En réponse à "Gonyou, Austin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yeah sure no problem. I was directed here after discussing the issue
> with a
> couple of httpd guys.
> I've already checked the tomcat mailing list, as well. Plus this is
> _NOT_ a
> tomcat issue. It's a mod_jk issue.
mod_jk is STILL part of
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Using mod_jk with apache 1.3.20
>
>
> Yeah sure no problem. I was directed here after discussing
> the issue with a
> couple of httpd guys.
> I've already checked the tomcat mailing list, as well. Plus
>
9023
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:42 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Using mod_jk with apache 1.3.20
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Gonyou, Austin wrote:
> Thanks for the response, but I don't know if it answers the question. Let me
> expount a bit and I'll see if it makes things clearer.
>
Could you *please* do your expounding on the correct mailing list?
The GENERAL list is for issues about Jakarta
inal Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:17 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Using mod_jk with apache 1.3.20
>>
>>
>> Use this:
>>
>> //
; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Using mod_jk with apache 1.3.20
>
>
> Use this:
>
> //-
Use this:
//
response.setContentType( "text/html" );
PrintWriter pw = response.getWriter( );
pw.writeln( "" );
pw.writeln( "MOD_JK Test" );
pw.writeln( "Here´s my HTML." );
pw.writeln( "" );
pw.writeln( "" );
pw
