Now I see it went just to general pmc, because I was following on
the informative re-broadcast, so this is the reason why it has not been
counted.
No, I screwed up. I remember counting your vote and verifying bindingness
against the committee file, but screwed up and didn't record it because
The original vote tally for this vote was incorrectly listed as 4
+1 binding votes. There were in fact 5 +1 binding votes. The
restated results follow:
-
The resolution to approve a 2.0.8 maintenance release of jakarta-oro
has passed with 5 binding +1 votes from Jakarta PMC members and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El domingo, 28 dici, 2003, a las 23:21 Europe/Madrid, Daniel F.
Savarese escribió:
The resolution to approve a 2.0.8 maintenance release of jakarta-oro
has passed with 4 binding +1 votes from Jakarta PMC members and no -1
votes. Many thanks to all
The resolution to approve a 2.0.8 maintenance release of jakarta-oro
has passed with 4 binding +1 votes from Jakarta PMC members and no -1
votes. Many thanks to all who voted. I will now proceed to package and
upload a release for distribution, update appropriate Web pages, and
email an
-Original Message-
From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 17:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release
[X] +1 I approve the release of jakarta-oro version 2.0.8
-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 15:34
To: Jakarta Project Management Committee List; Gary Gregory
Cc: 'Jakarta Project Management Committee List';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El miércoles, 24 dici, 2003, a las 02:39 Europe/Madrid, Daniel F.
Savarese escribió:
[X] +1 I approve the release of jakarta-oro version 2.0.8.
[ ] -1 I do not approve the release of jakarta-oro version 2.0.8.
+1 From here.
Just another binding +1
On Dec 23, 2003, at 5:39 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
I know now may not be the best time to have a vote, but I would ask
the PMC to vote on approving the release of jakarta-oro 2.0.8.
The current code base contains important bug fixes and has gone too
long without a public release.
[ ] +1 I
Quoting Daniel F. Savarese [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I know now may not be the best time to have a vote, but I would ask
the PMC to vote on approving the release of jakarta-oro 2.0.8.
The current code base contains important bug fixes and has gone too
long without a public release.
[X] +1 I
Quoting Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-Original Message-
From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 17:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release
[X] +1 I
+1
On Dec 23, 2003, at 8:39 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
I know now may not be the best time to have a vote, but I would ask
the PMC to vote on approving the release of jakarta-oro 2.0.8.
The current code base contains important bug fixes and has gone too
long without a public release.
[ ] +1
I know now may not be the best time to have a vote, but I would ask
the PMC to vote on approving the release of jakarta-oro 2.0.8.
The current code base contains important bug fixes and has gone too
long without a public release.
[ ] +1 I approve the release of jakarta-oro version 2.0.8.
[ ] -1
12 matches
Mail list logo
