) :) :) Pier -- Pier Fumagalli http://www.betaversion.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mrs. Robinson...
I found this nice article on Salon tonight, and I wanted to share it with my closest friends :) http://www.salon.com/tech/col/garf/2001/01/08/bad_java/index.html For sure the guy grew up in a bad way :) Just take a look at his name, is he an hybrid between Homer and Simon Garfunkel? (Well, I can't say my name is better - translated it would sound like "Peter Paul Smoking Chickens" - but his sounds like "Mrs. Robinson's Donuts"...) I'd give him a big phat "californian" what-EVERR :) :) :) Pier -- -------- Pier P. Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PATCH] Fix for race condition in SimplePool, fixes bug#728
Lindsay Patten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [The bug site is down] Whops... Sorry, we were installing the new Disk Array (280 Gigs, slurp :) and the new Backup Unit... Pier -- Pier P. Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:
Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I assume that was something in japanese which very few people can read. Please post ascii based emails and we may be able to understand whatever it was you were saying :) It was spam, I checked it out... I got 5/6 copies of the message for the different mailing lists and on one of them my finger slipped from "reject" to "accept"... My fault, sorry... Pier -- -------- Pier P. Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here?
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 2/18/01 12:27 AM, "Federico Barbieri" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's fine with me. so let's ge for jakarta-avalon jakarta-avalon-phoenix jakarta-avalon-cornerstone Is it ok with everybody? Fede +1 (going round and round and round...) Yeah, and it seems not enough... What are the other two modules that suddently appeared on the CVS? jakarta-avalon-logkit and jakarta-avalon-testlet They also have wrong permissions, along with the main jakarta-avalon repository... WAAAHG!! Pier -- Pier Fumagalli http://www.betaversion.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Avalon mailing list...
The Avalon mailing list is currently [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the current CVS status says that it's a Jakarta project (jakarta-avalon*)... Wouldn't it be wise to change it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Pier -- Pier P. Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AW2: Streaming-Server (RTSP,RTP)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Peter, you are right, and yes, I could perhaps contribute some coding. I just wanted to know whether there's anything already in progress or better. But if not, why not start a new piece. ;) Thomas Nah, there's nothing right now... Last year I wrote some RTSP proxy code, but never get anywhere... Would be fun though! Pier -- Pier Fumagalli http://www.betaversion.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is open source unamerican...
I found this on another mailing list completely unrelated to Open Source, and I believe it makes more sense around here :) Microsoft has completely lost its mind... http://www.salon.com/tech/log/2001/02/15/unamerican/index.html Pier -- Pier Fumagalli http://www.betaversion.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Here you have, ;o)
Clay Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: Check This! DELETE THOSE TWO MESSAGES! THEY CONTAIN A VIRUS IN THE ATTACCHED VBS FILE. Clay Atkins has been already unsubscribed from ALL mailing lists, and I'll take care of mailbombing him privately later on today... Pier -- Pier P. Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The MessageLabs Virus Control Centre discovered a possible virus or unauthorised code (such as a joke program or trojan) in an email sent by you. Please read this whole email carefully. It explains what has happened to your email, which suspected virus has been caught, and what to do if you need help. Some details about the infected message To help identify the email: The message was titled 'Here you have, ;o)' The message date was Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:04:53 -0600 The message identifier was 01c801c0952f$1033b6c0$[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message recipients were [EMAIL PROTECTED] To help identify the virus: Scanner 3 (NAI Virus Scan) reported the following: /var/qmail/queue/split/0/659954_2MA-OCTET-STREAM_AnnaKournikova.jpg.vbs Found the VBS/SST virus !!! The message was diverted into the virus holding pen on mail server server-22.tower-4.starlabs.net (id 659954_982008144) and will be held for 30 days before being destroyed. What should you do now? If you sent the email from a corporate network, you should first contact your local Helpdesk or System Administrator for advice. They will be able to help you disinfect your workstation. If you sent the email from a personal or home account, you will need to disinfect your computer yourself. To do this you will need an anti-virus program. We suggest using one of the leading industry anti-virus packages such as McAfee, F-Secure or Cybersoft, which cost £15-£30 per copy. Getting more help You may like to read the Support FAQs at http://www.messagelabs.com/support/FAQs.htm These will answer many of the most common queries. If you believe this message to be a false alarm or you require further assistance, you can email MessageLabs Support at:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] or contact MessageLabs Helpdesk by telephone on:- +44 (0) 1452 627766 Please quote the following Virus Pen ID when contacting Support. mail server server-22.tower-4.starlabs.net (id 659954_982008144) _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
