Ted Husted wrote:
>
>> o At any time, the majority of committers of a code base may vote
>> to remove their project from Jakarta.
>
> I don't know if that's exactly true. Anyone can go off and start a new
> codebase based on any Apache product, but they are suppose to use a new
> name and their
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ted Husted writes:
>And, oops, I just realized that I never promoted the working draft of
>the guidelines
>
>< http://jakarta.apache.org/site/proposal.html >
>
>to the top level of the site. Assuming that's still OK, I'll go ahead
>and do that.
>
>Perhaps I should
The "spirit" of Jakarta was more evident in the contstituion back on
java.apache.org:
"Unlike other open source projects where an individual rules the project
as a benevolent dictator, the Java Apache Project form is government is
based on merit: everyone who deserves it get the right to vote an
I don't know how useful this thread has been to everyone else, but it's
been helpful to me because I was starting to feel I misunderstood
the spirit of the Jakarta project.
I think it might be useful to add these extracts from the thread
as addenda to "Creation of subprojects" on
http://jakar
