+1 (back at home recovering from J1).
Craig
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ted Husted wrote:
> Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?
>
> +1
>
> I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.
>
> Jon Stevens wrote:
> >
> > Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
> >
> > 5 of 10 (n
Did you consider that we were out of functional email reach?
+1 from me - I haven't used it, but it comes highly recommended from a
source I trust (besides you...)
geir
Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
>
> 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members vot
Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?
+1
I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.
Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
>
> 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
> voted (shame on you). Can I please get t
on 6/6/01 6:02 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: sourceforge; there are a number of differences. Has a community and a
> relationship or affinity with other Jakarta projects are key
> differentiators. Again, by the latter measure, Lucene is a slightly weak
> Jakarta subproject (IM
Conor MacNeill wrote:
>
> Why? It seems that commons-sandbox is becoming a mini sourceforge. I
thought
> commons was about small independent reusable components.
Lucene is an independent reusable component.
There are many measures of size - lines of code, size of community, etc.
By these measure
Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> Is 9 enough?
+1
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> Do we have an initial list of committers?
>
> Unless it has a critical mass (read: three active developers), I would
> prefer commons-sandbox over a full fledged project.
Why? It seems that commons-sandbox is becoming a mini sourceforge. I thought
on 6/6/01 5:04 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we have an initial list of committers?
Sure...
http://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?group_id=3922
> Unless it has a critical mass (read: three active developers), I would
> prefer commons-sandbox over a full fledged project
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
>
> 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
> voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a
> vote?
Do we have an initial list of committers?
Unle
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
>
> 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
> voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a
> vote?
Just downloaded, and I must admit that it seem
10 matches
Mail list logo
