The original vote tally for this vote was incorrectly listed as 4
+1 binding votes. There were in fact 5 +1 binding votes. The
restated results follow:
-
The resolution to approve a 2.0.8 maintenance release of jakarta-oro
has passed with 5 binding +1 votes from Jakarta PMC members and
>Now I see it went "just" to general & pmc, because I was following on
>the informative re-broadcast, so this is the reason why it has not been
>counted.
No, I screwed up. I remember counting your vote and verifying "bindingness"
against the committee file, but screwed up and didn't record it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El domingo, 28 dici, 2003, a las 23:21 Europe/Madrid, Daniel F.
Savarese escribió:
The resolution to approve a 2.0.8 maintenance release of jakarta-oro
has passed with 4 binding +1 votes from Jakarta PMC members and no -1
votes. Many thanks to all wh
The resolution to approve a 2.0.8 maintenance release of jakarta-oro
has passed with 4 binding +1 votes from Jakarta PMC members and no -1
votes. Many thanks to all who voted. I will now proceed to package and
upload a release for distribution, update appropriate Web pages, and
email an announce
