Did you consider that we were out of functional email reach?
+1 from me - I haven't used it, but it comes highly recommended from a
source I trust (besides you...)
geir
Jon Stevens wrote:
Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted
+1 (back at home recovering from J1).
Craig
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ted Husted wrote:
Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?
+1
I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.
Jon Stevens wrote:
Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
5 of 10 (not counting
Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?
+1
I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.
Jon Stevens wrote:
Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
voted (shame on you). Can I please get the
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a
vote?
Just downloaded, and I must admit that it seems a
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a
vote?
Do we have an initial list of committers?
Unless
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Do we have an initial list of committers?
Unless it has a critical mass (read: three active developers), I would
prefer commons-sandbox over a full fledged project.
Why? It seems that commons-sandbox is becoming a mini sourceforge. I thought
