Re: A Jakarta unused code scoreboard [was RE: [Fwd: Re: [eclipse-dev]Java compiler defaults changed]]...

2002-10-24 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Vladimir R. Bossicard wrote: but these are actually pretty good! I forwarded them to the poi dev list. Time to have a gump-like Maven based PMD website for the Apache projects? +1 -Vladimir Not for POI but for those who want it ... sure. I'm so excited about the new centipede's easy

Re: A Jakarta unused code scoreboard [was RE: [Fwd: Re: [eclipse-dev]Java compiler defaults changed]]...

2002-10-24 Thread Vladimir R. Bossicard
but these are actually pretty good! I forwarded them to the poi dev list. Time to have a gump-like Maven based PMD website for the Apache projects? +1 -Vladimir -- Vladimir R. Bossicard www.bossicard.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:general-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For

Re: A Jakarta unused code scoreboard [was RE: [Fwd: Re: [eclipse-dev]Java compiler defaults changed]]...

2002-10-24 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
At first I was going to complain and say Another one of these? Most of the automated code metrics I read complain about things in POI which are like duh its an API of course its an 'unused' class -- or duh its a development utility or test case which isn't MEANT to be flexible --but these are

RE: A Jakarta unused code scoreboard [was RE: [Fwd: Re: [eclipse-dev] Java compiler defaults changed]]...

2002-10-24 Thread Tom Copeland
, October 24, 2002 10:21 AM To: Jakarta General List Subject: Re: A Jakarta unused code scoreboard [was RE: [Fwd: Re: [eclipse-dev] Java compiler defaults changed]]... At first I was going to complain and say Another one of these? Most of the automated code metrics I read complain about